(Successor site to CoPhilosophy, 2011-2020)
A collaborative search for wisdom, at Middle Tennessee State University and beyond... "The pluralistic form takes for me a stronger hold on reality than any other philosophy I know of, being essentially a social philosophy, a philosophy of 'co'"-William James
"Is life worth living? It depends on the liver" - William James
Jordan Reining (H1)
A brief overview
Suicide continues to be a constant concern across the United States. With these deaths comes the question of why. A common thought is mental illness, although there are a multitude of other factors including race, economic status, gender, and substance abuse. Many philosophers have shared their thoughts on the topic. Libertarians often hold the belief that we are the owners of our bodies, and therefore have the right to decide what we do with them. On the other hand, Christians are strictly against suicide, as it goes against God. Regardless of the morality of suicide, one question that many consider is if live is worth living.
The power of 'Maybe'
Philosopher William James (left) asked this question during a lecture at Harvard University. His famous essay on the subject talks about suicide and meaning in ones life. He explains that many people easily answer the question with optimism, however, he objects, stating that optimism is often temporary. If optimism and happiness were permanent, James explains, then there would be no need to ask such questions.
Throughout his life, James struggled with suicidal thoughts. Overwhelmed with the loss of his son, he got through it by focusing on philosophy. By pondering and answering philosophical questions, he was able to gain control of his life and continue on. At the end of his speech, he encourages the audience to "Believe that life is worth living, and your belief will help create the fact."
It is clear that James does not have a set answer as to whether life is worth living. Based on his experience, it all depends upon 'maybe'. If you believe and have faith that life is worth all of the struggle, then it will likely become true, even if it is only true for you. On the other hand. if you do not look past the hardships and evil that life brings, life will slowly stop appealing to you.
In order for this idea to work, one must have a little faith and desire. With no effort put in, one's life will remain the same- good or bad. Putting an idea into place and getting the ball rolling so to speak, is what counts.
Living foryourself and others
Like William James and countless others, I have been close to those that often teeter on the edge of life and death. A weighted decision that cannot be undone waits in the air for a reason to stay or go. At the thought of a life worth living, a few questions come to mind. When on the edge, most think about ending a pain that will not give up. The effects and feelings of others is not brought to mind in such times of crisis. While James focuses on a 'maybe', I will be focusing on the pleasure of life and the expense of others.
Life's pleasures
Epicurus (right)comes to mind when thinking of a good life. Old Epicureanism focused on the simplicity of life. Life could be full of pleasure while keeping things minimum- lavish parties were traded in for time with friends.
This video is a good reminder of Epicurus and his philosophies if you've forgotten.
As mentioned in the above video, Epicurus believed three things were necessary for a good and fulfilling life.
Friends. He realized that time with friends was important in keeping people happy.
Focusing on meaningful work. Epicurus believed that smaller settings were beneficial. Being involved and benefiting the world while enjoying your work was necessary.
Epicurus had recognized that having a clear head would lead to happiness. Limiting anxieties would only help in the long run.
Epicurus focused on these three things to achieve a life worth living. Pleasure is the base of all the reasons listed, and most commonly the first thing people think when they hear of Epicureanism. With Epicurus as a guide, it is possible to say pleasure is what makes life worth living. The beauty of life around us is as good a reason as any to continue on and believe in life, as James would say.
The expense of others
Suicide usually results in harm done to those around it. Some affect a community while others affect a small group. These groups are filled with people often called suicide 'survivors'. One of the warning signs of suicide is knowing someone that has attempted and succeeded.
Many arguments against suicide take root in its harm to communities. In spaces with younger people, suicide can lead to suicide clusters. The actions of one show others that life is in your hands, and the control is yours, however, not every suicide will influence or be the cause of another.
Is one life's end of suffering enough to justify what may be the beginning of pain for those connected to that life? This question strikes a similarity to the ethical question of one life versus ten lives. All choices will be against one side, benefiting the other. There is no clear answer, and this question is one discussed by those focused on the community aspect of suicide.
Is life worth living in order to spare the pain of others? According to James, life might be worth living, depending on what you believe. Going through the motions just to spare others may not change much, if you do not put faith in it.
