Up@dawn 2.0 (blogger)

Delight Springs

Wednesday, June 30, 2021

"Storyville Gardens"

Timely answer to my complaint about a decline of interest in reading! TR would approve...
"...Now and then I am asked as to “what books a statesman should read,” and my answer is, poetry and novels — including short stories under the head of novels. I don’t mean that he should read only novels and modern poetry. If he cannot also enjoy the Hebrew prophets and the Greek dramatists, he should be sorry. He ought to read interesting books on history and government, and books of science and philosophy; and really good books on these subjects are as enthralling as any fiction ever written in prose or verse. Gibbon and Macaulay, Herodotus, Thucydides and Tacitus, the Heimskringla, Froissart, Joinville and Villehardouin, Parkman and Mahan, Mommsen and Ranke — why! there are scores and scores of solid histories, the best in the world, which are as absorbing as the best of all the novels, and of as permanent value. The same thing is true of Darwin and Huxley and Carlyle and Emerson, and parts of Kant..."

Against entropy

 Enlightening class last night. I think maybe the most instructive conversation centered on that cliche that "everything happens for a reason" etc. My perspective, close to Pinker's, is that of course everything happens from causes, known, elusive, or merely speculated; but that just as obviously, not everything real is rational, not everything happens for the best or by design or with our collective good in view... (continues)

Tuesday, June 29, 2021

Questions July 6

 Post before Tuesday if possible. I have no opportunity to look at your posts before class, after Tuesday morning.

  • In a more enlightened and evolved world, would we accept the proposition that poverty is the natural or entropic order of things? Is it economically reasonable but inhumane to say poverty has no causes? 79
  • Does the culture of commerce in America "dissolve sectarian hatreds" or do they persist in spite of it, untouched by the moral uplift the 18th century philosophes predicted? 84
  • Do you think life (and literal light) in the two Koreas is a good representation of the relative merits of capitalism and communism? 90 Should we also do a fly-over of a vibrant and glowing social democracy like Sweden, before concluding that capitalism per se is the best economic system?
  • Does GDP's correlation with greater longevity, health, and nutrition support a causal hypothesis? Are longevity, health, and nutrition predictors (if not causes) of greater GDP? 96
  • Will the human condition improve further if we actively promote egalitarianism? Or should our entire focus be on reducing poverty? Should we kill Boris's goat or try to get Igor his own? Or is that a false dilemma? 99
  • Is J.K. Rowling a representative billionaire? Is their wealth always or usually "a by-product of the voluntary decisions of billions of" consumers? 
  • "The influence of money on politics is particularly pernicious because it can distort every government policy, but it's not the same issue as income inequality." 102 But isn't it closely related, when money can buy inordinate influence? (See Kurt Andersen's Evil Geniuses for a deeper discussion of the link between dark money in politics and inequality.)
  • "But eventually a rising tide lifts all boats." 103 Even if true, isn't this old canard insensitive to the real-world inequities of income inequality?
  • "What's significant about the decline in inequality is that it's a decline in poverty." 105 So shouldn't we attack both inequality and poverty in tandem, de-emphasizing neither?
  • If income redistribution results in greater access to health care, affordable housing, education, etc., for those at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder, isn't it accurate to say that the goal of "raising the bottom" (and not merely lowering the top) has in fact been achieved? 107
  • Do Americans over-indulge an appetite for "golden age" nostalgia about a past that never was? 113 (Again, see Kurt Andersen's Evil Geniuses...)
  • "Walmart saved the typical American family $2,300 a year." 117 But at what total cost?
  • Does Pinker have a point about how "technology and globalization have transformed what it means to be a poor person"?
  • Is economic growth and ever-growing personal and national consumption an intrinsic good?
  • Should America institute a Universal Basic Income? 119
  • Will automatization and roboticization of menial labor eventually be a "boon to humanity"?
  • Has the environmental movement represented significant progress in the past half-century? 121
  • Was the Pope wrong about progress? 122
  • Have humans been a virus and a cancer on the planet?
  • Is worrying now about the fate of our long-term descendants really a luxury? 124
  • Will technology save us? Will the status quo doom us?
  • Do you support "sustainability"? 127
  • Is nature "as robust as it ever was," if climate change results in a less habitable world for humans and the extinction of countless species? 133
  • Should we stop calling humans out as earth's despoilers and plunderers? 134
  • Fossil fuel corporations have lied about climate change for decades. Why shouldn't we "demonize" them? 142
  • Is nuclear energy safe enough? 147
  • Do you think we will achieve an enlightened environmentalism in time to forestall the worst-case climate change scenario?  Are you conditionally or complacently optimistic? Or pessimistic? Or indifferent?
  • Are we safely past the threat of another World War?
  • Do most of the nations of the world act as if they accept that "war is illegal"? 163
  • What do you think of William James's idea, in The Moral Equivalent of War, that the "martial virtues" humans have historically associated with war ("intrepidity, contempt of softness, surrender of private interest, obedience to command"can and should be redirected to more constructive purposes?
  • Will humans ever overcome war, and inaugurate *Kant's perpetual peace? Will they join a United Federation, devoted to galactic peace?
The United Federation of Planets (abbreviated as UFP and commonly referred to as the Federation) was a supranational interstellar union of multiple planetary nation-states that operated semi-autonomously under a single central government, founded on the principles of liberty, equality, peace, justice, and progress, with the purpose of furthering the universal rights of all sentient life. Federation members exchange knowledge and resources to facilitate peaceful cooperation, scientific development, space exploration, and mutual defense.

