Up@dawn 2.0 (blogger)

Delight Springs

Monday, April 21, 2025

William James Meets Rileytown

A report on "Freedom and Life" from Sick Souls, Healthy Minds: How William James Can Save Your Life by John Kaag. 

(Taniya Bryant - 006)
_

When I was first logged into ChoPhil and assigned myself to present a chapter report on Sick Souls, Healthy Minds by John Kaag, I didn’t expect much from my section “Freedom and Life.” Let me paint the picture, it was two days before I had to present that I started to read the chapter. At first, the words were all jumbling up together, morphing into a written blob of utter rubbish, but somehow, I persevered. And I’m glad I did because twelve pages later I had a revelation. Why did this Harvard professor who died in 1910 seem vaguely familiar, and that’s when it hit me…Disney Channel. Like any other child growing up in the early 2010s, I was an avid watcher of Disney Channel. There were lots of shows I was a fan of: Good Luck Charlie, Hannah Montana, Jessie.


But as I read further through the chapter, a singular show emerged from the darkest cave of my mind. Girl Meets World. Airing from 2014 to 2017, Girl Meets World was a spin-off of the 90s sitcom Boy Meets World that followed Cory and Topanga Matthews’ (two central characters from the original) journey of raising their teenage daughter, Riley, who is navigating her life with her friends.

Now, you may be asking, “Taniya, what does a book about a philosopher from the 19th century have to do with a random show you watched when you were a kid?” Everything! Because there is one character in that show who has a whole episode centered around them finding happiness and questioning themselves. A whole episode that is so uncanny to the portion read about in “Freedom and Life” that John Kaag should sue the Disney company for plagiarism. I am talking about season two, episode seventeen of Girl Meets World, titled “Girl Meets Rileytown”, that focuses on the shows very own main character, Riley Matthews.


(left: Riley Matthews, right: William James)

Like William James who lived in an era of optimism, Riley Matthews' whole mindset is to see the good in the world.  Think of the most happy-go-lucky person you know. Now, I want you to take that energy and multiply it ten times. That is Riley Matthews in a nutshell.  But what happens when that way of thinking starts to feel like a fabrication? John Kaag suggests that to overcome the perceived horror of existence, a "sick soul" needs a profound transformation, or a "twice born" experience to find the ability to at least tolerate the act of living.

In the episode “Girl Meets Rileytown” Riley starts to resent her optimistic way of life that she calls Rileytown. She describes it as goofy, silly, and weird. As a negative. William James also viewed himself in a negative life believing that he was too sick, too weak, and too unstable for anyone to want to be with him. But then came Alice Gibbens. No matter how many arguments he tried to make to Alice about how useless of a husband he would be, but Alice would be would not back down. Alice reminds me of Maya Hart, Riley’s best friend. No matter how many times Riley yelled at her, screamed at her, and hit her in the face with ice cream, Maya did not back down because she knew that this was not the Riley she knew.

John Kaag comments this phenomenon by saying, “Maybe we are so fixated our own obsessions and drawbacks
that we fail to notice our neighbors, friends, and potential loved ones.


In the Spring of 1870, William James wrote a diary entry about his experience after reading French thinker Charles Renouviers’ second essay. Renouvier wrote that an individual’s will could break the logical continuity of a mechanical series and be the initial causes of another series of phenomena (basically Newton’s First Law of Motion but philosophized). Upon reading James asserted, “My first act of freewill is to believe in free will.” 

Our own humiliation and expectations of ourselves cause us to forget just how in control we really are of ourselves. James was infatuated with Alice from the very beginning, and Riley was always proud to have that unique side of herself, yet they both denied themselves that freedom based on the notion that they didn’t deserve them. It was only when the two of them took a leap of faith that the two of them began to feel the stress of doubt peeling off. 

For William James it was embracing his vulnerability and marrying Alice.


(Alice Gibbens James with their son Henry James III)

For Riley it was standing up to her off-screen bullying (sidenote: even though it’s a kid show, I’ve always interpreted that “bully” as a kid-friendly way of showing Riley’s struggle with depression). 


Of course, the two of them would still occasionally have their ups and downs. Girl Meets World still had one more drama filled season left to air and William James has a whole book dedicated to his struggle of finding happiness throughout his year, but in the words of Cory Matthews, Riley’s father and history teacher, “Whatever it is that makes its way to you is just shadows of an intimidating word. Don’t live in the shadows.”

_

Questions
  1.  Do you agree with Williams James version of free will? Why or why not?
  2.  Going back to what Charles Renouvier wrote about in his essay, do you think that free will is more about the choices you make or how you respond to situations?
  3.  Of course William James lived in the 19th century and Riley Matthews is a fictional character, but what advice would you give to someone who wants to discover their freedom in the present day? Are there freedoms that we have that we might be unaware of?



1 comment:

  1. Nice job connecting WJ to present-day pop/youth culture. He'd be pleased (and so would Kaag), I'm sure.

    If you want to dig into WJ's relationship with Alice, check out their correspondence...

    Vol.1 https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/40307/pg40307-images.html
    Vol.2 https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/38091/pg38091-images.html

    People, even married people, used to write long thoughtful letters to one another. In some ways it's easier to grasp the interior lives of 19th century people than it will be for future historians and biographers who'll have nothing more reflective or sophisticated to go on than emails.

    ReplyDelete