Up@dawn 2.0 (blogger)

Delight Springs

Monday, March 3, 2025

Questions MAR 4

William James- #5 Grace A. #7 Emma S.

Nietzsche- #5 Will P. #6 Serenity F. #7 Daniel S.

FL 23-24 or HWT 25-26-

Something in QE Part III - Can we believe our eyes?- #5 Cameron W. #6 Amir S. #7 Maddison C.


Here's your audio review for Thursday's exam...


1. What's the point of James's squirrel story? Have you ever been involved in a "metaphysical dispute" of this sort? How was it resolved?

2. Who said truth is what we would end up with if we could run all the experiments and investigations we'd like to? (And what's a word his name rhymes with?) What does it imply about the present status of what we now consider true?

3. What did Bertrand Russell say about James's theory of truth? Was he being fair?

4. What 20th century philosopher carried on the pragmatist tradition? What did he say about the way words work? Does his approach seem reasonable to you?

5. What did Nietzsche mean by "God is dead"? (And what's a word his name rhymes with?) Does that statement seem nihilistic to you?

6. Where did Nietzsche think Christian values come from? What do you think about that?

7. What is an Ubermensch, and why does Nigel find it "a bit worrying"? Does it worry you that some of our peers think of themselves as exempt from the rules and norms that the rest of us follow?

8. How did Nietzsche differ from Kant but anticipate Freud? Is rationality less available to us than we think?

9. What were the three great revolutions in thought, according to Freud? Was he overrating his own contributions?

10. The "talking cure" gave birth to what? Have you had any direct experience with it, or any other form of "talking cure"?

11. Why did Freud think people believe in God? Was he right, about some people at least?

12. What was Karl Popper's criticism of Freudian psychoanalysis? Do you agree?

Weiner ch 11
  1. What is Weiner's favorite movie? What philosophical themes does it wrestle with? What Nietzschean idea does it resemble? How would you respond to the "demon" who proposes it?
  2. How do we write well, according to Nietzsche? Have you tried it? 
  3. What is amor fati? Do you have an "all or nothing" attitude towards life? What does that mean to you?
  4. What is the "as if" approach to life? Do you take it? Does it work?
  5. What is Sonya's opinion of Nietzsche and Eternal Recurrence? Do you share it?
  6. How does the "Hollywood version" of ER differ from Nietzsche's? Which do you prefer? Why?
HWT
1. What really distinguishes utilitarianism, for Baggini?

2. How did Mozi's maxim resemble J.S. Mill's principle of utility?

3. Each item of Jonathan Israel's key principles of Enlightenment concerns what?

4. Pluralism is often mistaken for what?


==

Ed Craig (a distinguished MTSU alum, class of '21) introduces the philosophy of William James

MY FIVE STEP PLAN FOR KNOWING WILLIAM JAMES by Ed Craig ("Grandfather Philosophy" on YouTube)

 

I never had heard of William James before I went back to college at age 74, and I think of myself as a fairly well-educated man. I knew his brother Henry, the author. I have discovered that I am not alone in not encountering James in my education. I have been educating myself in James over the past couple of years and have come to love him. I have found that James speaks to me, and that there are great lessons in how to live in his writings. It has been worthwhile for me to know him better, and I think it would be for others. For any interested, here is a 5-step plan to get to know (perhaps) America’s greatest philosopher. 

 

Step 1 Do a quick Google search. Read Wikipedia. 

It helps your introduction to William James to get some sense of who he was and his place as an American philosopher. James is not part of the philosophical canon and does not belong to any “school” of philosophy. English philosopher Alfred North Whitehead (1861 – 1947) claimed that the four great philosophical “assemblers” were Plato, Aristotle, Leibniz, and William James. Good company. James was a remarkable man. A quick read of his Wikipedia entry on his early life, career, and family gives a taste of who he was. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_James  

 

Step 2 Watch an address by James biographer Robert Richardson 

An address by James biographer Robert Richardson in August 2010 to the William James Symposium in Chocorua, New Hampshire, on the 100th anniversary of the death of James, provides helpful insight into the type of thinking that makes James so valuable in understanding how to live. (Chocorua was one of James’s homes, and the view of Mount Chocorua from his home, which “had 14 doors which all opened outwards,” is on the home page of Phil Oliver’s blog, Up@dawn 2.0 https://jposopher.blogspot.com/ 

 

Robert Richardson, Will You or Won’t You Have It So 

A second video from the conference contains the introduction of Robert Richardson and the Q&A discussion after the talk. Watch from @17:40. Note specifically James scholar John McDermott beginning at 19:40 when the discussion turned to James’s philosophical “school,” in which he says that James was not a part of any school, nor would he want to be, and that “in my experience there are persons who suddenly get introduced to James and things change, and that James becomes some kind of a presence in their lives.” (Richardson and Phil Oliver @26:04) 

Step 3 Read Jamesian scholar John McDermott’s introduction to The Writings of William James 

John McDermott edited an excellent collection of James’s work in The Writings of William James. In his introduction to this collection, McDermott presents James's thinking in all its manifestations, stressing the importance of radical empiricism and placing into perspective the doctrines of pragmatism and the will to believe. The critical periods of James's life are highlighted to illuminate the development of his philosophical and psychological thought. The Preface and Introduction are the best place to start your journey into James. 