 

Immanuel Kant
Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch

1795


PERPETUAL PEACE

Whether this satirical inscription on a Dutch innkeeper's sign upon which a burial ground was painted had for its object mankind in general, or the rulers of states in particular, who are insatiable of war, or merely the philosophers who dream this sweet dream, it is not for us to decide. But one condition the author of this essay wishes to lay down. The practical politician assumes the attitude of looking down with great self-satisfaction on the political theorist as a pedant whose empty ideas in no way threaten the security of the state, inasmuch as the state must proceed on empirical principles; so the theorist is allowed to play his game without interference from the worldly-wise statesman. Such being his attitude, the practical politician--and this is the condition I make--should at least act consistently in the case of a conflict and not suspect some danger to the state in the political theorist's opinions which are ventured and publicly expressed without any ulterior purpose. By this clausula salvatoria the author desires formally and emphatically to deprecate herewith any malevolent interpretation which might be placed on his words... (continues)




 

Enlightenment Now

 LISTEN. We're off to see my surgeons and physical therapists shortly, two weeks after dual surgery. I'm eager for their confirmation that my convalescence has been swift and that at least the more oppressive restrictions on my activity can now be loosened. 

The great advances of medical science in our time is one of Steven Pinker's large themes, as tonight we open his Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress -- the book that inspired our course. A hundred or so scientists are responsible for saving more than five billion lives! - so far. Pinker's right to indict the pervasive ingratitude/ignorance of too many of us about that. "[T]he neglect of the discoveries that transformed life for the better is an indictment of our appreciation of the modern human condition."

I think he's right, too, to say that we can measure and thus mark our progress with respect to countless indices. "...life is better than death. Health is better than sickness. Sustenance is better than hunger. Abundance is better than poverty. Peace is better than war. Safety is better than danger. Freedom is better than tyranny. Equal rights are better than bigotry and discrimination. Literacy is better than illiteracy. Knowledge is better than ignorance. Intelligence is better than dull-wittedness. Happiness is better than misery..." (continues)

Monday, June 28, 2021

Final report topics

The final report consists of a presentation and a blog post. You can post an early draft prior to your presentation if you find that helpful. Anything we've read about or discussed is fair game. If you know what you want to do, please indicate your topic in the comments space below.

The presentations should be about 15 minutes, plus discussion. Give us a couple of discussion questions, and in your blog post include links to your main sources, relevant sites, etc. (NOTE: a link is not just a URL. To embed a link, highlight a word or phrase in your text and then click on More Options in the tool bar [...], then the link icon, and paste the URL.)

A good report will tell us why your topic is relevant to the idea of enlightenment, and what you consider its most important aspects. It will (or should) provoke discussion. And it will point us in the direction of further research, should we wish to pursue the topic on our own.

Questions June 29

Post your questions and comments before Tuesday, if you can. Take a look at those Pinker videos below if you get a chance. Begin thinking about your final report topic, if you haven't already.

  • What do you think of the Spinoza epigraph? Do you see a connection to our discussion of public schools and the complaint of some in our society that they shouldn't have to subsidize the education of "other people's kids"?
  • Do you agree that pessimism, cynicism, and the ceding of purpose to religion have been long-germinating seeds of un-enlightened thinking in America?
  • Do you like Pinker's response to the student who asked "Why should I live?"
  • What do you think of Jennifer Michael Hecht's perspective on suicide?-

