(Successor site to CoPhilosophy, 2011-2020) A collaborative search for wisdom, at Middle Tennessee State University and beyond... "The pluralistic form takes for me a stronger hold on reality than any other philosophy I know of, being essentially a social philosophy, a philosophy of 'co'"-William James
Monday, June 26, 2023
Thursday, June 22, 2023
Saturday, June 17, 2023
Can you choose to act as if you have free will…
https://www.instagram.com/p/CtlqzP5MxEA/?igshid=NzJjY2FjNWJiZg==
Monday, May 29, 2023
Succession’s iffy American grip
The show captured the terrifying, mesmerizing interplay between fact and fiction — and turned it into great television.
"...the blurring of reality and fantasy isn't merely fascinating. Americans' knack and weakness for these mixtures amount to a founding national predisposition — what made America the global center of show business, from P.T. Barnum to Hollywood to televangelism to reality TV. Our wise forebears also built walls between important reality over here and entertainment and make-believe over there and installed useful establishment gatekeepers to decide what belonged where.
During the past half-century, those barriers crumbled gradually, then suddenly. America's iffy grip on reality turned from a chronic condition to acute and pathological, metastasizing beyond entertainment and spreading throughout the real world, most disastrously into our information and political systems, a phenomenon for which no single individual and enterprise has been more responsible than the real-life inspirations for Logan Roy and ATN. Early this season, Logan told his children, "I love you, but you are not serious people." He could have been talking to America, where people now feel entitled to their own facts as well as their own opinions..." Kurt Andersen
Thursday, May 25, 2023
What College Students Need
...Dr. Peña-Guzmán dismissed the idea that a course like his is only suitable for students who don’t have to worry about holding down jobs or paying off student debt. “I’m worried by this assumption that certain experiences that are important for the development of personality, for a certain kind of humanistic and spiritual growth, should be reserved for the elite — especially when we know those experiences are also sources of cultural capital,” he said. Courses like The Reading Experiment are practical too, he added: “I can’t imagine a field that wouldn’t require some version of the skill of focused attention.”
The point is not to reject new technology but to help students retain the upper hand in their relationship with it. Ms. Rodriguez, the economics major who took Living Deliberately and Existential Despair, said that before those classes she “didn’t distinguish technology from education; I didn’t think education ever went without technology. I think that’s really weird now. You don’t need to adapt every piece of technology to be able to learn better or more,” she said. “It can form this dependency.”
The point of college is to help students become independent humans who can choose the gods they serve and the rules they follow, rather than allowing someone else to choose for them. The first step is dethroning the small silicon idol in their pocket — and making space for the uncomfortable silence and questions that follow. The experience stuck with Ms. Ouyang, the nursing major: “I didn’t look forward to getting my phone back,” she said.
Monday, May 15, 2023
Against Despair: An Open Letter to Graduates
My generation has wrecked so much that is precious. How could I dare to offer you advice?
...You are children of the 21st century, and yours is the first generation to recognize the inescapable urgency of climate change, the first not to deny the undeniable loss of biodiversity. You have grown up in an age permeated by the noise of a 24-hour news cycle, by needless political polarization, by devastating gun violence, by the isolating effects of “social” media. You have seen hard-won civil rights rolled back. You have come of age at a time of existential threat — to the planet, to democracy, to the arc of the moral universe itself — and none of it is your fault.
I wouldn’t blame you if you’re wondering how somebody of my generation, which wrecked so much that is precious, could dare to offer you advice. My only response is that age has exactly one advantage over the energy and brilliance of youth: Age teaches a person how to survive despair...
Margaret Renkl https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/15/opinion/letter-to-graduates-hope-despair.html?smid=em-share
Friday, May 12, 2023
Q & A
Thursday, May 11, 2023
Degraded personhood
"The Turing test cuts both ways. You can’t tell if a machine has gotten smarter or if you’ve just lowered your own standards of intelligence to such a degree that the machine seems smart. If you can have a conversation with a simulated person presented by an AI program, can you tell how far you’ve let your sense of personhood degrade in order to make the illusion work for you?"
Jaron Lanier, You Are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto [2010]
https://a.co/6Rs2n1i
Wednesday, May 10, 2023
Natality
https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/natality-mortality-banks-arendt-children-india-feminism
Tuesday, May 9, 2023
Why Conscious AI Is a Bad, Bad Idea
Something to consider in MALA's tag-team course on Knowledge, next semester.
Our minds haven’t evolved to deal with machines we believe have consciousness.
