Up@dawn 2.0 (blogger)

Delight Springs

Wednesday, February 10, 2021

MIDTERM REPORT PRESENTATIONS

We'll begin in March with 3 or 4 ten-minute presentations per class. If you have a topic preference, indicate it in a comment below. (Include your section #.) Otherwise, topics will be assigned. Post your request by Feb 24, the complete schedule will be announced here Friday the 26th. Everyone in each section should have a different topic, or at least focus on a different aspect of their topic (coordinate your report with classmates working on similar topics, to avoid redundancy).

Some possible topics:
  • George Berkeley's idealistic empiricism
  • David Hume's skeptical empiricism
  • Leibniz vs. Voltaire and the "best of possible worlds"
  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau's social contract
  • Immanel Kant's "Copernican Revolution"
  • Immanuel Kant's "Categorical Imperative"
  • Jeremy Bentham's "Felicific Calculus"
  • Hegel's "Zeitgeist"
  • Arthur Schopenhauer's Pessimistic Philosophy 
  • John Stuart Mill's On Liberty
  • Charles Darwin's impact on philosophy
  • Soren Kierkegaard's "Leap of Faith"
  • Karl Marx's utopian vision
  • Charles Sanders Peirce's pragmatic philosophy 
  • William James's pragmatism
  • Nietzsche's"Ubermensch"
  • Nietzsche's "Eternal Recurrence"
  • Freud's theory of the unconscious and dream symbolism
  • Bertrand Russell's "Why I Am Not a Christian"
  • Bertrand Russell's "Conquest of Happiness"
  • A.J. Ayer's Logical Positivism
  • Jean-Paul Sartre's Existentialism
  • Simone de Beauvoir's Feminist Existentialism and "The Second Sex"
  • Albert Camus's Myth of Sisyphus
  • John Rawls's Theory of Justice
  • Alan Turing and Artificial Intelligence
  • Peter Singer's ethics
  • [Topics in How the World Thinks, Fantasyland]
Your report should tell us more about your topic than is mentioned in our texts. In other words, do some research. You can share your screen and show us a powerpoint or prezi (etc.) or video excerpt, if you like... or you can just talk to us, extemporaneously or from notes or a script. 

In addition to the presentation, post a brief summary including sources (which you can cite via hyperlinks embedded in your text) and a couple of discussion questions. You're in charge of the discussion, during and/or after your presentation. Have fun, and teach us something.

You'll need to become an author on the CoPhi site prior to your presentation date, so you can post your summary. Send me an email to request an author invitation. Phil.Oliver@mtsu.edu.

And it should go without saying: when presenting, turn your camera on.
==

MIDTERM REPORT PRESENTATIONS

Mar 2 #4 Haven, Leibniz/Voltaire; Austin, Locke’s social contract; Caleb Conder, George Berkeley’s idealistic empiricism; James Currie, David Hume’s skeptical empiricism. #7 Jacob, George Berkeley; William W., Leibniz/Voltaire; Branesha, David Hume; Nicholas, Rousseau’s Social Contract. #8 John, George Berkeley; Kyla, David Hume; Jasmine G, Leibniz/Voltaire; Noah, Rousseau’s Social Contract

Mar 4 (Kant, Bentham, Hegel, Schopenhauer) #4 Kassidy, Schopenhauer; Ashley Wagner, Kant; Justin C., Bentham; Urielle, Hegel. #7 Paroh, Schopenhauer's pessimism; Janai, Kant; Koltin, Bentham; Alexis, Hegel. #8 Cameron, Kant; _____, Bentham; Colby, Hegel; Jonathan, Schopenhauer

T 9 Mill, Darwin, Kierkegaard, Marx-LH 24-27, FL 21-22, HWT 23-24. #4 Gracie, Marx's vision; Patrick S, Mill; Archie, Kierkegaard; Karter S, Darwin. #7 Vernon, Kierkegaard’s “Leap”; Sydney, Marim, Darwin's impact; Andrew, Marx's vision; Aaron, Mill. #8 Aalayis, Darwin; Joshua, Kierkegaard's "Leap of Faith"; Patrick, Karl Marx's Utopian Vision; Andrew L., Mill.

