Your goal in the presentation is to research your topic, tell us something important about it that we didn't read in our assigned texts, and lead a brief discussion. Prior to your reporting date, post a brief summary (just a sentence or two), indicate your research sources, and pose a couple of questions for discussion. You can create a powerpoint if you wish, or show a brief video clip, or read from notes or a prepared script, or just talk to us if you're comfortable extemporizing. Prepare to speak for ten minutes, plus five minutes for discussion. If you have a topic preference, indicate that in a comment below.
FEB 15
1. Spinoza's God (and Einstein's) - #6 Aviyonna Stafford; #9 Dale Tilley
2. Thoreau and Emerson - #6 Dustin Roberson; The Chicago Columbian Exposition - #9 Sam Johnstone [FL 15-16]
3. Buddhism and the self [HWT 16-17] - #6 Kloey Jackson; #9 Katie Farrell
FEB 17
1. Leibniz's philosophy-Is this really the best of possible worlds? And what's a "monad"? #6 Conor; #9 Connor
2. David Hume's philosophy-Why be skeptical? And do miracles really occur?-#6 Frank Snow; #9 Luke Schroder
3. #6 David Reyes "What are souls?"; #9 Gerges Cosmic philosophy [HWT 18-19 or FL 17-18]
FEB 22
1. Immanuel Kant vs. Jeremy Bentham: Is ethics about creating the greatest happiness for the greatest number? #6 Becky Vorabouth; #9 Nicholas Miller
2. Arthur Schopenhauer's philosophy of pessimism - #6 Sameria Bohanon; #9 Karmina Ghobrial
3. The rise of virtue ethics - #6 Daniel S.; Moksa and Nirvana - #9 Kaylee [FL 19-20 or HWT 20-22]
FEB 24
1. Charles Darwin's natural selection: its importance for philosophy-#6 Eden Tucker; #9 Phillip Smith
2. Karl Marx's revolutionary philosophy - #6 Bayleigh Elliott; #9 Keegan Barrett
3. Moksa - #9, Andrew Quinn Burton [ FL 21-22 or HWT 23-24]
MAR 1
1. William James's pragmatic philosophy-#6 Joseph Greene; #9 Kayla T.
2. Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy: What's an "ubermensch"? What is "eternal recurrence"?-#6 Weston Williams; #9 Austin Lowrance
3. Impartiality - #6 Liam; Mozi, Mill, and the harm principle - #9 Jarett W. [FL 23-24 or HWT 25-26]
MAR 3
1. Bertrand Russell's "Why I Am Not a Christian" and/or "The Conquest of Happiness" - #6 Aric Gilmack; #9 Clint Gregory (Conquest of H.)
2. The French Existentialists (Sartre, de Beauvoir, Camus) - #6 Cole Caccavaro; #9 Michelle Saavedra-Leon
3. The distinctiveness of American pragmatism #6 Riley [HWT 27-28]
(More to follow, midterm presentations conclude after Spring Break)
Still to be scheduled: #6 Nicholas; Allison, Daoism; Cheryl, Freud... #9 Mia on suffering;
Eden Tucker CoPhi 1030-006
ReplyDeleteChoosing from this list, I would like something on the 24th of February.
1st Choice - Charles Darwin's natural selection: its importance for philosophy
2nd Choice - Karl Marx's revolutionary philosophy
Frank Snow Sec.6, I would like to present on FEB 24, "Natural selection" or as my second choice I would like FEB 17, "David Hume's Philosophy-Why be skeptical? And do miracles really occur?".
ReplyDeleteWeston Williams sect 6, I would like to present March 1st, over Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy: What's an "ubermensch"? What is "eternal recurrence"? as my first choice. If not I will gladly take Williams Jame's pragmatic philosophy as my second choice
ReplyDeleteBayleigh Elliott Sec. 6.Here are my first and second choices.
ReplyDelete1. Karl Marx's revolutionary philosophy
2. Charles Darwin's natural selection: its importance for philosophy
My first choice for Feb 17th
ReplyDelete1.David Hume's philosophy-Why be skeptical? And do miracles really occur?
2. Second Choice, Arthur Schopenhauer's philosophy of pessimism for Feb 22nd
Section 6
section 09
Delete1. Bertrand Russel -conquest of happiness
2.Immanuel Kant vs. Jeremy Bentham
3.
1. My first choice is Charles Darwin's natural selection: It's importance for philosophy
ReplyDelete2. My second choice would be 2. David Hume's Philosophy-Why be skeptical? And do miracles really occur?