*“None of us can truly know what we mean to other people, and none of us can know what our future self will experience. History and philosophy ask us to remember these mysteries, to look around at friends, family, humanity, at the surprises life brings — the endless possibilities that living offers — and to persevere. There is love and insight to live for, bright moments to cherish, and even the possibility of happiness, and the chance of helping someone else through his or her own troubles. Know that people, through history and today, understand how much courage it takes to stay. Bear witness to the night side of being human and the bravery it entails, and wait for the sun. If we meditate on the record of human wisdom we may find there reason enough to persist and find our way back to happiness. The first step is to consider the arguments and evidence and choose to stay. After that, anything may happen. First, choose to stay.” Stay: A History of Suicide and the Arguments Against It by Jennifer Michael Hecht
  • Do you find dogmatic certainty "incredibly seductive"? 5 Do most people? 
  • Do Montesquieu and Xenophanes (see post below) have a point? 8
  • Do we have "an urgent need for a secular foundation for morality"? 10
  • Are you a cosmopolitan?
  • Is entropy "relevant to human affairs"? 16
  • What do you think of William James's statement to Henry Adams about entropy etc.?*
*...The "second law" is wholly irrelevant to "history"—save that it sets a terminus—for history is the course of things before that terminus, and all that the second law says is that, whatever the history, it must invest itself between that initial maximum and that terminal minimum of difference in energy-level. As the great irrigation-reservoir empties itself, the whole question for us is that of the distribution of its effects, of which rills to guide it into; and the size of the rills has nothing to do with their significance. Human cerebration is the most important rill we know of, and both the "capacity" and the "intensity" factor thereof may be treated as infinitesimal. Yet the filling of such rills would be cheaply bought by the waste of whole sums spent in getting a little of the down-flowing torrent to enter them. Just so of human institutions—their value has in strict theory nothing whatever to do with their energy-budget—being wholly a question of the form the energy flows through. Though the ultimate state of the universe may be its vital and psychical extinction, there is nothing in physics to interfere with the hypothesis that the penultimate state might be the millennium—in other words a state in which a minimum of difference of energy-level might have its exchanges so skillfully canalisés that a maximum of happy and virtuous consciousness would be the only result. In short, the last expiring pulsation of the universe's life might be, "I am so happy and perfect that I can stand it no longer." You don't believe this and I don't say I do. But I can find nothing in "Energetik" to conflict with its possibility. You seem to me not to discriminate, but to treat quantity and distribution of energy as if they formed one question... Letters of Wm James, June 17, 1910

  • Do you agree that "the ultimate purpose of life, mind, and human striving [is] to deploy energy and knowledge to fight back the tide of entropy..."? 17
  • Is it no longer reasonable to be a mind-body dualist? 22
  • Does everything happen for a reason? 24
  • Do you like Jefferson's analogy between language and light? 27
  • Can our norms and institutions rescue us from parochialism? 28
  • What's the best counter to the counter-Enlightenments of our tie? 29
  • COMMENT: "Belief in an afterlife implies that health and happiness are not such a big deal" 30
  • Do the "masses" need religion to be moral? 32
  • Do you hate the idea of progress? 39
  • Was Pangloss really a pessimist? 
  • Does the daily news cycle and our close attention to it give us a badly skewed and falsely-pessimistic perception of the state of things? 41
  • Can the "better angels of our nature" overcome greed, lust, dominance, vengeance, self-deception etc.? 45
  • Do you share the mood asymmetry of Tversky's thought experiment? Do you think it is justified by entropy? 47
  • Do you dread losses more than you look forward to gains, etc.? 48 Does this make you a pessimist by nature? Can you reverse this mindset? Do you want to?
  • Have you found that time heals most wounds?
  • Is pessimism about war an instance of innumeracy?
  • How wide is your circle of sympathy? 49 Do you think it's wider than, say, your grandparents'?
  • Is it to our credit that we no longer accept childhood bullying as natural? (Or is we  over-inclusive?)
  • Do you agree that the litany of what most of us believe (life is better than death, health is better than sickness etc.) is a clear mark of progress? 51
  • Are you surprised by the statement that "the world has made spectacular progress in every single measure of human well-being"? 52
  • Are we ignorant, pessimistic, or both when we underestimate progress in global health? 53
  • Is the Singularity (and radical life-extension) near? Will it ever be? If not, do you regret that? 61
  • What do you think of Pinker's inclusion of prayer on his list of historical quackery along with sacrifice, bloodletting etc.? 63
  • What do you think of Stephen Dunn's poetical view of prayer as talking to a more moral version of oneself? Or of Emerson's view, in Self-Reliance?*
* Prayer looks abroad and asks for some foreign addition to come through some foreign virtue, and loses itself in endless mazes of natural and supernatural, and mediatorial and miraculous. Prayer that craves a particular commodity,--any thing less than all good,--is vicious. Prayer is the contemplation of the facts of life from the highest point of view. It is the soliloquy of a beholding and jubilant soul. It is the spirit of God pronouncing his works good. But prayer as a means to effect a private end is meanness and theft. It supposes dualism and not unity in nature and consciousness. As soon as the man is at one with God, he will not beg. He will then see prayer in all action. The prayer of the farmer kneeling in his field to weed it, the prayer of the rower kneeling with the stroke of his oar, are true prayers heard throughout nature, though for cheap ends.

  • What do you think are the prospects for "a grand convergence in global health" by 2035? Will bad ideas like conspiracy and anti-vax neutralize or reverse the progress due to the good ideas inspired by science? 67
  • Is the obesity epidemic really, by historical comparison, "a good problem to have"? 69
  • Is it deplorable that most of us have never heard of Bosch and Haber, who saved 2.7 billion lives, but have heard of Kardashians and Britney Spears? 75
  • Is environmentally-motivated opposition to trans-genic crops an "indifference to starvation"? 77

Dunn's prayer

LISTEN. Yesterday was my first post-operative walk in the park. Finally got out of the driveway and over to the Richland Creek Greenway. 40 minutes, new spring in the step with not a hint of the old stenosis-related discomfort. Feels truly like a return to life, to the peripatetic life (which as I told my solicitous neighbor across the street the other morning, each of us at the end of our respective drives, is for me Life Itself).  Will check in with the medical team tomorrow and see if they don't agree I'm ready to walk my path again, an hour a day at dawn at least. Thank goodness... (continues

Rousseau

It’s the birthday of the man who wrote, “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains”: philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau (books by this author), born in Geneva in 1712. He left home at 16 and wandered around Europe for the next 14 years. He moved to Paris when he was 30 and took up with a group of philosophers. He also took up with Thérèse Le Vasseur, a semi-literate laundry maid at his hostel; the two began a lifelong relationship that produced five children, according to Rousseau. He placed all of them into orphanages.

