Sorry for briefly losing my equanimity this morning, section #5. The combination of Ronald Reagan's reprehensible endorsement of a bigoted theocrat's statement about his daughters being better dead than non-believers, AND a student's statement that he'd vote for Trump again, even as our democracy crumbles before our eyes, was too much. But I value stoic composure as a pedagogic ideal. I'll do better. jpo
(Successor site to CoPhilosophy, 2011-2020) A collaborative search for wisdom, at Middle Tennessee State University and beyond... "The pluralistic form takes for me a stronger hold on reality than any other philosophy I know of, being essentially a social philosophy, a philosophy of 'co'"-William James
As a student from section 5 I want to say something. We were made aware of your political beliefs at the beginning of the semester, however, a students opposing opinion shouldn't make you lash out. We live in a predominantly red state, it's unrealistic to expect your class to be one sided. I'm aware you said at the beginning of the semester to drop if we disagree with your views, but I think that goes against the point of the class and is unfair in general. I understand you disagree with Ronald Reagan's statement, as do I, but I also think you misunderstood what these students were saying. This is a discussion course we need to be able to have civil conversation. Have a blessed day.
ReplyDeleteLOL
DeleteThanks for the comment. As I say, mea culpa.
DeleteI never said anyone should drop if they disagreed with any of my expressed views. I would never say that. I would never require students to agree with all of my views. Believe me, I know this is a Red State.
I did say I would be sharing my perspective on issues of the day, and that philosophy as I conceive it requires an open and honest exchange of views. We've been experiencing that quite satisfactorily this semester, most of the time. My impassioned reaction Friday was an overreaction. I apologize.
Anonymous: it's not really a laughing matter to me.
Delete