Section 9
ReplyDelete1. David Humes philosophy
2. Bertrand Russel
Luke Schroder ^
DeleteSection 9
ReplyDeletemy topic choice is Charles Darwin's Natural Selection: It's Importance to Philosophy
^ my second choice is Karl Marx Revolutionary Philosophy
DeleteSection 9
ReplyDeleteMy preferred topic choice would be Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy “eternal reoccurrence”
My first choice would be "The Conquest of Happiness", and for my second choice, "What is eternal recurrence".
ReplyDeleteSection 9
ReplyDeleteMy first choice would have to be "Karl Marx's revolutionary philosophy"
2d choice?
DeletePosted for Karmina Ghobrial: #9 My first choice is Arthur
ReplyDeleteSchopenhauer's philosophy of pessimism if possible.
Posted for Michelle Saavedra-Leon #9: My choices for presentation is Bertrand Russell's "The Conquest of Happiness" and The French Existentialists (Sartre, de Beauvoir, Camus).
ReplyDelete1. My first choice would be Mar 1. William James's pragmatic philosophy
ReplyDelete2. Second Choice would be Mar 3. The French Existentialists (Sartre, de Beauvoir, Camus)
Section 6
Section 6
ReplyDeleteChoice 1 French existentialists
Choice 2 Bertrand Russel "Why I am not a Christian"
Section 6
ReplyDelete1. Arthur Schopenhauer's philosophy of pessimism
2. William James's pragmatic philosophy
Those are already taken. 3d choice?
DeleteHere are my topic preferences:
ReplyDelete1. Immanuel Kant vs. Jeremy Bentham: Is ethics about creating the greatest happiness for the greatest number?
2. Charles Darwin's natural selection: its importance for philosophy
3. TBA: Topic - How the World Thinks (Feb. 15)
Section 6.
Posted for Frank Snow #6:
ReplyDeleteMy first choice:
Charles Darwin's natural selection: its importance for philosophy
Second Choice:
William James's pragmatic philosophy
Third Choice:
David Hume's philosophy-Why be skeptical? And do miracles really occur?
Section 9
ReplyDeletePreferred topic preference: Immanuel Kant vs. Jeremy Bentham: Is ethics about creating the greatest happiness for the greatest number?
section #9
ReplyDelete1st: David Hume
2nd: Arthur Schopenhauer
Already taken, please make another selection.
DeleteVictor Frankl or "The Will to Meaning"
DeleteAbsurdism
Kierkegaard's "Sickness unto Death"
Sec 6
ReplyDelete1. Bertrand Russell
2.French existentialist
3. William James
4. Charles Darwin
5. Karl Marx
My presentation is over Bertrand Russell's Why I Am Not A Christian
DeleteQuestions:
Who believes in religion Christianity or otherwise
Do you think religion can make a person better
Is it wrong to be an atheist
Sources:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/russell/
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Bertrand-Russell
https://www.naturalthinker.net/trl/texts/Russell,Bertrand/Religion/Bertrand%20Russell%20-%20Why%20I%20am%20not%20a%20Christian.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRKY2LIvH50
Aviyonna Stafford from section 6. I had trouble posting a comment for the midterm presentation so my first choice is Spinoza's God (and Einstein's). My second choice is Leibniz's
ReplyDeletephilosophy
David Reyes
ReplyDeleteSection 6
My first choice would be a topic regarding souls in Chapter 18 of HWT, scheduled for February 17th.
My second choice would be a topic regarding Daoism in Chapter 20 of HWT, scheduled for February 22nd.
"What are souls?"
DeleteSection #9
ReplyDeleteMy preference is William Jame's Pragmatic Philosphy
March 1
Nicholas Fraley #6
ReplyDeleteMarcus Aurelius
Stoic Pragmatism
Section 6: Topics I want) 1. Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy: What's an "ubermensch"? What is "eternal recurrence"?-#6 Weston Williams; #9 Austin Lowrance, 2. The French Existentialists (Sartre, de Beauvoir, Camus) - #6 Cole Caccavaro; #9 Michelle Saavedra-Leon
ReplyDeleteThose are already taken, please select a topic/date without a classmate's name next to it.
DeleteMarch 3rd Topic to be announced [related to something in HWT 27-28)
Delete- I want to do my presentation on Daoism
Kloey Jackson Section 006
ReplyDeleteI would like Feb 15th Topic #3
Ok, see if you can pin that down more precisely by finding a topic in HWT 16 or 17.