Rousseau was well versed in music and wrote ballets and operas. He could easily have been successful as a composer, but the stage made his Swiss Calvinist sensibilities uneasy. One day he was walking to visit his friend and fellow philosopher Denis Diderot, who was in jail, and he had an epiphany: modern progress had corrupted rather than improved mankind. He became famous overnight upon publication of his essay A Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts (1750). The essay informed nearly everything else he wrote and eventually he would turn away completely from music and the theater to focus on literature.

In Discourse on the Origin of Inequality (1755) he continued to explore the theme that civilization had led to most of what was wrong with people: living in a society led to envy and covetousness; owning property led to social inequality; possessions led to poverty. Society exists to provide peace and protect those who owned property and therefore government is unfairly weighted in favor of the rich. In it, he wrote:

“The first man who, having enclosed a piece of ground, bethought himself of saying This is mine, and found people simple enough to believe him, was the real founder of civil society. From how many crimes, wars, and murders, from how many horrors and misfortunes might not any one have saved mankind, by pulling up the stakes, or filling up the ditch, and crying to his fellows: Beware of listening to this imposter; you are undone if you once forget that the fruits of the earth belong to us all, and the earth itself to nobody.”

His next two books, a criticism of the educational system (Émile) and a treatise of political philosophy (The Social Contract), both published in 1762, caused such an uproar that he fled France altogether. His work would prove inspirational to the leaders of the French Revolution and they adopted the slogan from The Social Contract: Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. WA

Saturday, June 26, 2021

No place

 LISTEN. Like the children in his novel The Brothers K, David James Duncan "was raised in the Seventh-day Adventist faith. 'I knew I was going to take on the fundamentalist upbringing. It feels natural to me to waffle between extreme reverence and extreme irreverence -- and nothing makes me feel less reverent than a church.'" nyt

But what of the Church of Baseball?

Like the late commissioner and Renaissance scholar A. Bartlett Giamatti, nothing makes me feel more reverent than a green field of the mind... (continues)
==

The speed of my recovery so far is apparently above-average, although I did have to pop a power-pill this morning at 4.

I'm reminded that there will be good days and not-so-good, on the way back to full ambulatory freedom. And apparently it'll be longer still 'til I can resume pedaling. Articles like this one in the Times ("Not All Cyclists Wear Lycra") make me itch, literally, to get my Raleigh back on the open road. Patience has never been my prime virtue. One more thing to work on... (continues)

Friday, June 25, 2021

America Is Getting Meaner

Tribalism accounts for much of the meanness of the moment.

...The underlying theme of all this meanness is intolerance.

My own better angel, currently on hiatus, tells me that the majority of people today aren't as awful as they appear on social media, which rewards hate at a high volume. But who, or what, rewards civility and nuance?

It may be, as the writer George Packer says, that the United States is headed for "a cold civil war that continues to erode democracy." No nation can survive for long without some self-evident truths as a lodestar.

There's an old saying, attributed to the Sioux: A people without history is like wind on the buffalo grass. What may be worse are a people without a heart, unable to see half their countrymen and countrywomen as anything but the enemy. nyt

Thursday, June 24, 2021

Day by day

LISTEN. ...Taking it day by day means reducing the degree of control we expect to be able to bring to bear on the uncertain future. It means recognising that we have no serious capacity to exercise our will on a span of years and should not therefore disdain a chance to secure one or two minor wins in the hours ahead of us. We should – from a new perspective – count ourselves immensely grateful if, by nightfall, there have been no further arguments and no more seizures, if the rain has let off and we have found one or two interesting pages to read.

As life as a whole grows more complicated, we can remember to unclench and smile a little along the way, rather than jealously husbanding our reserves of joy for a finale somewhere in the nebulous distance. Given the scale of what we are up against, knowing that perfection may never occur, and that far worse may be coming our way, we can stoop to accept with fresh gratitude a few of the minor gifts that are already within our grasp.

We might look with fresh energy at a cloud, a duck, a butterfly or a flower. At twenty-two, we might scoff at the suggestion – for there seem so many larger, grander things to hope for than these evanescent manifestations of nature... (continues)

Wednesday, June 23, 2021

Xenophanes & Montesquieu

“The Ethiops say that their gods are flat-nosed and black,
While the Thracians say that theirs have blue eyes and red hair.
Yet if cattle or horses or lions had hands and could draw,
And could sculpt like men, then the horses would draw their gods
Like horses, and cattle like cattle; and each they would shape
Bodies of gods in the likeness, each kind, of their own.”

