“it is much safer to be feared than loved because ...love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every opportunity for their advantage; but fear preserves you by a dread of punishment which never fails." - an excerpt from The Prince
Niccolo Machiavelli- founder of Machiavellianism
Niccolo Machiavelli was born on May 3, 1469, in Florence, Italy. He was known for being an Italian Renaissance political philosopher and statement and secretary of the Florentine republic. He was the son of Bernado, a man who used to work in Florentine's highest offices before becoming one of the poorer families. Nevertheless, Bernado was able to access books for Niccolo's reading. Machiavelli was considered a bright young man that quickly rose to a high position. It is still a mystery how he was able to secure a position in the republic's foreign affairs in subject territories. He wrote several writings, one that is quite notable for its controversial contents: The Prince.
This book is really a political essay for a reigning figure ( a prince) to maintain his power/ control over a government state. This is where the book seems a bit dangerous. According to Machiavelli, he believes that a prince should not be subjected to rules; he can use whatever means necessary to maintain power albeit violence and/or war. He should use whatever force to maintain control over his state. Although, he should keep up his appearance; whether it means that he should appear as a kind or benevolent ruler or show himself as a cruel judge doling out extreme punishment as a way to instill fear in the people to dissuade revolts. He prefers to show the cruel side because as you can see in the quote above, he thinks that love is an obligation between people, not an actual bond, that can be broken when humans start thinking selfishly. He knows that fear can straighten people out because they don't want to receive an extreme punishment to happen to them. This is one of the main themes throughout his book, a prince should be "cold" towards his subjects, as this is the proper way to control a government state. After this book, his name was tainted with encouraging dictatorial leadership. The one thing that made his name synonymous with evil, anarchy, and cruelness was the famous Shakespeare's character: the “murtherous Machevil” Apparently, Machiavellianism is considered part of the Dark Triad in psychology, due to using others, with an evil intention, as a means to one's end. This is in line with narcissism and psychopathy, the other two in the triad.
Most people think of Machiavellianism as a totalitarian evil belief when it is another way to create and maintain a strong government; understanding the background of the view should dispel some of the evil reputations around its name. Although I don't 100% agree with Machiavelli, I can see some practicality in it. He wasn't too fond of being too kind to people, because then those people can prey on said kindness later, and I can understand that. However, I'm not going to go on the opposite extreme end and become a cold, closed-off person. I want to be a healthy balance of the two. There is some good to being Machiavellianistic. One needs to think about themselves a little selfishly instead of being a giver all the time; it's a dog-eat-dog world out there, and always thinking of others won't boost you ahead (although you'll have a good reputation!)
For more interesting information and a better summary, watch this video!
Works Cited
“A Quote from The Prince.” Goodreads.Com, www.goodreads.com/quotes/22338-it-is-much-safer-to-be-feared-than-loved-because. Accessed 3 May 2021.
“Niccolò Machiavelli - The Discourses on Livy.” Encyclopedia Britannica, www.britannica.com/biography/Niccolo-Machiavelli/The-Discourses-on-Livy. Accessed 3 May 2021.
Therapy, Harley. “What Is Machiavellianism in Psychology?” Harley TherapyTM Blog, 11 Oct. 2019, www.harleytherapy.co.uk/counselling/machiavellianism-psychology.htm#:%7E:text=Machiavellianism%20in%20psychology%20refers%20to,two%20being%20narcissism%20and%20psychopathy.
Tim. “Machiavelli Political Philosophy Summary.” Philosophy & Philosophers, 4 Apr. 2013, www.the-philosophy.com/machiavelli-political-philosophy-summary#:%7E:text=Because%20it%20is%20constantly%20under,to%20conduct%20a%20firm%20policy.
“What ‘Machiavellian’ Really Means - Pazit Cahlon and Alex Gendler.” YouTube, uploaded by TED-Ed, 25 Mar. 2019, www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUlGtrHCGzs.
Replied to Questions- Introduction- Jan 26
ReplyDeleteReplied to Questions - Jan 28
Replied to Questions- Feb 2
Replied to Questions -Feb 4
Replied to Questions - Feb 9
Replied to Questions - Feb 11
Replied to Questions - Feb 16
Replied to Questions - Feb 18
Replied to Questions - Feb 23
Replied to Questions - Feb 25
Replied to Questions - Mar 2
Replied to Questions - Mar 4
Replied to Questions - Mar 9
Replied to Questions - Mar 11
Replied to Questions - Mar 23
Replied to Questions - Mar 25
Replied to Questions - Mar 30
Replied to Questions - Apr 1
Replied to Questions - Apr 6
Replied to Questions - Apr 8
Replied to Questions - Apr 13
Replied to Questions - Apr 15
Replied to Questions - Apr 20
Replied to Questions - Apr 22
Replied to Questions - Apr 27
Answered to 25 question days
Presented my Midterm.
Delete"Although I don't 100% agree with Machiavelli, I can see some practicality in it." For whom? Surely not for the friends of democracy, and honesty, and transparency in government.
ReplyDelete"it's a dog-eat-dog world out there, and always thinking of others won't boost you ahead" -- Wow, that's pretty cynical (and not in Diogenes's sense)... and maybe even misanthropic. Is the point of life to "boost you ahead" of everybody else? Really? But you're right, so long as people THINK it's dog-eat-dog, that's what it will be.
I've never seen my dogs ingest another of their kind, btw. I'll bet you haven't either. Seriously: we can be better than that. Machiavelli lived in a cutthroat world, maybe he was realistic about that. But we can aim higher.
Anyway: did you know that today, May 3, is his birthday?
It’s the birthday of the man who wrote, “A prince never lacks legitimate reasons to break his promise”: Niccolò Machiavelli (books by this author), born in Florence (1469). He had an early career in politics when Italy wasn’t a unified country but rather a collection of allied city-states. It was an unstable time and he lost his post when the government was overthrown by the Medici family. He wrote The Prince in 1513 as an instruction manual on obtaining and holding onto power in hopes that he could impress the powerful Medicis and earn a political position. In his treatise, he wrote that morality was irrelevant when it came to running a state. He didn’t advocate evil for its own sake and believed rulers should stick to the good whenever possible. But he also said they should be willing to perform evil acts when it became necessary to hold onto their power and maintain the security of the state.
Machiavelli’s attempt to impress the Medicis backfired, and they may never have even read The Prince until after his death. His name became associated with cutthroat tactics and violence, and he never held another government job. https://www.garrisonkeillor.com/radio/twa-the-writers-almanac-for-may-3-2021/
I think it is practical for those who aren't too involved with their subjects and focus on the overall benefit of the state. I think the best leader is one who is both kind and strict, sort of a parental figure. I believe people are selfish in nature, and whenever it comes to choosing a good thing between a oneself and a friend, the person would most likely choose themselves. I'm not saying I'm above this; I think I would do the same. Life really isn't about trying to get ahead of others, but the world is constantly changing and evolving. People are trying to survive in the world; it's in their instincts to survive. To get the best education and jobs, it's a competitive market. Sometimes, thinking of others can be benefical, but then that would also be Machiavellianistic, because one may try to cash in that favor.
ReplyDelete