Th 11 Peirce & James, Nietzsche, Freud-LH 28-30, FL 23-24, HWT 25-26. #4 Prophetess, Nietzsche's Eternal Recurrence; Brandon, Nietzsche’s Ubermensch; Graham, Peirce; Kendall, Freud. #7 Austin, Nietzsche; Raegan, Freud; Caitlin, Wm James; #8 Matthew, Nietzsche's "Eternal Recurrence"; Sean, Nietzsche’s Ubermensch; Keylee, Nietzsche on morality; Rebecca, Freud

Mar 23 (Russell, Ayer, Sartre, de Beauvoir, Camus) #4 Chloe, Bertrand Russell's "Why I Am Not a Christian"; Jasmine, Russell’s Conquest of Happiness; Dylan, Sartre’s Existentialism; Ashley, Simone de Beauvoir's feminist existentialism #7 Morgan, Russell's Conquest of Happiness; Ash Warner, Sartre’s Existentialism; Kallie, Ayer; Porter, Camus #8 Pai Ning, "Why I am Not a Christian" by Bertrand Russell; Derica, Russell’s Conquest of Happiness; Amanual, A.J.Ayer; Ivan, Camus

Mar 25 (Wittgenstein, Arendt, Popper & Kuhn, Foot & Thomson) #4 Tyanna, Wittgenstein; Matah, Hannah Arendt; Alayna, Popper's & Kuhn's philosophy of science; Lisa, Foot's & Thompson's thought experiments #7 Ahmad, Wittgenstein; Karson, Hannah Arendt; Ryan, “deterritorialization”; Austin D., Foot's & Thompson's thought experiments #8 Kevin Pierce, Wittgenstein (or Socrates?); Liam, Hannah Arendt (or Cosmic Philosophy); Connor, Pascal’s Wager

Mar 30 (Rawls, Turing & Searle, Singer) #4 Jacob, Alan Turing and Artificial Intelligence; Ethan, Rawls's Justice; Kirolos, Peter Singer; Ernest, Emptiness; #7 Renee, John Rawls & racial inequality/justice; Chris H., Turing & AI; Haley, Peter Singer; Kendra, Gnostic Christians on evil #8 William, Rawls; Carter, Turing & AI; Kelvin, Hector Zagal & Aristotle

April 1 (FL 31-32, WGU -p.122) #4; Sheeven, "Wild" religion (see FL ch.31); Morgan K., Religion in America (see FL ch.32); Dylan, Natality and mortality (see WGU ch.2); Alexondra, Peripatetic philosophy (see Gymnasiums of the Mind) #7 & #8 If you missed your presentation date and would still like to present (and have been approved to do so), you may present your report today.

82 comments:

  1. Renee Hooper - Section 7

    I would like to do my report on Racial Inequality - Is that an option?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I should have been more specific - Racial Inequality in Justice. I plan on researching John Rawls.

      Delete
  2. Yes, perhaps related to one of our textual discussions of inequality & racism etc. (there are some in Fantasyland), or to one of the philosophers who was explicitly concerned with questions of justice (such as John Rawls), or to MLK Jr. and his views on civil disobedience (see his Letter From Birmingham Jail, for instance).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Section 7
    I think I would like to do Bertrand Russell’s or the artificial intelligence.
    Is it one topic per person or can multiple people have the same topic? I'm just wondering if I have to make a decision now so I don't loose my preference s.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can I actually do my report on the beliefs of the gnostic christians and their ways of explaining evil in the world?

      Delete
    2. Yes, gnostic christians and evil is fine. And yes, everyone should have a different topic...or at least a different aspect of their topic.

      Delete
  4. Section 8- Freud's theory on the unconscious and dream symbolism

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Possibly helpful-
      https://philosophynow.org/issues/68/Psychoanalysis_and_Philosophy_I

      Delete
  5. Section 4 -Karl Marx's utopian vision

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. An article from Philosophy Now-
      https://philosophynow.org/issues/131/Karl_Marx_Man_and_Mind

      Delete
  6. Section 7 - I would like to do Karl Marks utopian vison

    ReplyDelete
  7. Section 7
    I would like to do my presentation on Charles Darwin's impact on philosophy.

    ReplyDelete
  8. section 7
    Charles Darwin's impact on philosophy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sydney actually already claimed Darwin, but if you'll coordinate your reports to avoid redundancy and emphasize different aspects of Darwin's impact you can both do it.

