We speak today of the Socratic method—the exploration of ideas through questions and answers. We often imagine the method to be a kind of "sauce," Callard writes, which we can pour over any intellectual endeavor. Professors love the Socratic method: they enjoy peppering their students with questions, partly to test them, partly to humble them so that they're ready to learn. We're also generally familiar with a style of contentious discussion in which we try to poke holes in one another's arguments. "We feel sure that we already are being Socratic," Callard observes.
Yet if all Socrates had done was pioneer the Q. & A., he probably wouldn't have been sentenced to death by his fellow-Athenians. In fact, his intervention was both more radical and more specific. Socrates, Callard argues, inaugurated a whole way of life—a new way of being a person. It's possible not just to employ the Socratic method, in other words, but to live by it. Doing this entails allowing yourself to be questioned about the basic ideas through which you've organized your existence. This is an uncomfortable, even painful, process, since, Callard writes, "by the time we have the conceptual wherewithal to wonder about how we should live our lives, we've long been taking heaps of answers for granted." We're born, we grow up, and before we know it we've made choices that depend on certain ideas. Believing in valor, we join the military; thirsting for success, we go to law school; drawn to love, we start a family. But what's the purpose of valor? What counts as success? What is love? These are what Callard calls "untimely questions." There's no good time to ask them; doing that could mess up our lives, because the way we live depends on answers we've perhaps unreflectingly accepted. But not asking them means living blindly..."
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/open-questions/should-you-question-everything
Phil.Oliver@mtsu.edu
👣Solvitur ambulando
💭Sapere aude
Phil.Oliver@mtsu.edu
👣Solvitur ambulando
💭Sapere aude
To live and not question is not living. If we were all made to believe the same ideas and the same ideas, then would be no purpose of having a brain to think for ourselves. In actuality, we question everything we do whether we realize it or not. Every choice we make is questioning the possible outcomes or what makes them bearable and what doesn't. And the basis we use to determine what would make a choice good or bad is data collected of the things that we accepted as an answer to ourselves. An answer cannot exist without a question.
ReplyDeleteI agree with what Rothmon stated about isolated certainty. There is no point in questioning everything in oblivion. All that's doing is driving you crazy. Experience and the theory of mind is what makes the weight of those numerous questions bearable. The individual does not live on this earth by themselves, so they shouldn't be expected to understand on the answers alone.