DeleteGerges Basta
ReplyDeleteSection #009
I would like to report on Cosmic Philosophy for my first choice. My second choice would be a topic on Anti-natalism and some its history.
I would like to do this on February 17th or February 24th.
Ok, Cosmic philosophy on the 17th
DeleteConor Lumley Cophi 1030 06
ReplyDeleteFeb 17- Leibniz and the monad
If this is taken, could I do a presentation on bro-Platonism and how it relates to platos unwritten teachings as recorded by Aristotle? On any day
DeleteNeo***
DeleteI was curious about bro-Platonism...
DeleteBut you can have Leibniz
Maybe next time
DeleteSection 9
ReplyDeleteMarch 3
"Problem of Suffering"
You can do that topic, but probably post-Spring Break
DeleteDaniel Stott, #6
ReplyDeleteI would like to compare and contrast the rise of virtue ethics in the east and west.
Feb 22, HWT ch. 21
Section 9
ReplyDeleteMarch 1st
Friedrich Nietzsche's Ubermensch
Otherwise, no preference
Taken. You can do Mozi, Mill, and the harm principle (see HWT p.304)
DeleteSection 6
ReplyDeleteMarch 1st
I'd like to present on the question of whether or not impartiality could be morally sound. (HWT Chapter 25)
Section 9
ReplyDeleteFirst Choice: March 1st, Philosophical History of Impartiality (HWT Chapter 25)
Second Choice: February 24th, Moksa (HWT Chapter 23)
Section 9
ReplyDeleteI would like to depict the differences between Moksa and Nirvana (HWT Chapter 23) - February 22nd
section 6
ReplyDeletei would like to do something in HTW 27-28 on march 3rd
How about the distinctiveness of American pragmatism (see HWT p.331)...
DeleteI'm not sure if my reply was posted above but I'd like to go something on March 3rd related to something in HWT 27-28. I was wanting to do my presentation on Daoism.
ReplyDeleteOr HWT 25-26 on March 1st
DeleteSorry, didn't see your earlier request in time. You can do Daoism, though, date tba.
Deletesection 9. if leibniz isnt taken then leibniz, if it is i dont have a preference
ReplyDeleteCan I get something assigned to me from Hwt?
ReplyDeletesection 9^
DeleteSection 6
ReplyDeleteMy presentation topic is over the question "what are souls?". The idea of a soul is complex, and in my presentation I will explore different ideas to help answer the question presented.
Discussion Questions:
1. Do you agree more with the Western philosophies or Christian philosophies regarding souls?
2. Do you believe that souls are immortal?
3. Do you think there is such a thing as a good/bad soul?
Sources:
1. How the World Thinks by Julian Baggini
2. https://www.ligonier.org/learn/articles/the-origin-of-the-soul
3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60NWwHvDp08
My presentation:
https://www.slideshare.net/DavidReyes443526/philosophy-presentation-1-251190633
Gerges Basta
ReplyDeleteSection 9
My presentation is all about Cosmic Philosophy. Cosmic Philosophy is a very broad subject and cannot be very narrowed down to one simple thing; however, you can choose from a variety of different theories and ideas to talk about. In my presentation, I will be covering three things:
1. I will define what Cosmic Philosophy is as a subject.
2. I will discuss who Eratosthenes is and how he figured out the Earth's circumference.
3. Finally, I will discuss the Einstein's theory of the Fourth Dimension.
Some discussion questions:
1. What did you think about Eratosthenes's method of figuring out the Earth's circumference?
2. Do you believe in a celestial being that exists outside of our three-dimensional world? How about aliens?
3. Do you believe that there could be even more than four dimensions to our universe?
4. What other questions about Cosmic Philosophy do you have?
Works Cited:
Abott, Edwin A. Flatland. Antiquarius, 2021.
Burghers, M. The Holy Bible. Printed at the Theatre in Oxford, and Are to Be Sold by Moses Pitt ... Peter Parker ... Thomas Guy ..., 1680.
Flasch, Jane. "RIT Research Helps Prove Einstein's 4th Dimension Theory." WHAM, WHAM, 12 Feb. 2016, https://13wham.com/news/top-stories/rit-research-helps-prove-einsteins-4th-dimension-theory.
Performance by Carl Sagan, YouTube, 24 Apr. 2009, https://youtu.be/G8cbIWMv0rI. Accessed 15 Feb. 2022.
Smeenk, Christopher, and George Ellis. "Philosophy of Cosmology." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University, 26 Sept. 2017, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmology/.
