Up@dawn 2.0 (blogger)

Delight Springs

Thursday, April 28, 2022

Bertrand Russell's Why I Am Not a Christian 1927

     Why I Am Not a Christian was a lecture given on March 6, 1927 at Battersea Town Hall for the National Secular Society's South London Branch. But first let us talk about the man behind the essay cum lecture known as a British philosopher and logician Bertrand Russell.

Battersea Town Hall

   Bertrand Russell


    Bertrand Russell lived for almost a hundred years from 1872-1970. Russell studied at Cambridge University for Mathematics and Philosophy. Along with G.E. Moore he was a founder of Analytic Philosophy and his most notable student Ludwig Wittgenstein. He's a major pacifist who opposed fighting in both World Wars and even went to prison for it in World War I. During World War II he changed his views about fighting and deemed defeating Hitler as a necessary evil. Bertrand Russell's most renowned works include The Principles of Mathematics, Principia Mathematica, The Analysis of Mind, The Analysis of Matter, Power: A New Social Analysis, and of course Why I Am Not a Christian. For his various works he received the Nobel Prize of Literature in 1950.

Why I Am Not a Christian

    This essay is an argument Bertrand Russell made against theism and why he does not believe in God or immortality. 
    His dispute against the First Cause Argument is that it holds no validity. His father taught him the question "Who made me?" has no answer, due to there being a follow up question of "Who made god?" Russell believes that if everything were to have a cause then so must god. He concludes that there doesn't need to be a cause or reason for anything to exist. 
    When it comes to the natural law argument, which states a higher being, whether it be god or otherwise created laws that the universe is beholden to. He asks why only these natural laws were made and why there were no others. Russell find that these natural laws are actually statistical averages that came from chance.
    Regarding the argument from design Bertrand is convinced that the environment was not made to suit living beings. On the contrary, because of Charles Darwin we found that creatures evolved to suit the place they live in. 
    When it comes to Christianity, Bertrand Russell does not believe in everlasting punishment and this vies against the belief in hell. He finds that hell is an extremely cruel doctrine that gave the world ages of cruel torture. Especially so when hellfire awaits people just for not believing in Christ. Does this conclude that all people are born wicked unless we were to hold to the Christian belief? When it comes down to who is truly wicked it is more often than not that they are zealots, be it a zealot of faith or country does not matter. 
    Bertrand Russell finalizes his speech by asserting a moral system not based on religious texts, but wisdom, courage and care. He wants us to look forwards to the future in hope while not being held back by what he calls a "past that is dead". 

The speaker in this video is not Bertrand Russell

    Bertrand Russell's Why I Am Not a Christian has sparked a whole slew of other works from different authors with similar titles like Why I Am Not a Muslim. In my eyes it wasn't just Christianity he was against, but all other religions. He specifically picked out Christianity, because of his background of being raised by his grandmother who was a devout Christian. Russell does not say he is a hundred percent certain that there exists no god, but that there is no evidence that he can see that supports it. Just like with his analogy about there being a teapot between Earth and Mars even if you cannot see it, it doesn't mean it does not exist. Below is a video that can better describe Russell's Teapot.


Sources:


1 comment:

  1. "...it wasn't just Christianity he was against, but all other religions." More broadly he was opposed to supernaturalism and superstition not grounded in rationality and evidence. He continues the tradition of David Hume, insisting that it's wisdom to proportion ones belief to the evidence... and to withhold belief when that is lacking. It is true, though, that he was contemptuous of religions that inspire fear with stories, for example, of eternal damnation.

    ReplyDelete