“The gods did not reveal, from the beginning,
All things to us, but in the course of time
Through seeking we may learn and know things better.
But as for certain truth, no man has known it,
Nor shall he know it,neither of the gods
Nor yet of all the things of which I speak.
For even if by chance he were to utter
The final truth, he would himself not know it:
For all is but a woven web of guesses”
==
"It was reason that led most of the Enlightenment thinkers to repudiate a belief in an anthropomorphic God who took an interest in human affairs. The application of reason revealed that reports of miracles were dubious, that the authors of holy books were all too human, that natural events unfolded with no regard to human welfare, and that different cultures believed in mutually incompatible deities, none of them less likely than the others to be products of the imagination. (As Montesquieu wrote, “If triangles had a god they would give him three sides.”) For all that, not all of the Enlightenment thinkers were atheists. Some were deists (as opposed to theists): they thought that God set the universe in motion and then stepped back, allowing it to unfold according to the laws of nature. Others were pantheists, who used “God” as a synonym for the laws of nature. But few appealed to the law-giving, miracle-conjuring, son-begetting God of scripture." Enlightenment Now, p.8.

Reasons to live

“Why should I live?” The student’s ingenuous tone made it clear that she was neither suicidal nor sarcastic but genuinely curious about how to find meaning and purpose if traditional religious beliefs about an immortal soul are undermined by our best science. My policy is that there is no such thing as a stupid question, and to the surprise of the student, the audience, and most of all myself, I mustered a reasonably creditable answer. What I recall saying—embellished, to be sure, by the distortions of memory and l’esprit de l’escalier, the wit of the staircase—went something like this... (continues)

Tuesday, June 22, 2021

Ages and stages

 LISTEN. As we close Susan Neiman's Why Grow Up? in Enlightenment tonight I'm most drawn to her late discussion of *Shakespeare and the respective ages and stages of human life. All the world's a stage for sure, but like Neiman I prefer to think of us players as improv artists rather than scripted drones. Resistance to an age of immaturity and imbecility is not futile. Thinking and acting courageously on the basis of our own reasoned understanding is the thing. The play's conclusion is not yet writ... (continues)

Freedom

"Freedom is the will to be responsible for ourselves."
Friedrich Nietzsche
(https://twitter.com/philosophytweet/status/1407321109444415496?s=02)

Monday, June 21, 2021

How to corrupt a youth

The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.
(https://twitter.com/PureNietzsche/status/1407102899587588099?s=02)

Dr. Daryl's craftsmanship

 Some of Professor Hale's recent handiwork. He well illustrates Rousseau's point about the value of learning and practicing a craft. Maybe all philosophers should be required to build something, before being awarded a graduate degree.

 

 







Mad Man

 Neiman's discussion (and ours) of advertizing culture and "creativity" gives me an excuse to look again at the wonderfully satisfying ending of Mad Men, with Don Draper hatching a brilliant new campaign up at Big Sur. What else would a raised consciousness be good for in America, after all, if not for a lucrative new consumer pitch? I don't consider Don particularly enlightened, myself. Clever and well-suited to capitalist "success," sure. (And Jon Hamm is from my alma mater Mizzou, btw. His best friend was new MLB Hall of Famer Ted Simmons' son too.)

 

Anybody have a favorite Darrin scene?




Clarity

 The imposed post-operative downtime that has me confined largely to quarters (no long dogwalks, bikerides, swims etc.) has led to a few moments of clarity, insight, and resolve. 

To name one: I'm clear now that I can improve the quality of my days, hence my life, if I skip several of my habitual internet pit-stops and stop "following" certain social media attention hogs I've wasted time and mental energy on. I followed because they are philosophers, nominally and in the modern academic sense anyway, who sometimes say things that amuse or bemuse or provoke in ways that seem constructive at the time but dissolve in retrospect. Scrolling from one such provocation to the next can seem rewarding or gratifying, but the time thus spent leaves barely a residue of valuable information. Never mind wisdom... (continues)

Saturday, June 19, 2021

Steven Pinker

Looking ahead... 

 

The Enlightenment "worked", says Steven Pinker. By promoting reason, science, humanism, progress, and peace, the programs set in motion by the 18th-Century intellectual movement became so successful we’ve lost track of what that success came from. Some even discount the success itself, preferring to ignore or deny how much better off humanity keeps becoming, decade after decade, in terms of health, food, money, safety, education, justice, and opportunity. The temptation is to focus on the daily news, which is often dire, and let it obscure the long term news, which is shockingly good. This is the 21st Century, not the 18th, with different problems and different tools. What are Enlightenment values and programs for now? "A New Enlightenment" was given on March 13, 02018 as part of Long Now's Seminar series. The series was started in 02003 to build a compelling body of ideas about long-term thinking from some of the world's leading thinkers. The Seminars take place in San Francisco and are curated and hosted by Stewart Brand. To follow the talks, you can: Subscribe to our podcasts: http://longnow.org/seminars/podcast Explore the full series: http://longnow.org/seminars More ideas on long-term thinking: http://blog.longnow.org

 

 


...The idea that Mr. Pinker, a liberal, Jewish psychology professor, is a fan of a racist, anti-Semitic online movement is absurd on its face, so it might be tempting to roll your eyes and dismiss this blowup as just another instance of social media doing what it does best: generating outrage...