      Delete
  9. May I do Bertrand Russell's "Conquest of Happiness"
    Morgan Farmby section 7

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You'll probably want to pick one chapter to focus on...

      https://russell-j.com/beginner/COH-TEXT.HTM

      Maria Popova has an interesting discussion of it: https://www.brainpickings.org/2015/01/21/bertrand-russell-boredom-conquest-of-happiness/

      Delete
  10. Section 7 -- I'd like Nietzsche's Ubermensch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Here's an article you might find useful-
      https://philosophynow.org/issues/93/Nietzsches_Ubermensch_A_Hero_of_Our_Time

      Delete
  11. Section 7

    I would like to do my presentation on William James's pragmatism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good, I'd start with Lecture 1 in his book of the same name-
      https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/James/James_1907/James_1907_01.html

      Delete
    2. Thank you sir, I'll be sure to read it! Hope you had a wonderful birthday!

      Delete
  12. Section 8- Charles Darwin's impact on philosophy

    ReplyDelete
  13. Section 4- Alan Turing and Artificial Intelligence

    ReplyDelete
  14. Pai Ning from section 008.
    I would like to do "Why I am Not a Christian" by Bertrand Russell.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Matthew Wells, section 8

    I'd like to do Nietzsche's "Eternal Recurrence"

    ReplyDelete
  16. Liam Curran, Section 8 and I remember during our alien discussion in class on thursday you had mentioned that someone could do their presentation on cosmic philosophy and if that's still possible I'd like to that to be my topic.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Section 8

    I would like to research and present Soren Kierkegaard's "Leap of Faith" for my presentation.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Section 8

    I would like to do Karl Marx's Utopian Vision.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Prophetess Turner. Section 4. Nietzsche's "Eternal Recurrence"

    ReplyDelete
  20. section 7

    I would like to do Arthur Schopenhauer's pessimistic theory for my presentation

    ReplyDelete
  21. Section 4
    I would like to do Freud's theory on the unconscious and dream symbolism

    ReplyDelete
  22. Section 4

    May I do: Bertrand Russell's "Why I Am Not a Christian"?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes... https://russell-j.com/beginner/COH-TEXT.HTM

      Maria Popova has an interesting discussion of it: https://www.brainpickings.org/2015/01/21/bertrand-russell-boredom-conquest-of-happiness/

      Delete
  23. Replies
    1. Patrick has already claimed that topic. Do you want to do some other aspect of Marx?

      Delete
    2. what other aspect of Marx would I be able to do?

      Delete
    3. Do I have another topic option?

      Delete
  24. section #4 I would like Nietzsche's"Ubermensch"

    ReplyDelete
  25. #4 I would like to do John Rawls's Theory of Justice.

    ReplyDelete
  26. #8 I would like to do Nietzsche's Ubermensch if possible

    ReplyDelete
  27. Raegan Faught
    I would like to do my presentation on Freud's theory of the unconscious and dream symbolism

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sorry forgot to put I'm section #7

      Delete
  28. Section #4: I would like to do Charles Sanders Peirce's pragmatic philosophy for my midterm report

    ReplyDelete
  29. Section #7 Jean-Paul Sartre's Existentialism

    ReplyDelete
  30. #8 Bertrand Russell "The Conquest of Happiness"

    ReplyDelete
  31. Section 8
    I would like to do John Rawls's Theory of Justice

    ReplyDelete
  32. Section 8
    I would like to do Nietzsche's "Ubermensch".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, that's already taken. Please make another selection.

      Delete
    2. Is Jean Paul Sartre still available for Section 8?

      Delete
  33. Section 7
    I would like to do Soren Kierkegaard's "Leap of Faith"

    ReplyDelete
  34. I would like to do my report on "Emptiness"

    ReplyDelete
  35. Section 8

    I would like to present on the topic of Blaise Pascal’s Wager of God’s existence and Human’s Beliefs

    ReplyDelete
  36. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Section 4

    I would like to do my presentation on Bertrand Russell's "Conquest of Happiness"

    ReplyDelete
  38. Section 7
    I would like to do my presentation on Freud's theory of the unconscious and dream symbolism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, that's already taken. Please make another selection. (And please identify yourself.)

