| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Successor site to CoPhilosophy, 2011-2020) A collaborative search for wisdom, at Middle Tennessee State University and beyond... "The pluralistic form takes for me a stronger hold on reality than any other philosophy I know of, being essentially a social philosophy, a philosophy of 'co'"-William James
Wednesday, September 29, 2021
Real checks & balances
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
(H03)
ReplyDeleteFrom what I remember, Washington was opposed to the two-party system, and yet it ended up being established anyways. I feel that generally it is unavoidable, as it's one of the most common governing systems and results of democracies. While a 3+ party system would likely be more efficient and less destructive, humans are drawn to picking a side and having an adversary as it is the easiest way to think. Even given 7+ parties, I think that the most likely result would be the rise of two superpowers in politics, with the others regulated to more powerful third parties as they are today. People often claim that a vote for a third party is a vote wasted, as the "us vs them" mentality forces people to take a side without even agreeing with the views they hold just so that the others do not win. A "lesser evil" situation rather than a "greater good". In recent times social media has also used the two-party system to radicalize those on both sides to generate more news and revenue.
3d party votes are usually wasted, in our generally winner-take-all system. We're going to have to try something, 2-party polarization is not working.
DeleteI agree that the tendency does seem to lean towards two "groups." However, As we see in countries like Germany and Canada coalitions between multiple parties seem to form into those two groups. So, at least in theory, you are still voting for your specific interests when you vote for a party. It's just that you know that your party will be working together with others more closely. So for example, if I was focused on climate change, in a system without the first past-the-poll, me voting for a green party candidate does guarantee that I have some chance for them to get into an office. As well as knowing that they will represent that interest in their coalition more closely than someone in a two party system vaguely promising to do something about the environment.
Delete