Blaise Pascal, science and spirit


"In its encounter with Nature, science invariably elicits a sense of reverence and awe. The very act of understanding is a celebration of joining, merging, even if on a very modest scale, with the magnificence of the Cosmos. And the cumulative worldwide build-up of knowledge over time converts science into something only a little short of a trans-national, trans-generational meta-mind.

“Spirit” comes from the Latin word “to breathe.” What we breathe is air, which is certainly matter, however thin. Despite usage to the contrary, there is no necessary implication in the word “spiritual” that we are talking of anything other than matter (including the matter of which the brain is made), or anything outside the realm of science... Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality. When we recognize our place in an immensity of light years and in the passage of ages, when we grasp the intricacy, beauty and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling, that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual. So are our emotions in the presence of great art or music or literature, or of acts of exemplary selfless courage such as those of Mohandas Gandhi or Martin Luther King Jr. The notion that science and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both." Carl Sagan


The Varieties of Scientific Experience: Carl Sagan on Science and Spirituality-Maria Popova, Brainpickings

“If we ever reach the point where we think we thoroughly understand who we are and where we came from, we will have failed.”


Friday, June 18, 2021

The project continues


Kant & a new enlightenment

Critique should replace dogma, not become a new dogma itself... 

 

An intro to Kant’s philosophy, (and why should we learn about Kant anyway?) #Kant #philosophy #englightenment Please skip to 13:44 for the second part (Why we Need a New Enlightenment) if you think you already have a good understanding of Kant's philosophy. But it is still recommended to watch the whole video to ensure that we are on the same page. 0:00 Kant's Philosophy 13:44 Why We Need a New Enlightenment Another video about Kant: BAD Philosophy Videos! (Philosophy Tube on Kant's Philosophy): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocxRr... Kant’s Ethics: Homophobia, Child Killing--and Derek Chauvin: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrB5X... Sources: “Critique is not opposed to the dogmatic procedure of reason (…)” (Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, Bxxxv) the (critical) “subjective investigation of reason itself” precedes “any objective and dogmatic investigation of things” (Kant, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics 42) a “preceding critique of reason’s own ability” (Kant, Critique of Pure Reason Bxxxv) “We can also grant the theology faculty’s proud claim that the philosophy faculty is its handmaid (though the question remains, whether the servant is the mistress’s torchbearer or trainbearer), provided it is not driven away or silenced.” (Kant, Conflict of Faculties, http://la.utexas.edu/users/hcleaver/3...) “A critique is not a matter of saying that things are not right as they are. It is a matter of pointing out on what kinds of assumptions, what kinds of familiar, unchallenged, unconsidered modes of thought, the practices that we accept rest (…) Criticism is (…) to show that things are not as self-evident as we believed, to see that what is accepted as self-evident will no longer be accepted as such. Practicing criticism is a matter of making facile gestures difficult.” (M. Foucault, “Practicing criticism, or, is it really important to think?”, interview by Didier Eribon, May 30-31, 1981, in Politics, Philosophy, Culture, ed. L. Kriztman (1988), p. 154) “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” (Declaration of Independence, U.S.A.) Walter Benn Michaels, The Trouble with Diversity”: https://prospect.org/features/trouble... Walter Benn Michaels, Adolph Reed Jr., “The Trouble with Disparity”: https://nonsite.org/the-trouble-with-... ---- Dr Hans-Georg Moeller is a professor in the Philosophy and Religious Studies Program at the University of Macau.

Convalescing

UPDATE, Friday morning. Home since Thursday afternoon, once the physical therapist signed off. Had wonderful care at St. Thomas midtown, many thanks to the personable and patient nursing staff there. And thanks of course to family and friends for your expressions of moral support and encouragement. Still hurts like hell, but Younger Daughter's a terrific nurse/chef so I'm mending as fast as humanly possible. I'm finding the nature videos on YouTube a comfort... (continues)


Wednesday, June 16, 2021

Speaking Truth to Both the Right and the Left

George Packer’s “Last Best Hope” and Jonathan Rauch’s “The Constitution of Knowledge” argue that Trump die-hards and the woke both threaten democracy.

Like many public intellectuals who are worth reading, George Packer and Jonathan Rauch don’t toe a predictable line in American political and intellectual debate. They despise Donald Trump and the disinformation-heavy discord he has spawned. But they don’t share all the views of progressives, either, as they’ve come to be defined in many left-leaning spaces. Packer and Rauch are here to defend the liberalism of the Enlightenment — equality and scientific rationality in an unapologetically Western-tradition sense. They see this belief system as the country’s great and unifying strength, and they’re worried about its future...
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/14/books/review/george-packer-last-best-hope-jonathan-rauch-the-constitution-of-knowledge.html?smid=em-share

Tuesday, June 15, 2021

Questions June 22

 Post your questions and comments before Tuesday if possible.