      Delete
  39. Kassidy Judkins, Section 4.
    I would like to do my presentation on Arthur Schopenhauer's Pessimistic Philosophy.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Kevin Pierce, Section 8.
    I would like to do my presentation on Soren Kierkegaard Leap of faith. 3 stages of life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, that's already taken. Please make another selection.

      Delete
    2. can I do my on presentation on Socrates?

      Delete
  41. Keylee Crutcher Section 8:
    I pick Nietzsche’s morals (master morality and slave morality and/or just focusing on how he believes there to be no objective morals)

    I asked you in class for another topic about Nietzsche and you said pick a text besides the 2 already picked- I decided to do his views/arguments about morals since that’s what you suggested and I looked it up and found it intriguing.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Haven Word , Section 4:
    I would like to do my report on "Leibniz vs. Voltaire and the "best of possible worlds"

    ReplyDelete
  43. I would like to do Jean-Paul Sartre's existentialism
    Section 4

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, that's already taken. Please make another selection.

      Delete
  44. If possible, I would like to do my report on John Locke and his "social contract."

    Section 4

    ReplyDelete
  45. I would like to do George Berkeley's idealistic empiricism
    section 7

    ReplyDelete
  46. Section 7, Ryan Crist
    Could I do my report on Deleuze's concept of deterritorialization?

    ReplyDelete
  47. Section #8 Kelvin Luna:

    Would like to report about a philosopher named Hector Zagal and learn about how he is influenced by Aristotle's philosophy. I would also like to know how the same country where I'm from, impacted as a philosopher.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Could I do my project on Jean-Paul Sartre's Existentialism?

    ReplyDelete
  49. My presentation was on Leibniz vs. Voltaire and their views of the "best possible worlds". Leibniz believes that we live in the best possible world now because God created it. Voltaire believes the total opposite in the sense that the world is full of terrors and atrocities so this can't be the best possible world. Actually, Voltaire mocks religion in general. He made it a point to mock religious hierarchy.

    Discussion questions:

    If you were reading this with no bias at all, who would be more compelling?

    Do you find Leibniz’s philosophical view on God and how he created the world to be impactful to readers?

    Do you find Voltaire’s novel that includes real tragedies to have an impact on readers?

    Does Voltaire going to prison twice and starting conspiracies of incest between a public figure and his daughter denounce his reputation as a philosopher?

    Lastly, does Leibniz having a college doctorate of law and Voltaire being lost in the world of theater matter when it comes to arguments such as this? And if so, how?

    ReplyDelete
  50. Schopenhauer’s Pessimism (Summary by Jonathan Pope)
    Arthur Schopenhauer was German philosopher most known for his pessimistic views. Schopenhauer was also known for his atheism. Schopenhauer idealizes that by being optimistic you’re more prone to getting hurt or upset when things don’t go your way. And that being pessimistic feels more factual. This is because being a pessimist causes you to expect nothing, so when something does happen you feel more grateful and take it for fact. People primarily see pessimism as defeated attitude, when it’s more of a realist attitude. He conveys that complete optimists often grow up to suffer from various mental health issues such as depression, anxiety, etc. This is because when let down, the optimists whole view has to change and conform to the fact that something did not go their way. A person showered in wealth with a cemented optimistic way of thinking lives a life with no meaning, knows not of struggle. A pessimist showered in wealth can become diluted over time to their more-humble selves and become the optimist. This is called an optimism overdose. A part of Schopenhauer’s philosophy was his idea of the human “will”. His idea is that humanity is based upon the idea that we all have a common will to reproduce. It’s a primal concept of sorts. He also considers music to be the best way to see the true essence of the world. Studies were done at Stanford University, and they concluded Baroque music is proven to heighten awareness and intelligence in the listener. I personally think it’s somewhat coincidental that the music of his time is baroque and his views on the world we live in as wretched.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWYuV4SdwNc

    ReplyDelete
  51. Thanks for sharing that link, Jonathan, it provides real insight into the mind and heart of the philosopher.