Step 4 Read John Kaag’s Sick Souls and Healthy Minds: How William James Can Save Your Life. 

Before turning to James’s essays and his biography, read John Kaag’s popular book, Sick Souls and Healthy Minds: How William James Can Save Your Life. John Kaag is professor and Chair of Philosophy at the University of Massachusetts. In addition to Sick Souls, he is the author of American Philosophy: A Love Story (2016), and Hiking with Nietzsche: Becoming Who You Are (2018). It is a good story that shows how James can be a positive influence in your life. 


Step 5 Read biographies and essays 

Now begins the study of James. He was a prolific writer and popular public lecturer. The best way to begin a study of James is with a biography and selected essays in hand and read the essays as they appear in the biography.  

Biographies: 

Robert Richardson, William James: In the Maelstrom of American Modernism 

Perry, The Thought and Character of William James, two volumes (the gold standard for James biographies) 

 

Essays:  

Robert Richardson, The Heart of William James  

John McDermott, The Writings of William James 

William James: Writings – The Library of America, two volumes (Best collection for the serious) 

(essays can be found online at https://www.gutenberg.org/  

==

"Best book in the MTSU library" (more modestly, the best book by me in the library):


Audio review for Exam I, & WJ's advice

 Here's your audio review for next Thursday's exam...

And here's William James's advice for how best to prepare for an exam (after you've listened to the review and re-read the relevant texts):

"If you want really to do your best in an examination, fling away the book the day before, say to yourself, "I won't waste another minute on this miserable thing, and I don't care an iota whether I succeed or not." Say this sincerely, and feel it; and go out and play, or go to bed and sleep, and I am sure the results next day will encourage you to use the method permanently." -Talks to Students-The Gospel of Relaxation


This is how AI says he looked, btw:



"Nowruz" celebration March 15: free tix

On Saturday, March 15, from 5:00-9:00 PM in the Tennessee Ballroom, the Religious Studies Association will host a celebration of Nowruz, Persian/Kurdish/Afghan New Year’s Day, with Iranian classical music, art stations, and Middle Eastern food. In addition to RSA, the event is also cosponsored by our department, CLA, the Middle East Center, MT Engage, and the Office of International Affairs. 


You can sign up for free tickets via this link (also found on the flyer):

https://tinyurl.com/5y8vhmnm




Home invasion


https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/3/3/2306833/-Cartoon-Home-invasion

Phil.Oliver@mtsu.edu
👣Solvitur ambulando
💭Sapere aude

Truths to Remember in a Time of Lies

"…Truth matters. Rewriting American historywill not change American history. A law is still a law, even when a felon continues to flout the law. The truth is still the truth, even if you fire people working to combat your lies. Americans have always understood, if imperfectly at times, that truth matters. Even the Trump administration understands the power of truth. Why else would it be deleting data — on climate change, on police misconduct, on census numbers, on medical research and on gender, among others?

Republicans won't tell us the truth, and Democrats can't seem to rouse themselves into an organized effort to combat their lies. We must tell the truth ourselves. As unrelentingly as we can and in as many contexts as we can, we have no choice but to keep telling the truth until we have drowned out all the lies. Because the truth will always matter."


Margaret Renkl
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/03/opinion/trump-truth-lies.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Phil.Oliver@mtsu.edu
👣Solvitur ambulando
💭Sapere aude

Saturday, March 1, 2025

“mob hit”

Today, President Donald Trump ambushed Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky in an attack that seemed designed to give the White House an excuse for siding with Russia in its war on Ukraine. Vice President J.D. Vance joined Trump and Zelensky in the Oval Office—his attendance at such an event was unusual—in front of reporters. Those reporters included one from Russian state media, but no one from the Associated Press or Reuters, who were not granted access.

In front of the cameras, Trump and Vance engaged in what Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo called a "mob hit," spouting Russian propaganda and trying to bully Zelensky into accepting a ceasefire and signing over rights to Ukrainian rare-earth minerals without guarantees of security. Vance, especially, seemed determined to provoke a fight in front of the cameras, accusing Zelensky, who has been lavish in his thanks to the U.S. and lawmakers including Trump, of being ungrateful. When that didn't land, Vance said it was "disrespectful" of Zelensky to "try to litigate this in front of the American media," when it was the White House that set up the event in front of reporters.

Zelensky maintained his composure and did not rise to the bait, but he did not accept their pro-Russian version of the war. He insisted that it was in fact Russia that invaded Ukraine and is still bombing and killing on a daily basis. His refusal to sit silent and submit meekly to their attack seemed to infuriate them…
This afternoon, former representative Liz Cheney (R-WY) posted: "Generations of American patriots, from our revolution onward, have fought for the principles Zelenskyy is risking his life to defend. But today, Donald Trump and JD Vance attacked Zelenskyy and pressured him to surrender the freedom of his people to the KGB war criminal who invaded Ukraine. History will remember this day—when an American President and Vice President abandoned all we stand for."

HCR 
https://open.substack.com/pub/heathercoxrichardson/p/february-28-2025?r=35ogp&utm_medium=ios

Phil.Oliver@mtsu.edu
👣Solvitur ambulando
💭Sapere aude