LISTEN. WGU Part 3 

  • What are some other signs of being grown-up, besides the ability to think for yourself? 123

  • Should corporations like Coca-Cola be allowed to have "pouring rights" in public schools? 132

  • "You must take your education into your own hands as soon as possible." Did you? How? How will you  (or have you) communicated this imperative to your children? 140
  • Should the age of legal maturity be raised to match the age of brain maturity? 140
  • Are you willing to go a month without internet? 148
  • Were Augustine and Rousseau right about travel? 150-51
  • Do you hope to live and work one day in another culture for at least a year? (Or have you already?) Do you think it will contribute to your maturity? 162-3
  • Was Locke's "sweet" labor theory of value invalidated by the invention of money? 166
  • Do we have a duty to our own humanity to work? 167
  • Was Arendt correct about the distinction between labor and work, and about their rootedness  in natality? 168-9
  • Was Rousseau right about the value of learning to work with your hands, particularly carpentry?  172
  • Do you worry, as Paul Goodman did, that there may be "no decent work to grow up for"? 173
  • Is it a "travesty" to call people who work in advertising "creatives"? 175
  • Is consumer capitalism infantilizing?
  • Do you regularly discard "unfashionable" clothes or other goods before they wear out or break down? Should you? 179
  • Do you want to produce something of value? Why? 181
  • Do you expect to find meaning in your work? If not, where will you find it? 185
  • "Children make more compliant subjects and consumers." 193 Are we a nation of children, in this sense? 
  • Do you know any adults who never grew up, or who say they admire Peter Pan, or who are "young at heart" and "open to the world"? 194 Or any young people who missed out on the joys of childhood? 
  • Do you wish you looked older than you do? Why?
  • Is life like a journey in Neurath's boat? 196
  • "Maturity cannot be commanded, it must be desired." 198 Do you desire it?
  • "I wish I'd known enough to ask my teachers the right questions before they died." 198 Do you (now) have questions for people it's too late to ask? 
  • "Most people grow happier as they grow older." 198 Does this surprise you?
  • "Growing up means realizing that no time of one's life is the best one," just as each season of the year brings its own unique joys. 202 "To be interested in the changing seasons is, in this middling zone, a happier state of mind than to be hopelessly in love with spring." (George Santayana) Do you agree?
  • Do you understand what Kant meant by saying you have duties to yourself? 203
  • Have you yet discovered the pleasures of generativity and generosity? 204
  • Do you know anyone who treats people as means to their own ends? 206 Do you want to?
  • Did you grow up in "a home filled with good books and articulate people"? 209 Do you intend to provide such a home for your children? 
  • If musicians and bilingual speakers have more neural connections than others, why aren't music and languages more heavily emphasized in our schools? 210
  • Do you see college as an opportunity to "expand your judgment and enlarge your mind"? 213
  • Is "think for yourself" necessarily vague? 215
  • Are you glad you didn't live before the Enlightenment, when your life would have been largely determined by your father's (and his, and his...)? 216
  • Do you agree with Leibniz, that most people would choose on their deathbed to live their lives again only on the condition that they would be different next time? 
  • Do you prefer Nietzsche's version of eternal recurrence (220), or Bill Murray's in Groundhog Day, or Hume's preference for the next ten years and not the last (221), or none of the above? 
  • Do you enjoy the music of any older popular musicians (Dylan, Springsteen...)? 225
  • "The fear of growing up is less a fear of dying than a fear of life itself." 230 Agree?
  • Was Shakespeare really saying life sucks and then you die? Or was he mocking that view?


  •  

Monday, June 14, 2021

Questions June 14

WGU Part 2 ( -p.122). We're zooming on Monday night this week, I have a date with the surgeons Tuesday and Wednesday. Please post your questions, comments, and short essays on this section before Monday if possible.

  • Is Hannah Arendt's emphasis on natality as important as mortality, in defining the human condition? Would it still be, if we ever achieved natural immortality? 80-81
  • Is the US still a proud nation of immigrants, or more like those European nations "struggling with what they regard as the problem of immigration? 81
  • Are there ways other than travel to "experience the world as babies do" etc.? 83
  • Did your upbringing make it easier or harder for you to trust? 86
  • "Once you start asking why, there's no natural place to stop." 88 So why do so many people stop, or else never start?
  • How long (or how inattentively) would we have to live, to see this as Leibniz's "best possible world"? 89
  • Was Hume right about reason being slave to the passions? 93
  • Was Thrasymachus right about justice? 94
  • Do you agree with the cliche about socialism? 100
  • Is Hume's strategy for dispelling melancholy a good one? 104
  • Has the gap between ought and is narrowed in the world, historically?107
  • Was Nietzsche right about stoicism? 113
  • Is it childish to expect the world to make sense? 114
  • How can philosophy help us grow up? 119
  • Do we have a right to happiness? 122

Sparkle

LISTEN. Enlightenment class meets a day early this week because tomorrow and Wednesday I have a date with destiny-aka Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion. OLIF sounds like a benign old Nordic friend. I hope it will be.