"...Future language models won’t be so easy to catch out. Before long, they may give us the seamless and impenetrable impression of understanding and knowing things, regardless of whether they do. As this happens, we may also become unable to avoid attributing consciousness to them too, suckered in by our anthropomorphic bias and our inbuilt inclination to associate intelligence with awareness..." Anil Seth
https://nautil.us/why-conscious-ai-is-a-bad-bad-idea-302937/
Monday, May 8, 2023
George Berkeley’s Name Removed from Trinity College Dublin Library
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/08/world/europe/george-berkeley-trinity-college-dublin.html
Wednesday, May 3, 2023
Presentations conclude Thursday May 4, 10 a.m. via Zoom
Thanks to all for participating.
Grades should be posted by the registrar early next week.
Have a good summer.
jpo
Final report blog post
- OPEN YOUR EMAIL AUTHOR INVITATION, then look for the NEW POST tab in the upper right on our blogsite (do NOT create a new blog, post your final report on our site)
- If you want feedback on an early draft, PUBLISH it (and label it as a draft, until you post the final version)
- If you are not yet an author as of May 1, send your post to me: phil.oliver@mtsu.edu
- The topic should complement, clarify, and elaborate on some central aspect of your final presentation. Share and defend your own view(s), if you have any. Address one or more of your discussion questions.
- Aim for a minimum of 1,000 words.
- Include relevant links (at least half a dozen or so), embeds (a couple), and graphics (one or two): how to do it...
- When referencing texts we've read in the course, cite page #s and abbreviations (LHP=Little History of Philosophy, LH=Life is Hard, SSHM-Sick Souls Healthy Minds, WGU=Why Grow Up, F=Fantasyland).
- Make sure your post has formatted correctly. If not, use the Clear formatting command in the toolbar in the upper right, above, to fix it.
- The final draft is due May 2.
Tuesday, May 2, 2023
Religious Influence in Politics
Sick Souls, Healthy minds by John Kaag
William James's Moral Equivalent to War is Incorrect
https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/James/James_1911_11.html Text in PDF form.
William James was an American philosopher and psychologist who lived between 1842 and 1910. Originally in a lecture given at Stanford in 1906, James proposed a "moral equivalent to war.
The main idea of James’s proposal is that human beings have a for conflict, which according to James, has traditionally been met by war which provides a sense of purpose, meaning, and excitement that is difficult to find in normal everyday life. James, however, was a pacifist, and believed that war was abhorrent, and thus sets out to find an alternative way to satisfy these needs. James would ultimately propose what he called a "moral equivalent" to war, something that would provide the same sense of struggle and purpose that was provided by war without the violence and destruction brought upon by it. James believed that this moral equivalent could be achieved through shifting mankind's aggression towards nature. More specifically towards injustices that exist in nature.
The way he sees his idea being achieved is by nations conscribing youth to a so-called army to combat nature. "To coal and iron mines, to freight trains, to fishing fleets in December, to dishwashing, clothes washing, and window washing, to roadbuilding and tunnel-making, and to the frames of skyscrapers, would our gilded youths be drafted off to get the childishness knocked out of them, and to come back into society with healthier sympathies and soberer ideas. They would have paid their blood-tax, done their own part in the immemorial human warfare against nature; they would tread the earth more proudly, the women would value them more highly, they would be better fathers and teachers of the following generation." he writes in the essay.
This, however, is flawed, in my opinion. What William James proposes is both partly irresponsible and unfulfilling. It is first of all irresponsible to call for a war on nature. Calling it a war on nature is open ended enough that it can be up for interpretation. A war on nature can be seen as simple subduing nature’s more dangerous aspects, like the elimination of certain diseases. However, it can also be seen as a call for the destruction of nature. Mankind is hardwired for destruction, and calling it a war can, and ultimately would lead to, in my opinion, a person or a group of people destroying nature as we know it, all in the name of satisfying mankind’s needs.
William James’s idea of a moral equivalent is unfulfilling. Who is to say that people of higher social status would not use that status to get out of their duty, similar to Civil War draft dodgers. Along with that, war is romanticized in ways most other activities are not. It is seen as brave for one to selflessly fight for ones nation. This goes for those who do and do not fight in it. When World War One broke out, many young men lined up to join the army in the United Kingdom. During the war, those who could not, or chose not to fight were harassed. It hard to see this same fervor fallowing a war on nature.
Love and free will
As I went over in class, the author of Sick Souls Healthy Minds talked about this thing called a second wind. The second wind gives you a reason or something worth living for. For many people who suffer from depression or self-image issues, there can come a time when everything around you seems helpless, and they may try and take their life. For some people who come out of that place, this creates a force that propels people forward in life and gives them a second wind (SSHM pg.46). I had a time in my life when I felt helpless, struggling to find something worth having time for. I struggled to have passionate relationships and find something worth living for. I was desperate, and it seemed like the helpless pit was getting deeper and deeper. I didn't feel like anything was going well for me and I started thinking it would be better if I weren't here. Then during my sophomore year of college, I found out what was worth living for, my second wind: living a life serving God and loving other people.
Are religious people happier, healthier?
In the same way, William James decided to believe in free will (SSHM pg. 49), and I also started to think that I had control over my life and had the option to be free from faults. It just was in a very counter-culturally way. It required that I submit myself to God; we often in this society think that submitting ourselves and humbling ourselves is terrible, but it is essential in God's eyes. I was given hope, something to live for, and faith in something greater than myself. Faith in someone who will never let me down, someone who already gave their life for me when I was unworthy. Someone who designed me personally when I was in my mother's womb, who has been watching and waiting for a time I needed him. As the author's example of falling in love and free will are the same, I also think that using your free will to submit to God will have the same radical effects on your life. His plan will alter your life, and since it's a personal relationship with him, it's forever growing, and it's all a unique experience. Having confidence in the teachings of Jesus Christ leads you into a life worth living because it's no longer for yourself but for your neighbors, friends, family, and the King of all Kings.
Free will? Why is it important?
There were two things that Jesus asked all of humankind to do after he left. That was to love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind. We know we have come to love the Lod when we keep his commandments. We all have sinned, fallen short of God's glory, and don't deserve his love. But after all of that, the best part is that God demonstrated his love for us because while we were still sinners, he sent his son to die for us on the cross. He paid the debt of sin in full so that we may live according to the commandments, and if we do sin, we have an advocate who can say, "Your sins are forgiven." The second thing Jesus asked us to do is to love our neighbor as ourselves. I find no greater joy than unselfishly seeking the best for other people in my life. True love means you give everything you can to people without expecting anything in return. So, when the author talks about William James and how his falling in love with his wife changed his life, and how he took a leap of faith into something, it sounds a lot like biblical love.
William James was affected by his father telling him that there is no free will in life which is not valid. This cause James to be very depressed and hopeless as it seems like you have no power over his life. That is not true; we do have free will to either live our life according to r own selfish desires or to submit ourselves to God and serve his kingdom. I lived my life for 20 years thinking that everything would happen for a reason, that my decisions were the best, and that I knew the best ways to do things. Then when I finally put my life in God's hands and allowed him to be the center of my life, he changed me for the better. I had to choose to submit myself, though, and I had to mean it. That meant giving up many things that I liked, but they were not healthy for me. I just convinced myself that it was ok. My decisions led me into hardship because I didn't want to humble myself before the lord. None of my hardships came from God, but they all allowed his glory to shine because I am such a different person from who I used to be. Even if I do suffer or face troubles, it's never going to be able to pull me away from God's love.
If God Is in Control, Why Do Bad Things Happen to Us?
I think love is a strong enough emotion to give us something to live for. I believe godly love brings peace and something worth living for. Love is more potent than anything I can think of. It makes me do some crazy things. God loves us so much and doesn't want us to suffer. He is slow to anger and is patient with us, allowing us to walk freely and even curse him, yet when we call on him, he answers lovingly without hesitation. When we do make God upset with us, he doesn't look at us in our shame. He looks at the Lamb of God, the holy sacrifice, and thinks that was enough. He is more significant than our sins. That all comes from the fact that he loves us. Free will and love do go hand in hand. It is different from what the world will tell you because it's not love from the world. It's love from a higher power.
The Biggest Question Why ?
Alone but not lonely
While doing some reading about loneliness I found this article from the NYT about parallel play. Its a term generally associated with young children who can play independently alongside one another. One example of this in my daily life is when I play video games. I may be immersed into my game but knowing that my partner is on the bed reading a book silently is more than enough company and fills my social needs. I don't find myself often craving social interaction. My friends and previous roommates have referred to me as having "cat energy". I hang out in the general vicinity but will keep to myself until I want attention. But also like a cat too much attention and I am likely to scratch. Metaphorically at least. Lastly I will link to a recent episode of a podcast I enjoy called The psychology of your 20s with Jemma Sbeg.
84. Loneliness is not your enemy!
Social isolation and loneliness outreach toolkit from NIH