    ReplyDelete
  52. It is important to know the background of the philosopher since it gives us a good insight into what they believed, why they believed it, and how they came across that thought. Charles Darwin lived between 1809-1882. It is important to mention that at the time of Darwin there was a church that had a strong belief in Christianity and a god. He was a naturalist and a biologist. I am aware that not all students may know what a naturalist is in the eyes of philosophy. A naturalist a person that in natural laws and forces, they do they not believe in supernatural forced within the universe. Darwin is credited for his discovery of natural selection and evolution. Basically, his ideology is that us humans as well as other creatures came from common ancestors and only the fittest make it. The weaker ones and less dominant die off and soon become extinct. Let's bring the church back. Darwin brought this finding in a time of Christianity. As you would imagine, his findings were frowned upon. The idea of we all came from an assertor and not a god was completely against what the church has been teaching people. However, his finding was scientifically proven. It was from that moment forward that the science of evolution and god were put against each other. Darwin made us aware of our place in the evolutionary process. he made it clear that only the fittest move forward. dawrin had an effect on society and the way we decided to grow. The ones that are able to adapt, eat, not be food, and reproduce are the ones that move forward. It would make since why us humans are always trying to find a way to grow and be more powerful. We are always trying to grow our population. We developed weapons to protect ourselves, we created the science of medicine to help fight off any diseases.

    Discussion questions:
    How do you think life would be different if Darwin’s ideology never came along?
    If you were in Darwin's place, would you release the information you found out even though most people of the church would be against it?
    How has Darwin's ideology affected our lives today?
    How has Darwinism affected history? You may think politically/ societal structures.
    There are starting to be evidence of the bible and the stories within it. How does this clash with Darwinism? Does this make Darwinism and less true or less believable?

    ReplyDelete
  53. Section 8

    My presentation is on Karl Marx and his vision on an utopia. Karl Marx was born on May 5,1818. He died on March 14, 1883. Karl Marx was a German philosopher, economist, historian, sociologist, political theorist, journalist and socialist revolutionary. I talked about what Karl Marx found wrong about the economy. Most specifically a capitalist economy. In "Communist Manifesto,"Karl Marx thought a perfect world would be one a world without private property or inherited wealth. One with a steeply graduated income tax.
    There should be centralized control of the banking, communication, and transport industries. He also mentioned free public education. Karl Marx actually did not believe in Utopia's He thought they were unrealistic. Oddly enough, what he wanted were utopian ideas.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Report Summary - Nietzsche's Ubermensch. Section 7.

    Background info: Friedrich Nietzsche was born of Prussian Nationality in October of 1884 and lived until the turn of the century, up to August of 1900. He was a phiologist before a philosopher, and when he was 24, achieved the position of Chair of Classical Philology at the University of Basel, the youngest to ever do so. He had an eventful but rough life. He taught, traveled, wrote, but he couldn't escape dealing with illnesses all his life. Unfortunately, after he died, his sister took control of his publications and writings, and contorted them to fit her anti-Semitic views.

    His first writing of the Ubermensch was in "Thus Spoke Zaruthustra," where he describes Ubermensch as a person who isn't limited by standard morals and is able to go exist beyond them, and in doing so, creates a new set of superior morals. It is a very selfish and narcissistic theory. His theory highlights humanity's
    "next step," essentially rising above good and evil. Again referencing his sister, popular theories suggest her editing of his works inspired the Nazi's ideals of superiority.

    Due to Mr. Nietzsche not specifically declaring the definition for Ubermench, popular definitions yield as such: A man who organized chaos within, a new "God," and a symbol of a man who created his own values. What the Ubermensch is not is a tyrant, for example. The Ubermensch is capable of being a tyrant, but through his perfection he is able to overcome and suppress that urge.

    Again, Ubermensch is a theory -- there has never been an Ubermensch. Although, some people will argue.

    https://philosophynow.org/issues/93/Nietzsches_Ubermensch_A_Hero_of_Our_Time Was an article that contained useful information if you want to go a bit more into detail regarding Nietzsche & his Ubermensch.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Sigmund Freud was born on May 6,1856 in Příbor, Czechia. He was the founding father on the theory of psychoanalysis. He believed that events in our childhood shaped our adult life behavior. Most of his works and studies were not deemed scientific because it was focused on the unconscious mind and not on measurable things. His most controversial works was pyschosexual development and the most known Oedipus complex.
    Freud described the unconscious as the things we are not aware of and will not be aware of. Such things that are hidden are: violent motives, irrationals wishes, inappropriate sexual desires etc. He used a popular iceberg model to describe the mind. The part that we see above the water is the concious. The part we see before we go under is the subconsious; we can choose to remember if we want. The unconscious is under the water, and shows our inner secret self.
    Another popular work is Dream Analysis. He thought that when we dream that is when the ego's defenses are lowered and so that is when the unconscious mind plays a part of our dreams. A dream typically has two parts: the manifest content and the latent content. The manifest is what you remember when you wake up and the latent is the hidden wish/meaning of the dream. Certain things that are in the dream are really symbols of things in a person's life. For example, small things like poles and dancing can secretly mean something sexual, and it depends on the person.