The second long Chapter (or short Part) of Why Grow Up is rich with topics of interest, beginning with Hannah Arendt's natality, a natural but under-appreciated complement to the philosophers' more commonplace preoccupation with mortality. Birth is the ultimate renewal of life, and it happens every second. With every new human the world gets an infusion of hope and, who knows, maybe redemption. And there's only one rule: you've got to be kind. Well, except for all the other Kantian rules we give ourselves in order to set ourselves free. "Human reason gives itself the moral law, which is our basis for belief in God, freedom, and immortality..."-SEP (Having trouble with Kant? You're not the only one...)

Sunday, June 13, 2021

How Humans Gained an ‘Extra Life’

Steven Pinker: In Steven Johnson’s latest book, he looks at what he calls “one of the greatest achievements in the history of our species,” that life spans have more than doubled since the mid-19th century.

As you read of the many contemporary threats to life and limb, from pollution to shooting rampages, you may long for a simpler and safer yesteryear. But if the conditions of the past prevailed today, you would probably be dead. The average age of a New York Times subscriber is around 55, and for most of human history, life expectancy was around 30. At least one of your children would probably be dead, too. Until a couple of centuries ago, more than a quarter of children died before their first birthday, around half before their fifth.

...Starting in the second half of the 19th century, the average life span began to climb rapidly, giving humans not just extra life, but an extra life. In rich countries, life expectancy at birth hit 40 by 1880, 50 by 1900, 60 by 1930, 70 by 1960, and 80 by 2010. The rest of the world is catching up. Global life expectancy in 2019 was 72.6 years, higher than that of any country, rich or poor, in 1950. People in the shortest-lived countries today will, on average, outlive those of your grandparents’ generation... nyt

Whiffs and gleams

A reflection on what William James called "the deeper mystery and tragedy of life," and seeing the light with regard to the imbibing of spirits...

LISTEN. What a fine Friday afternoon in June, in a pre-pandemic, quotidian-normal sort of way. If all the days are (or could be) gods, as Emerson said, yesterday was exceptional. Exalted. Crowning. 

It was highlighted first by the three-dimensional presence and unmediated, unmasked company of a good friend over lunch at M.L. Rose. We've zoomed often during the contagion, but conversing face-to-face for the first time since March 2020 was a gratifying reminder of why immediacy matters. 

Later, while he endured Nashville gridlock I had a pleasant swim and did not take it for granted. After Monday I'm prohibited by the protocols of surgery from immersing in H20.

And then we went out to a ballgame, wife and Younger Daughter and I. First live game with the crowd since Spring Training 2020 just before they cancelled it. William Carlos Williams was right, the crowd at the ballgame is moved by a spirit of uselessness which delights them ... (continues)

Saturday, June 12, 2021

How to Think Outside Your Brain

The days when we could do it all in our heads are over.

...Our efforts at education and training, as well as management and leadership, are aimed principally at promoting brain-bound thinking. Beginning in elementary school, we are taught to sit still, work quietly, think hard — a model for mental activity that will dominate during the years that follow, through high school and college and into the workplace. [What would Rousseau say?]

The skills we develop and the techniques we are taught are mostly those that involve using our individual, unaided brains: committing information to memory, engaging in internal reasoning and deliberation, mustering our mental powers from within. Compared to the attention we lavish on the brain, we expend relatively little effort on cultivating our ability to think outside the brain.

The limits of this approach have become painfully evident. The days when we could do it all in our heads are over. Our knowledge is too abundant, our expertise too specialized, our challenges too enormous. The best chance we have to thrive in the extraordinarily complex world we’ve created is to allow that world to assume some of our mental labor. Our brains can’t do it alone.

nyt

Friday, June 11, 2021

Future Rising

LISTEN. "The really vital question for us all is, What is this world going to be? What is life eventually to make of itself?" Pragmatism III

If Sapere Aude is the motto of enlightenment, that's the question it's motivated by.

Enlightenment is a state of mind, a commitment to learning for the sake of doing, and doing for the purpose of ameliorating the human condition, alleviating suffering, pursuing happiness, offering some form of hope and expectation for the future of life... (continues)

Thursday, June 10, 2021

Plato's cave 2.0



https://t.co/h21VbPrFLL
(https://twitter.com/carl_b_sachs/status/1402326601434599427?s=02

Socrates - GLAUCON And now, I said, let me show in a figure how far our nature is enlightened or unenlightened: --Behold! human beings living in a underground den, which has a mouth open towards the light and reaching all along the den; here they have been from their childhood, and have their legs and necks chained so that they cannot move, and can only see before them, being prevented by the chains from turning round their heads. Above and behind them a fire is blazing at a distance, and between the fire and the prisoners there is a raised way; and you will see, if you look, a low wall built along the way, like the screen which marionette players have in front of them, over which they show the puppets. I see. And do you see, I said, men passing along the wall carrying all sorts of vessels, and statues and figures of animals made of wood and stone and various materials, which appear over the wall? Some of them are talking, others silent. You have shown me a strange image, and they are strange prisoners. Like ourselves, I replied... (continues)

Plato, Republic VII