"The Fourth Dimension and the Bible." The Fourth Dimension and The Bible, http://www.math.brown.edu/tbanchof/Yale/project13/bible.htm#:~:text=William%20Anthony%20Granville%2C%20author%20of,Hebrews%2011%3A5%20describe%20Enoch
"This Month in Physics History." American Physical Society,https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200606/history.cfm
Short summary: Section 9
ReplyDeleteMy presentation is over Leibniz, his philosophical and mathematical legacy, and his monad theory
Discussion Questions
• Do you think this is the best of possible worlds?
• Who do you believe invented calculus first?
• Why does the universe exist?
Works Cited:
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPCzEP0oD7I
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVF4BpksrPU
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monadology
• https://www.britannica.com/topic/best-of-all-possible-worlds
• https://www.britannica.com/topic/monad
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axZTv5YJssA
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UKGPOwR-iw
Summary: Immanuel Kant and Jeremy Bentham have strong opposing views from one another. Kant believes each action should be morally just while Jeremy Bentham thinks that the outcome and consequences are what truly matters.
ReplyDeleteDiscussion Questions:
Kant believes we have an absolute duty to always tell the truth. Do you believe that we should always tell the truth? Even if you have “good” intentions, is lying still wrong?
Crash Course: “If you have the ability to stop a killer, and you don’t, are you morally pure because you didn’t kill? Or are you morally dirty because you refused to do what needs to be done?”
Kant vs. Bentham: Whose view do you agree with more? Disagree?
Sources:
A Little History of Philosophy by Nigel Warburton
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsgAsw4XGvU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bIys6JoEDw&ab_channel=CrashCourse
https://iep.utm.edu/kantview/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant/
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Immanuel-Kant
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-a739VjqdSI&ab_channel=CrashCourse
https://iep.utm.edu/bentham/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bentham/
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jeremy-Bentham
Section 6.
Section 9
ReplyDeleteMy presentation will be covering Arthur Schopenhauer and his philosophy of pessimism. Although Schopenhauer’s philosophy has many different angles that could be approached, I will be doing my best to give insight on a little bit of everything to try and perceive his philosophy as a whole. To do so, I will discuss who Arthur Schopenhauer is and what led him to his philosophy, his idea of the world as Will and representation, his basis of ethics, how he believes we can forget the suffering of the world, and how to see part of his philosophy in our own day-to-day lives.
Discussion Questions:
1. Can true happiness really be achieved throughout one’s life?
2. Are goals still worth being achieved even though they lead to us just setting more of them?
3. Is it selfish of humans to continue to procreate, knowing that the child will suffer in the world?
4. This is a question that is debated in our world: What is more important in life, the destination, or the journey it takes to get there?
Sources:
Aeonmag. (n.d.). How Schopenhauer's thought can illuminate a midlife crisis: Aeon ideas. Aeon. Retrieved February 22, 2022, from https://aeon.co/ideas/how-schopenhauers-thought-can-illuminate-a-midlife-crisis
Arthur Schopenhauer and his pessimistic philosophy - JSTOR. (n.d.). Retrieved February 22, 2022, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25109759.pdf
Wicks, R. (2021, September 9). Arthur Schopenhauer. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved February 22, 2022, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/schopenhauer/#4
YouTube. (2020, July 27). Schopenhauer explained: The World as will and representation (all parts). YouTube. Retrieved February 22, 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-djIdl8WO4&ab_channel=Weltgeist
Summary: Schopenhauer's view of philosophy is way different than what others perceived philosophy was. Schopenhauer's philosophy is based on that reality is not what we view, that we all have our own personal filters we live through.
ReplyDeleteDiscussion Questions: What does happiness mean to you?
Do you take a moment every day to stop and look at the beautiful world around you?
Do you believe we are living through filters as Schopenhauer emphasized?
Works cited:
https://iep.utm.edu/schopenh/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cyq02jZV0g
Little History by Ernst Gombrich
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_forms
Section 6
Feb. 22 Midterm Presentation
ReplyDeleteImmanuel Kant v. Jeremy Bentham: Is ethics about creating the greatest happiness for the greatest number?
Both Immanuel Kant and Jeremy Bentham have important takes and perspectives on the overall question of Morality. In my presentation I will highlight their contribution to Moral debate and introduce their opposing viewpoints and how they shape modern day thinking.
Discussion Questions:
Is Kant's philosophy a practical one in the world as we know it to be? Why or why not?
Jeremy Bentham says happiness is all about how you feel. Happiness is pleasure and the absence of pain. Do you agree with this definition of happiness?
Utilitarianism is deemed universal because of its basis on intuition. Is it intuitive to accept personal pain and suffering for the greater good?
Which of these philosophical viewpoints is more relative to modern day society?
Works cited:
Kant, Immanuel, et al. Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals. Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1949.
Crimmins, James E. “Jeremy Bentham.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University, 8 Dec. 2021, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bentham/.
Johnson, Robert, and Adam Cureton. “Kant's Moral Philosophy.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University, 21 Jan. 2022, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/.
Shermer, Michael. “Does the Philosophy of ‘The Greatest Good for the Greatest Number’ Have Any Merit?” Scientific American, Scientific American, 1 May 2018, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/does-the-philosophy-of-the-greatest-good-for-the-greatest-number-have-any-merit/.
Section 9. Nicholas Miller
Section 9
ReplyDeleteFeb 24th Presentation: "Moksa"
My presentation will be covering the perspective of Moksa (Moksha) in Indian philosophy/religion. To summarize the topic in a sentence, Moksa is the "supreme good" or ultimate goal of many Hindu practices.
Discussion Questions:
1. Do you think it is logical to reach Moksa even if it's considered a paradox?
2. Do you think its possible for non-humans to attain Moksa? If so, why or why not?
3. What's the difference between the state of Moksa and heaven?
Sources:
How the World Thinks by Julian Baggini
https://youtu.be/WhTpJxlJi2I?t=170
https://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/hinduism/beliefs/moksha.shtml#:~:text=Moksha%20is%20the%20end%20of,the%20desire%20for%20moksha%20itself.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/moksha-Indian-religion
Section #9
ReplyDeleteMy speech topic is Eternal Recurrence, a thought created by Fredrich Nietzsche. The idea is essentially the life we live will continue to repeat itself in the same sequence with the same experiences for eternity. Some have broken down the cosmological significance of this idea but mostly it is thought of as a practical experiment to evaluate one's life
Discussion Questions:
If you were to repeat this lifetime for eternity. How would this make you feel?
If this thought were to be true, how would you evaluate your life and after evaluation would you continue living as you are or would you try to make a change?
Given this is the truth of life would you be happy or become cynical?
Sources:
https://philosophynow.org/issues/137/Eternal_Recurrence_Revisited
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nietzsche/#EterRecuSame
Section #9
ReplyDeletePresentation Topic: Mill's Harm Principle
Summary: The core ethos of The Harm Principle is that people should be allowed to live as they wish so long as they do not impose harm upon others. Additionally, the only place of government is to intervene in someone's life only if that intervention will prevent or reduce harm to others.
Discussion Questions:
Does the Harm Principle, ironically, have potential to inflict more harm than benefit in society?
While the Harm Principle advocates for freedom of speech, is it possible that this could cause harm for individuals that take offense to aforementioned speech?
In a society that upholds the Harm Principle, should government be allowed to enforce general restrictions/morals that would reduce universal harm to society?
Sources:
Turner, Piers Norris. “‘Harm’ and Mill’s Harm Principle.” Ethics, vol. 124, no. 2, The University of Chicago Press, 2014, pp. 299–326, https://doi.org/10.1086/673436.
Holtug, Nils. “The Harm Principle.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 5, no. 4, Springer, 2002, pp. 357–89, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27504250.
Section 6
ReplyDeletePresentation topic: William James's Pragmatic Philosophy.
Summary: Pragmatism is a more methodical approach to measuring the truth of an idea by experimenting and observing the practical outcome. James helped pioneer pragmatism.
Discussion Questions: What do you think are some of the benefits of Pragmatism?
What do you think are some of the criticisms of pragmatism?
How do you think James's early life drew him to pragmatism?
Sources:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism-ancient/
https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/culture-magazines/pragmatism-william-james
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pragmatism/
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/5116/5116-h/5116-h.htm
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism-ancient/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/james/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=42&v=M4X4yHLfC88&feature=youtu.be
Frank Snow
ReplyDelete02/24/2022
David Hume's philosophy
Why be skeptical? Do miracles really occur?
David Hume was a Scottish enlightenment philosopher that was known for his views on empiricism, skepticism, and naturalism. He was born May 7, 1711, and died on august 25, 1776 at the age of 65. Skepticism is when people seek to question what they think they know. This would either strengthen their belief or standpoint or change what view they had depending on if they can support their present view on a topic. David Hume took the idea of skepticism a little further and said to “challenge the knowledge of the unobserved”. This idea of Hume’s turns to two subjects within skepticism: The relations of ideas and Matters of fact. The relations of ideas are things that people know for certain or things that are known to be true no matter what. For example, people know that the sun will always rise in the east and set in the west, or the idea of a square or rectangle always having four sides. These are undeniable and cannot be proven to be false. Matters of facts is the idea of something being true at the time but at other times its false. For example, as I am writing this paper it is warm and dark outside, but when someone reads this, it may be raining or cold. Therefore, the fact that it is warm and dark outside right now is true, but it will not always be. Hume also dives into the question if miracles really exist. A miracle is a violation of the normal laws of nature by some supernatural agent. David Hume’s view on this is that miracles are just highly unlikely circumstances happening. He also went a step further and believed If not seen by yourself don’t believe it and even if you do see it yourself, scientific reasoning should make you believe it’s just a coincidence more than a miracle.
James Anisi
ReplyDeleteSection 9
My topic is the Australian philosopher Peter Singer.
Singer is an Australian utilitarian philosopher and proponent of "practical ethics". He is often considered the most influential philosopher alive due to his political and social impact on the worlds of animal rights, poverty relief, humanitarianism, and many more. As a utilitarian, Singer believed in maximizing happiness and minimizing suffering, which became the main focus of his ideology for both his personal life and activist career.
Discussion Questions:
1. Are we morally obligated to always act for the greater good? If not, why?
2. Are babies less valuable than adults as Singer claims? If so, does this justify infanticide?
3.Is Singer ableist to consider disabilities as problems to fix and suffering to avoid?
4. How many of you would be willing to save a child from drowning if it meant ruining new and expensive shoes?
5. If you could save a child overseas for the same price, would you write a check and donate the money to charity?
6. Is saving someone yourself morally comparable to donating the money to do such?
Sources:
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Peter-Singer
https://egs.edu/biography/peter-singer/
https://ethics.org.au/big-thinker-peter-singer/
https://uchv.princeton.edu/people/peter-singer
https://petersinger.info/about-me-cv
ReplyDeleteTaylor Patterson
Section 9
Bertrand Russell’s “The conquest of happiness
Summary: Bertrand Russell wrote the conquest of happiness to discuss what makes us unhappy in life and how we can work to find the happiness in our lives. I will discuss the some major themes of unhappiness and how to alter them in hope of a happier life.
Discussion questions:
1. Do you agree that having too much self-interest could lead to unhappiness?
2. Is it selfish to try and depart from social pressures and find your happiness in yourself / in your loneliness ?
3. How can your happiness contribute to your unhappiness in the long run or do you even think it can?
Sources:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/one-among-many/200905/russell-happiness
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Bertrand-Russell
\https://daily-philosophy.com/the-conquest-of-happiness/
The Conquest of Happiness by Bertrand Russell
Section #9
ReplyDeleteVictor Frankl - The Will to Meaning
Victor Frankl - came up with the Will to Meaning.
He was an Austrian psychologist born in 1905 in Vienna.
He was sent to a concentration camp in 1942 with his parents and his wife. His father, mother, brother, and wife all died in the concentration camps. It was from his experiences in the concentration camps that he really formulated his ideas of logotherapy and the will to meaning. The Will to Meaning is his idea that all humans are inherently driven by a personal sense of meaning in their lives.
This worked to help a patient release a sense of meaning in his life.
?s
Do you think humans ultimately seek meaning, pleasure, or power?
What do you think gives Life meaning?
https://www.pursuit-of-happiness.org/history-of-happiness/viktor-frankl/
Man's Search for Meaning, Victor Frankl (1946)
Mia Freeman
ReplyDeleteSection 9
Summary: I am presenting on the theological argument of the problem of suffering, which questions the idea of God. Philosophers such as Epicurus and David Hume use this to argue the power and existence of a God. I will be looking and discussing the problem from a different view point compared to the late thinkers.
Discussion Questions:
What is your definition of a good God? Would you consider someone as good for allowing you to do whatever you like regardless of the outcome? Or for someone who is willing to guide and correct one’s actions for the better?
Where do you believe evil comes from?
What is your take on the problem of suffering?
Sources:
“The Problem of Pain” by C.S. Lewis
Holy Bible
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evil/
https://www.britannica.com/topic/problem-of-evil
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/8199-is-god-willing-to-prevent-evil-but-not-able-then
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Moloch-ancient-god