    All in all, even though his work was not considered scientific, it was considered new information, as psychology was relatively new at the time, and not much was known at the time about the mind. His work laid the foundation for psychologists who continues to study psychoanalysis.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Renee - Section 7

    John Rawls was an American philosopher whose work Theory of Justice discusses the way justice should be delivered with fairness. He was born on February 21, 1921 in Baltimore, MD and died November 21, 2002. He served as a professor at Princeton from 1950-1952, Cornell 1953-1953, MIT 1960-62 and Harvard 1963-91. He received his PhD in 1950 and taught at Cornell and MIT before coming to Harvard in 1962. He was named John Cowles Professor of Philosophy in 1975, and James Bryant Conant University Professor in 1979. He retired in 1991, but continued to teach regularly until 1994. John Rawls was arguably the most important political philosopher of the twentieth century. He believed a just system of distribution should be based on considerations of equality of rights and principles of fairness. He argued that "desert" is not a relevant consideration in distributive justice. Using a social contract to balance the interests of everyone to show that fairness is fundamental to justice​. To achieve this, everyone starts from the "Original Position" to create a principle of justice “under a veil of ignorance”. He believed that without knowing your social status, race, gender would come to the same conclusion after reading a social contract. That conclusion being that everyone would come to the same conclusion on justice.
    Rawls and MLK,Jr's philosophy on justice are very similar. Rawls did not focus attention to factors such as culture, race and gender which largely determine persons or a groups conception of the social good and fair distribution of goods​.
    Unlike King, Rawls and many other Westerners think of socio-political of self and community as polar opposites​.
    King suggested taking the best parts of communism such as individual liberty and the best parts of capitalism such as concern for the common good. MLK, Jr. described this as democratic socialism.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Midterm Project

    Alan Turing was born in 1912 in London, United Kingdom. He was a brilliant-minded mathematician and philosopher, but tended to be socially awkward and would generally avoid social situations. He was a skilled mathematician who attended and earned degrees from the University of Cambridge, Princeton University, and Kings College in Cambridge, United Kingdom. His skill in mathematics led Turing to a career in codebreaking. He went on to serve the United Kingdom and the Allied forces during World War II by cracking the Nazi submarine codes, which enabled the Allied forces to know what the Nazis were planning. This codebreaking breakthrough made Turing one of the most influential codebreakers of World War II.
    Not surprisingly, Turing’s mathematical thinking also made him an innovative thinker, which led him to becoming the father of modern computer science. Turing was fascinated with machines. He posed the philosophical question, can machines think? His question went beyond the meaning of computer programming and algorithms, but really think on their own. Helping invent the modern computer, in 1950, Turing began conducting tests on artificial intelligence. In his tests, there would be a human in one room communicating with the computer or person in another room. If the questioner could not tell whether he or she was interacting with a human or a computer would measure whether the machine was considered “intelligent.”
    Unfortunately, the Turing Test, as it came to be known, was published towards the end of his life. He was charged with gross indecency for being homosexual and required to be chemically castrated. Due to his criminal conviction, he lost his security clearance and was no longer allowed to code for the government. Sadly, Turing ended his own life in 1952. Despite his instrumental role in the Allied forces success against the Nazis and contributions to computer science, Turing was not recognized appropriately. In 2011, President Obama spoke to the Parliament in London. During his speech, President Obama recognized Turing and other scientist for their commitment to science and cutting-edge research. He went on to recognize these innovations, inventions and scientific data are still utilized today.
    There are currently 2 movies about him. The Imitation game and Code Breaker, there’s also a handful of books out about his life and his accomplishments.

    Christopher Hall Section 7

    ReplyDelete