Mason: Hello my name is Mason
Schoonover.
Baggini: Hello Mason.
Mason: First today I am going to
start with you. We are going to focus on things like how Philosophy can help us
respect truths, reality, and one another.
The first question I will ask you is
how can we as humans learn to comprehend and understand the world and respect
facts and truths we are told.
Baggini: One of the biggest things I
can tell you is something called Secular Reason. Have you ever heard of it?
Mason: No I have not.
Baggnin: “Secular Reason is what
almost all schools in modern western Philosophy endorse, implicitly or
explicitly, and it unites them more profoundly than their differences divide
us”(How the World Thinks 71). It is basically a way of thinking where science
is the almighty and can be used to understand almost anything. One thing that
was a huge symbol in the Greek world was the Pantheon. “Under the Pantheon a Greek
architect named Soufflot tied a ball on a string and swung it back and forth.
Over the course of the day it moved to different angles in a perfect circle to
represent the Earth’s rotation”(How The World Thinks 69).
Mason: Can you think of any other
examples where science has helped humans respect truth, facts and reality.
Baggnin: “Scientists have mapped
out the entire DNA and Brain”(How The World Thinks 71). Science can be used in philosophy
in order for people to respect the facts and how the world actually works.
Sciences is the basis of our beliefs because we can explicitly prove it with
experiments and data that has been recovered by valid sources. Most of the time science
can be physically done right in front of somebody in order for them to respects
facts on an idea.
Mason: That makes a lot of since.
Using real data and facts seems to be one of the biggest things that phosphors back
in Greek and Roman times did and still do today in order to get people to
understand logic and ideas.
Next, I would like to talk to you
Kurt Andersen. As Americans, we grow up and kind of think that America is the greatest
country in the world and we have always done everything right. However, this is
not true and I want to hear your take on our history and how we can reject the
falsehoods we have been told and are being told each day on the media.
Andersen: That is a very good
question and something that cannot be answered explicitly. One big event in American
history where the public was deliberately being lied to in America was the cold
war. “I like to call the cold war, if it actually turned into a real war, a war
of mutual destruction”(Andersen 210).
Mason: How do you think the people
were getting lied to?
Andersen. The government told the
people we were so much better than the Soviets that if they attacked us they
would get blown off the earth. That is however not close to being true. It
would have been close the end of humankind if both sides launched its nuclear
warheads at each other and across the world.
Mason: How do we see this today and
how do we reject these sources?
Andersen: Today is extremely technologically
advanced compared to the Cold War. Today we have an endless amount of
information at our finger tips that is almost always politically derived. As
humans, being able to do your own research and come up with conclusions on your past experiences , our history, and fact checking everything we come up
with, we can then begin to reject the falsehoods we have been told by the
people we look up to in our government.
Mason: That is very interesting and
seems like something everyone should look into to practicing more.
Mason: Lastly, Nigel Warburton I would like
to talk to you.
As humans, how do we know what we
believe and how do we know what is right and wrong based on religion,
nationality, and race.
Warburton: That is a very hard
question to ask and almost impossible to answer. “I believe that no one knows anything,
and you shouldn’t rely on what you believe to be true. Everything can be
questioned and everything can be doubted” (A Little History of Philosophy 15).
In our world, there is an alternate way of thinking for everything that can be
talked about. A human grows and is told things by people they look up to. They
then believe the same way as these people which makes them a biased source. One
can always question what they believe in because it is impossible to tell what
is right and wrong.
Mason: Can you expand a little more
and what may you call this?
Warburton: “I call this being a skeptic”
(A Little History of Philosophy 15). One many think they know everything when really,
they know nothing. Being able to look at all sides and experience all sides is something
we must strive to do in order to make strong decisions for each other and ourselves.
Mason: To end it I am going to try and answer
the question from William James who asked, what
is this world going to be? What is life eventually to make of itself?"
I think the world is going through a very big decision-making process. We have two options. We can change our ways and become a world that works together and countries that work together to make advancements to further make the human race successful. Or we can continue the path we are on and we can riot and develop more unrest in the human race. We have incapable leaders in office all over the world and corruption only gets worse. People have become extremely greedy and we need to go back on our roots and advance our race to make the world better.
Not many secularists are comfortable with describing science as "the almighty," though they do appreciate its commitment to reason and evidence.
ReplyDeleteWhat would it mean "to go back on our roots" in secular humanist terms? Do you mean our Enlightenment roots, in the west? Or something more basic, ancient, and global?
"no one knows anything" - Nigel does not defend extreme skepticism, he criticizes it in fact.