Midterm Essay, Simon Pergande, 10/11/20
Sitting at a round marble table coated with linear patterns of black and white squares I sat waiting amidst the loneliness of an abandoned yet magnificent park ground. I turn to see remnants of old swings, benches, and playgrounds stood still, overtaken by natures branches and vines that wrapped around any structure to be found. When I turn back towards the table, Nigel Warburton approaches the table, adjusting his glasses as well as the sleeves of his casual black suit as he crosses his hands with a business tone. Kurt Anderson, with a similar appearance of a black suit adorned with the addition of a striped mahogany tie rapidly approaches the table and joins the table with a quick and hasty manner seeming determined to hop into conversation with quick wit. Finally, Julian Baggini, with a calm and collected self-essence as expressed through his brown jacket and grey button-up breaking the ice with, “Good evening gentlemen”. Everyone acknowledges with a nod. I start off the meeting with a set of two questions for the determined men to reason upon:
(1). "Do you think philosophy can help people learn to respect truth, facts, reality, and one another, and to reject falsehood, superstition, selfishness, polarization, partisanship, and mutual hostility based on differences of race, religion, ethnicity, nationality, belief, etc.? If so, how? If not, why not?
(2). “How would you answer William James's "really vital question for us all: What is this world going to be? What is life eventually to make of itself?"
Kurt Andersen, author of Fantasyland, springs in to answer the question: Philosophy can certainly pull Americans out of the “long temporary detour”; “If we’re on a bender, suffering the effects of guzzling too much fantasy cocktail for too long, if that’s why we’re stumbling, manic and hysterical, mightn’t we somehow sober up and recover?” (FL 11). It can help for sure but with the way that Americans have become ingrained with the idea of post-fact thinking, the challenge is real. Reality is questionable, facts are altered, truth is malleable, selfishness leads to mutual hostility as we have seen progress in America for too long. If we are willing to change for the better, we must turn away from the rising peak of Fantasyland and hope that our nation regains balance and composure (FL 440). To answer William James’s question, we can only hope that life makes itself into a truthful coexistence of humans across all races, sexes, religions, ethnicities, nationalities, and beliefs. If this can happen…the world will truly become less partisan, less polarized, and more balanced.
Julian Baggini, with charm and composure proceeds to answer the question: Philosophy, as old as human civilizations, is the foundation of cultures across the globe. Our philosophies with regards to the world, whether recognized or not, play a significant role in our lives. To respect one another, and to minimize mutual hostility, we must get to know each other. “Getting to know others required avoiding the twin dangers of overestimating either how much we have in common or how much divides us. Our shared humanity and the perennial problems of life mean that we can always learn from and identify with the thoughts and practices of others, no matter how alien they might at first appear.” (HWT 19). What is the world going to be and what will life make of itself? Well, it is hard to say but it is possible to say that world, through more complex interactions that continue evolving, will come to understand others better over time and we may see more positive interactions to come.
Nigel Warburton, author of A Little History of Philosophy, positively chimes in: Philosophy is an amazing basis for the discussions of truth and reality and will bring humans closer together for a discussion as the such that is had at this very marble table. The way that Socrates engaged in conversation with all those who would speak with him, to the way Aristotle wondered about eudaimonia is how we can come closer together. From A Little History of Philosophy, the conclusion statement reads: “Philosophy began with awkward questions and difficult challenges; with gadfly philosophers like Peter Singer around, there is a good chance that the spirit of Socrates will continue to shape its future.” (LH 245). Hopefully the world will be a table of discussion, consisting of multiple people representing a broad range of perspectives, speaking to one another with a fashion that will make the world a place we will all be happy to live in.
And so, the 3 philosophers and I sat at the table chatting away as we enjoyed the peace and serenity of the world around us. A world crawling with life, memory, joy, and humanity.
Nigel Warburton: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxssJsm_2so
Kurt Andersen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_lozqi8u4E&t=171s
Julian Baggini: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJTpmYsWQSo
Simon, thanks for going first. You're still planning to edit this draft and include more "bloggish" content (links, graphics etc.), right?
ReplyDeleteYes, so far I only have links to YouTube videos involving the authors! I will browse the internet some more and see if I can find additional content.
DeleteThe links and videos should be embedded in the text, let me know if you're not sure how to do that.
DeleteI appreciate the courteous and respectful tone of your conversation, and the positive emphasis of that concluding reminder that the world (whatever else is wrong with it) is still a wonder.
ReplyDelete