There is not a concrete answer to the question of if life is worth living. For some, the answer is as easy as breathing. For others, a struggle presents itself at the beginning of each day to continue. Life is full of both pleasure and pain, regardless of how you live. In the end, it comes down to maybe.
For my final blogpost, I will be expanding upon my ideas about Epicureanism. Specifically, I’m going to discuss whether or not traditional Epicureanism is the key to happiness in modern society. Traditional Epicureanism refers to the concept happiness should be the ultimate life goal and that it can be achieved by living a modest lifestyle in order to limit superficial desires. Is this realistic today? Is it achievable? Would an Epicurean lifestyle be fulfilling for the average person in the 21st century?
Epicureanism would’ve been a decently easy lifestyle to follow as late as 200 years ago. In a world with no advanced technology, internet, or modern problems, temptation would’ve been more minimal. Life was incredibly simple despite not having technology that supposedly makes our lives easier. Religion was also more prevalent and emphasized during this time period. Christian scripture encourages followers to live without fear and put trust into God, so atraxia and aponia may have been easier to reach during this time period. Those ideas were emphasized and made societal values because religion was a significant part of everyone’s lives. They may have been more likely to experience more frequent static pleasure as well because of this. Religion provides a sense of general satisfaction and fulfillment, which is a brief description of static pleasure. Although I’m grateful for the opportunities and freedom we have today, it must’ve been comforting to know that planning a life was significantly easier because there was only so many paths laid out for you to choose from. For example, if you came from a family of farmers, you were expected to follow in their footsteps and work for the family business.I feel that always having a general idea of what your future looks like would provide a sense of satisfaction and gratitude. Because religion was so emphasized, family and community naturally were extremely important as well. Epicureans also believe that a key to happiness is spending time with loved ones and doing acts of civility. People in less modern eras were more likely to gain happiness from this because helping others was taught from a young age and was considered a societal standard.Someone in this point in time would likely be fulfilled by an Epicurean lifestyle because the primary arguments of Epicureanism were already ingrained into their morals and day-to-day lives.
However, the society we live in today is considerably more complex. In simple terms, we are able to pursue anything we please at any time we choose. Our society provides with endless options for careers, education, pleasure, and spending. There are more and more ways to indulge in unnecessary pleasures as time passes. The internet and modern technological advancements have significantly contributed to this as well. At every turn, we are constantly being bombarded with personally selected advertisements of products, websites, movies, and other distractions that pull us away from reality and isolate us from the people in our lives. Aimlessly spending money has now also become a trend. There are thousands of easily accessible online stores to browse, tens of thousands of shopping malls to walk through, and a strong desire to make needless purchases to “keep up” with those around us. This directly contridicts Epicurean teachings, which tell us to live modestly.Atraxia is also harder to reach to due to our increased freedom and access to the internet. With countless options on how to live our lives, we spend hours at a time battling with indecision, worry, and fear that we may be unable to achieve our dreams, or that we have made a regrettable lifestyle choice. More of anything is bound to create more problems. The media has also made it exponentially easier to access information of all kinds. Our societal issues are being non-stop broadcasted to consumers. While this can be beneficial, some content creators can also misuse this power to incite fear in others. Because this information is so accessible, it is almost impossible to avoid fearmongering media content. Media aside, many of our current societal issues regard the threats against minorities. It is difficult to avoid in conversation and day-to-day situations, and many people likely experience a lingering sense of fear for their safety and well-being. Epicurean values are more difficult to follow today because our society is technologically complex, socially divided, and isolating. People would rather indulge in trendy clothes, unnecessary vacations, and solitary screen time then moderate their spending and spend time with those around them. Our societal values no longer align as strongly with Epicureanism as they previously did.
While Epicureanism in a modern world sounds refreshing, it is explicably harder to achieve as we continue to evolve into a world that seems to value technology and material items above all. Sadly, our values don’t align with its primary arguments as much as they used to.To achieve happiness today, I believe a balance between moderation and indulgence is key. We have to continue making connections with others and doing civil acts, but there is nothing wrong with treating ourselves to something new and exciting on occasion.
Here are a few articles about Epicureanism that I found particularly interesting: