Up@dawn 2.0 (blogger)

Delight Springs

Monday, February 19, 2024

Questions FEB 20

The exam is a week from Thursday. Here's your Audio review, Part 1. Part 2 coming soon. Meanwhile, the best way to prepare is by revisiting the relevant texts pertaining to the daily questions. If someone would care to earn a bonus base AND provide a helpful service, you could copy and paste all the questions since the semester began into a new post (you'll need to become an Author on the site to do that, let me know if you want to volunteer and I'll send you an Author invitation). 

LHP

1. Spinoza's view, that God and nature (or the universe) are the same thing, is called _______. What do you think of that view?

2. If god is _____, there cannot be anything that is not god; if _____, god is indifferent to human beings. Is that how you think about god?

3. Spinoza was a determinist, holding that _____ is an illusion. Do you think it is possible (and consistent) to choose to be a determinist?

4. According to John Locke, all our knowledge comes from _____; hence, the mind of a newborn is a ______.  If Locke's right, what do you think accounts for our ability to learn from our experiences?


5. Locke said _____ continuity establishes personal identity (bodily, psychological); Thomas Reid said identity relies on ______ memories, not total recall. How do you think you know that you're the same person now that you were at age 3 (for example)? If you forget much of your earlier life in old age, what reassures you that you'll still be you?

6. Locke's articulation of what natural rights influenced the U.S. Constitution? Do you think it matters if we say such rights are discovered rather than invented?

HWT
1. What are atman and anatta, and what classical western idea do they both contradict?

2. What was John Locke's concept of self or soul? What makes you you?

3. Shunning rigid essentialized identities, younger people increasingly believe what?

4. What cultural stereotype did Baggini find inaccurate when he went to Japan?

5. What important distinction did Nishida Kitaro draw?

6. What point about individuality did Monty Python make?

7. What is ubuntu?

FL
1. Who wrote a memoir of life on the Kentucky frontier that turned him into a "real-life superhero"? (He's in my family tree, btw.)

2. Who built a cabin by a lake, moved in on the 4th of July, and epitomized a perennial American pastoral fantasy? What do you think he'd say about modern suburbia?

3. What did The New York Sun announce in a week-long "news" story in 1835? Who believed it?

4. Who was P.T. Barnum, and what was his fundamental Fantasyland mindset?

5. Whose touring play marked what key milestone in America's national evolution?

6. Who was Aunt Jemima?

 Irvin Yalom's novel The Spinoza Problem suggests that Epicurus's view of the gods as real but distant was "bold, but not foolhardy"... and that it presaged Spinoza's pantheism. 

 


"I believe in Spinoza's God..." --Albert Einstein, as reported in the New York Times April 1929...

Spinoza the pantheist: "he believed that he believed"...

"Perhaps the most famous self-proclaimed disciple of Spinoza in the twentieth century was Einstein, who, when asked by a rabbi whether or not he believed in God, replied, "I believe in Spinoza's God, who reveals himself in the harmony of all being, not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and actions of men." Einstein was probably just being diplomatic when he answered the rabbi. Spinoza's God is, after all, a convenient deity for those who might more accurately be described as non-religious. The "religion" of Spinozism is in fact rather close to modern secularism. It insists that morality has nothing to do with the commands of a supremely powerful being, and that it does not require a priesthood or the threat of an unpleasant afterlife to sustain it. It rejects the idea of a personal God who created, cares about and occasionally even tinkers with the world. It dismisses the notion of the supernatural, and regards religious ceremonies as merely comforting or inspiring, if you like that sort of thing. It advocates freedom of thought in religious matters... And it places its faith in knowledge and understanding—rather than in faith itself—both to improve the circumstances of human life and to make that life more satisfying. The poet Heine, writing in the 1830s, seems to have glimpsed how far ahead of his times Spinoza was in this respect: "There is in Spinoza's writings a certain inexplicable atmosphere, as though one could feel a breeze of the future. Perhaps the spirit of the Hebrew prophets still rested on their late descendant." What would this "God-intoxicated" man have made of his own intellectual descendants? They include many people who openly profess atheism, and even though atheism now carries no stigma in economically developed countries except the United States, it is hard to imagine Spinoza being altogether happy to embrace it. What were for him the most important qualities among those traditionally attributed to God are, in his philosophy, qualities of the universe itself. God is not fictitious; He is all around us. Spinoza's God is admittedly so different from anyone else's that a case can be made for saying that he was an atheist without realising it; but it does appear that he believed that he believed in God. It is sometimes said that the birth of Judaism constituted an intellectual advance over most earlier religions because it reduced a panoply of gods to the one God of monotheism. On this way of thinking, Spinoza may be considered to have continued the work of his distant Hebrew ancestors by performing a further subtraction of the same sort, and reducing the duo of God and world to one."

— The Dream of Enlightenment: The Rise of Modern Philosophy by Anthony Gottlieb

29 comments:

  1. 3. Spinoza was a determinist, holding that _____ is an illusion. Do you think it is possible (and consistent) to choose to be a determinist
    He thought free will is an illusion, meaning that everything a person does is caused by a previous action. In this belief system, it seems impossible to actually choose to be a determinist– even that choice must be caused by some previous experience.

    Locke said _____ continuity establishes personal identity (bodily, psychological); Thomas Reid said identity relies on ______ memories, not total recall. How do you think you know that you're the same person now that you were at age 3 (for example)? If you forget much of your earlier life in old age, what reassures you that you'll still be you?
    Locke thought psychological continuity establishes identity, meaning a person in the same body could be a completely different “person” 20 years apart. Reid said identity relies on overlapping memories. I don’t think of myself now as the same person as when I was three, at least not fully. Likewise, if I forgot much of my life in old age, I wouldn’t be the same person as I am now. I wouldn’t likely be a completely different person, but I certainly wouldn’t be me.


    6. Locke's articulation of what natural rights influenced the U.S. Constitution? Do you think it matters if we say such rights are discovered rather than invented?
    Locke’s articulation of the natural rights of life, liberty, and property influenced the constitution. It does matter to say the rights were discovered, not invented. Invention implies that the rights are given as a privilege, which would mean they aren’t really “natural” at all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hannah Ferreira H01
    4. According to John Locke, all our knowledge comes from _____; hence, the mind of a newborn is a ______. If Locke's right, what do you think accounts for our ability to learn from our experiences?

    Experience; blank slate, tabula rasa. I think our ability to learn from our experiences comes from the consequences of our actions.

    3. Spinoza was a determinist, holding that _____ is an illusion. Do you think it is possible (and consistent) to choose to be a determinist?

    Determinism holds that free will is an illusion. Unless you believed in a good and holy God who has complete total sovereignty over you and all of your actions, and were simply surrendering to this fact, I don’t think it would be possible and consistent to choose to be a determinist. It simply wouldn’t be philosophically consistent.

    6. Locke's articulation of what natural rights influenced the U.S. Constitution? Do you think it matters if we say such rights are discovered rather than invented?

    His articulation of life, liberty, and property influenced the Constitution. I think it does matter. Discovered implies that the rights are immovable and inherent and must be protected. Invented implies that they are contrived and not based in truth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really like your answer to question 4. In my personal life, the best way I have learned and figured out how to fix mistakes is by making mistakes. It's like when you tell a child that a surface is hot, but they touch it anyway. They learn from that moment on that the surface will be hot and that they should be careful.

      Delete
    2. Shelby Baltimore H03February 20, 2024 at 2:06 PM

      yes!! the best way for us to learn is through making mistakes, fixing them, and learning from it!! the greatest success stories didn't begin with an easy walk to the top. It was more like a strenuous climb through untamed trails lol. think about the start of google, apple, even the earliest philosophers didn't have success right off the bat (see Socrates and his ending). these are both great perspectives (for number 4)!!!

      Delete
  3. Keira HO2- FL 2. Henry David Thoreau built a cabin off the lake Walden and proceeded to write about showed him how to "truly live". Yet he returned to suburban living. Although he would likely have very critical views on modern suburbia, he did fall victim to the ease and consistency of suburbia.
    LHP 4. Experience; tabula rasa i.e. blank slate. If he is correct, then our ability to learn s based off of our perception and reactions.
    HWT 7. Ubuntu is considered a philosophy about interconnectedness and community. Originating from south Africa it states "I am because we are" going back to the idea that we are only as prosperous as our community and influences interaction and community-based decision making.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Again, don't bother answering questions others have already answered accurately. But DO share your thoughts and comments about the issues raised in those questions. And try to post before class day.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Will Slaughter- h02
    Spinoza's view, that God and nature (or the universe) are the same thing, is called _______. What do you think of that view?
    - Spinoza was a pantheist, believing that everything is a part of God, and therefore God is an impersonal force, who is disinterested in humanity. Spinoza described trying to have a relationship with God as equivalent to trying to have a relationship with nature. I disagree with the pantheist view, because it seems to me like less of a theism and more a form of atheism. Just like the idea that if everyone were given a million dollars, then a million dollars would be worthless; if everything is God then nothing is God. Also the idea of God existing in everything and everyone is fundamentally opposed to God's nature- which is unchanging, and things change therefore they cannot be God.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As a person who has grown up and still remains a Christian, I really like the way you answered this question. I've never put too much thought into why I disagree with pantheism and its relation to God, but this was really insightful. If I am to believe in God, I am to see Him in nature, not as nature. It is his creation, not Him in the flesh.

      Delete
  6. FL 3
    In 1835 The New York Sun reported that, "famous astronomers at a new superpowerful telescope in South Africa had discovered life on the moon!" They sold 100,000 copies and excluding a few sceptics, the majority of people in New York believed them.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Spinoza's assertion on the pantheism of God is actually the first coherent argument that a religious philosopher has made on the topic up to this point in our reading. The logic that an infinite god must, by definition, be everything that we see and are is irrefutable. If god is in fact not everything we see and know and here and think, then he must therefore be a finite being.

    ReplyDelete
  8. John Locke's claim about what makes an individual seems a little pointless to me. What is the purpose of this notion that a man is only defined by his memory, other than the argument about heavenly transfer. Furthermore, even if there was a practical application for this claim, it's impossible to prove-- or really even support-- so in truth it's all just conjecture.

    ReplyDelete
  9. HWT 2
    John Locke’s concept of self or soul is that the self is made of the unity and continuity of its mental life. The body is just a vessel containing the self. For this reason, one could believe that they will be able to live on after death.

    ReplyDelete
  10. HWT 4
    When he went to Japan, Baggini found the cultural stereotypes of Japan being a conformist society where discipline trumps emotion to be inaccurate. Instead, he noticed that people were very warm, more social than conformist, and their discipline was because of wanting what was in the best interest of everyone and not out of a desire to fit in with the crowd.

    ReplyDelete
  11. HWT 6
    Monty Python made the point that stating that they’re individuals does not mean that the group possesses individuality. Individuality is shown rather than said.

    ReplyDelete
  12. 2. If god is _____, there cannot be anything that is not god; if _____, god is indifferent to human beings. Is that how you think about god?

    If god is (infinite)... ...if (fact), god is...
    I partly disagree. While I do believe God is infinite, I do not think God is entirely indifferent to human beings. While it is the rationalist's way to live this way, it is not a perspective I personally cannot understand. Unfortunately, that is a bit of skepticism coming out of my end.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is similar to my view. I believe God is infinite and unchanging, but I also believe He is personal. We are His creation and He has shown me and so many others I know that He is always present and shows His love. I believe God is infinite in the way that He is beyond comprehension. I don't think that nature is God, but He designed it and cares for it.

      Delete
  13. Wyatt Andrews H01
    1. Spinoza believed God was all things. This is a form of pantheism. This idea does not even manage to create a god it simply is nature. If God is the creator (which seems to be the most basic requirement, questions about his attributes may be discussed but creation is the universal prerequisite) then he must be outside of his creation.
    If God is His creation then he could have never created it unless you are to argue that he created Himself which is a paradox.

    ReplyDelete
  14. 4. experience in life; blank space. The ability to learn from our brain helps us learn from our experience.
    5. Psychological; overlapping. You know you’re the same person you were at age three through maintaining your bodily autonomy with your memories. If you can’t remember anything about your past, there’s no way to say what you were.
    6. Life, liberty, and property. To invent the rights means to say that the rights weren’t there to begin with. That makes it seem more like a political right than a human right.

    ReplyDelete
  15. H02 - LHP 1
    This view is called pantheism. I believe that this view is interesting, but not one I agree with. I don't think that this idea would make sense. I don't believe in any God or gods or anything like that, but even if I did, this idea doesn't seem to make much sense to me.

    ReplyDelete
  16. H02 - LHP 3
    Determinist believed that free will is an illusion. I don't think it's consistent to choose to be deterministic.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Adriana Ramirez Speis H03
    LHP
    1. Spinoza's view, that God and nature (or the universe) are the same thing, is called _______. What do you think of that view?
    The view that God and the universe/nature are the same thing is called pantheism. I believe that God influences the universe and that He created it, but I do not believe they are one and the same. I can see God’s beauty and power in nature (rainbows as a reminder of His covenant, the mighty ocean waves, beautiful animals and scenery). Every time the sky is clear enough to see all the stars, I am reminded of how mighty He is and how grateful I am to be alive. Nature is a reflection of god but it is not God.

    2. If god is _____, there cannot be anything that is not god; if _____, god is indifferent to human beings. Is that how you think about god?
    Infinite. If it’s true that God is nature and impersonal, He would be indifferent to human beings. I don’t believe that is the case. God’s care for humanity is revealed through the Bible in both the Father, the Son and the Spirit. The Gospels are full of such moments. Here are some examples:
    Luke 7:12-14 “Just as he neared the gate of the town, a dead man was being carried out. He was his mother’s only son, and she was a widow. A large crowd from the town was also with her. When the Lord saw her, he had compassion on her and said , ‘Don’t weep.’ Then he came up and touched the open coffin, and the pallbearers stopped. And he said, ‘Young man, I tell you, get up!’
    John 11:32-36 “As soon as Mary came to where Jesus was and saw him, she fell at his feet and told him, ‘Lord, if you had been here, my brother wouldn’t have died!’ When Jesus saw her crying, and the Jews who had come with her crying, he was deeply moved in his spirit and troubled. ‘Where have you put him?’ he asked. ‘Lord,’ they told him, ‘come and see.’ Jesus wept. So the Jews said, ‘see how he loved him!’”
    John 14:25-26 “‘I have spoken these things to you while I remain with you. But the Counselor, or the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and remind you of everything I have told you.’”

    ReplyDelete
  18. Adriana Ramirez Speis H03
    LHP
    3. Spinoza was a determinist, holding that _____ is an illusion. Do you think it is possible (and consistent) to choose to be a determinist?
    Spinoza believed free will is an illusion. I don’t believe you can choose to be a determinist because making that choice implies you think that you have a choice which completely contradicts determinism. It’s so silly! If you were a determinist, it wouldn’t be your choice at all.

    4. According to John Locke, all our knowledge comes from _____; hence, the mind of a newborn is a ______.  If Locke's right, what do you think accounts for our ability to learn from our experiences?
    All of our knowledge comes from life experience, meaning the mind of a newborn is a blank slate. If Locke is right, I think it makes perfect sense we can only learn when we encounter something ourselves. You cannot know not to put your hand on a hot stove unless you either do so and are burned or your parents yell at you not to - both of these are negative experiences you will associate with touching the hot stove, so you will have learned not to do it in the future. I agree with this. My parents told me not to do things when I was a kid but I decided to do them anyways and had to learn the hard way why they said not to.

    5. Locke said _____ continuity establishes personal identity (bodily, psychological); Thomas Reid said identity relies on ______ memories, not total recall. How do you think you know that you're the same person now that you were at age 3 (for example)? If you forget much of your earlier life in old age, what reassures you that you'll still be you?
    Locke said psychological continuity establishes personal identity. Thomas Reid said identity relies on overlapping memories, not total recall. This is an interesting question. I am still Adriana Lorena Ramirez Speis, daughter of Carlos Ramirez and Marcia Speis living in Murfreesboro, TN like I was at age three. But now, I place my identity and values in different things. Back then, I probably just cared about toys, my parents and PBS. Scientifically, all of the cells in my body have been replaced by now. I am a different hunk of flesh. I know different things, but I am me. All of my experiences, even ones at age three and four, have shaped me to become the person I am today with the values I hold and choices I make. All of my life has informed the decisions I make. I don’t remember every single thing that has happened to me, and I am sure that will only worsen with age, but I have my family, friends, legal documents and physical mementos to remind me of who I am.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Adriana Ramirez Speis H03
    LHP
    6. Locke's articulation of what natural rights influenced the U.S. Constitution? Do you think it matters if we say such rights are discovered rather than invented?
    As Thomas Jefferson says in Cabinet Battle #1 in the Broadway musical Hamilton, "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness - we fought for these ideals, we shouldn't settle for less." This line in the Declaration of Independence was influenced by John Locke's idea of natural rights, including life, liberty and property. I think the right to life is inherent. I do not think it is created or invented. I think the right to property is. Whoever you believe the first humans were, I think we can all agree they did not own homes. They may have been territorial and said, this is my cave, but I do think that is something invented. I think it's natural to want your own space and things, but property lines and taxes were created.

    ReplyDelete
  20. LHP
    1) Pantheism, while i personally disagree i think it is a view that makes sense in a religious sense; if one believes that the world is sacred because God made the world then i do not think it is a stretch to believe that the world is sacred because god is everything. or if thought about from a omnipotent/omniscient view it would make sense if God is all powerful and all knowing that God is all things

    ReplyDelete
  21. Tessa Wallace H03
    1. pantheism is the answer. I do not agree with this in my opinion I think that they are not the same, but God created the universe and nature. I think that they can’t be the same thing if God created the universe.
    2. I do not think that God is indifferent about humane beings. What I believe is that God created us in his image and that he loves us. So, because I believe this is because then he can’t be indifferent about humans.

    ReplyDelete
  22. 4. Who was P.T. Barnum, and what was his fundamental Fantasyland mindset? Philneas Barnum started as young man who made a living in Connecticut selling lottery tickets, then as an ad copywriter, and most notably as ‘the great early American merchandiser of exciting secular fantasies and half-truths” who realized how easily the American public succumbbed to the unbelievable. His fundamental Fantasyland mindset that helped his career greatly was that “If some imaginary proposition is exciting and nobody can prove it’s untrue, then it’s my right as an American to believe it’s true.”

    ReplyDelete
  23. 5. Whose touring play marked what key milestone in America's national evolution? William F. Cody aka “Buffalo Bill’s” touring play “Buffalo Bill’s Wild West” marked the beginning of movie westerns and evoked nostalgia for the end of the western frontier, fusing reality and fantasy.

    ReplyDelete
  24. 1. Who wrote a memoir of life on the Kentucky frontier that turned him into a "real-life superhero"? (He's in my family tree, btw.) Daniel Boone.

    ReplyDelete
  25. 6. Who was Aunt Jemima? A character from a popular minstrel song. The millers than hired a formerly enslaved African-American woman to be Aunt Jemima.

    ReplyDelete