Up@dawn 2.0 (blogger)

Delight Springs

Thursday, September 30, 2021

Questions Oct 4/5

Presenters, post your report summaries (including at least one discussion question) in the comments space below. 


Study Questions--

1. How did Mill disagree with Bentham about pleasure?


2. What view did Mill defend in On Liberty?

3. What's the benefit to society of open discussion, according to Mill, and what's wrong with being dogmatic?

4. Who did Bishop Wilberforce debate at Oxford in 1860?

5. The single best idea anyone ever had was what, according to whom?

6. What scientific developments since Darwin's time establish evolution by natural selection as more than just a theory or hypothesis?

7. Who was the Danish Socrates, and what was most of his writing about?

8. Why is faith irrational, according to Nigel Warburton?

9. What is "the subjective point of view"?

10. Why was Karl Marx angry? How did he think the whole of human history could be explained?

11. What was Marx's "vision"?

12. What did Marx call religion?

Discussion Questions

  • Was Mill right about Bentham's account of happiness? Would you rather be a sad human or a happy pig? 139
  • Was Mill right about the best way to organize society? 141
  • Was Mill right about the importance of open discussion and free speech? 143
  • What do you think of Huxley's reply to Wilberforce? 144
  • Is Dennett right about Darwin's idea of natural selection? 146
  • Darwin said the subject of God is too profound for the human intellect. 151 Agree?
  • More on the Scopes Trial: re-visit the Fantasyland discussion from last week. Should the judge have allowed "my first landlord" and the other scientific experts to testify? 
  • If you heard a voice purporting to be God, telling you to murder your child, what would you do? 152
  • Do you agree with Kierkegaard that faith is an irrational "leap"? 154
  • Kierkegaard was a Christian who hated the Danish church and reviled "christendom"... Was he a good Christian? 155
  • Is the "subjective point of view all-important"? 157
  • Was Marx right about history as "class struggle"? 159
  • What do you think of "Marx's vision"? 161
FL
  • Do you watch TV (and YouTube, Netflix, etc.) and play video games as much as (or more than) the average American? 151 Do you think you watch too much? Do you read for pleasure?
  • Were Walt Disney and Steve Jobs great Americans? Have their fantasy worlds made life better? 153-4
  • What do you think of Hugh Hefner's Playboy philosophy? 157 [See Carlin Romano, America the Philosophical 272f.]
  • What do you think of Billy Graham? 166-7  Do we need a national ad hoc pastor-in-chief?
  • Should "under God" be in the pledge of allegiance? Should small children be made to recite a pledge? Should any of us pledge blind allegiance to anything? 167
  • Do people who don't like churches and religions need something like Esalen? 178
  • Are you New Age? Do you believe you "create your own reality"? 180
  • Did psychotropics make America more of a fantasyland, in a bad or a good way (or both)? 186
  • Do you talk to your plants? 187
HWT 
  • Is it more important to form good habits or to follow strong principles, in order to build your character and become a good person? Or both?
  • If you pursue excellence (arete) in life will you be more likely to be happy? More or less likely to value happiness? What do these terms mean to you?
  • Would you rather be Socrates dissatisfied or a fool satisfied? 249
  • COMMENT: "Nurture makes actual what nature makes possible." 252
  • Are "manners" important? 255
  • Is Aristotle right about the "mark of virtue"? 257 About "the mean"? 259 Does the Confucian Doctrine of the Mean apply to philosophy itself, and some philosophers' tendency to over-emphasize "one aspect"? 261
  • Should virtue expect a reward? 263
  • What do you think is the best version of The Golden Rule? 264-5
  • Do truly good people need a Golden Rule? 266



 








"Communism Store" (continues)



More DQs
  • Name two or three of your favorite pleasures. Are any of them higher or better than the others? In what way? Are any of yours higher or better than those of a friend whose list includes none of yours? Why or why not?
  • Is state paternalism ever warranted? 
  • Why don't we ever talk about state maternalism?
  • What are the appropriate legal limits on speech and expression in a free society, if any? 
  • How would you reply to Wilberforce's debate question?
  • What do you think was the best idea ever?
  • Do you want a map of your own genome? Why or why not?
  • Do you agree with Darwin that the subject of God is "too profound for human intellect"? Does it mean we should all be agnostic?
  • What would you have done, in Abraham's position? Would you have doubted the "message" or challenged the messenger? 
  • Does it damage the parent-child relationship if Mom or Dad make it clear to the child that they'll always defer to the perceived instructions of a "heavenly father," even including murderous instructions? Does anything "trump the duty to be a good [parent]"?
  • Would you ever do something you considered morally wrong, in the name of faith? 
  • Does taking a "leap of faith" make you irrational?
  • How do you balance your subjective point of view with objectivity, and with the subjectivity of others? What role should inter-subjectivity play, in forming that balance?
  • If you ever own a business will you pay your workers as little as possible and extract as much "surplus value" from them as you can?
  • Is anything in history "inevitable"?
  • Does religion make people more reconciled to oppression and exploitation, and less likely to revolt?

Podcasts-Mill, Darwin, Kierkegaard, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, James...

In Our Time-

MILL. Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the great nineteenth century political philosopher John Stuart Mill. He believed that, 'The true philosophy is the marriage of poetry and logic'. He was one of the first thinkers to argue that a social theory must engage with ideas of culture and the internal life. He used Wordsworth to inform his social theory, he was a proto feminist and his treatise On Liberty is one of the sacred texts of liberalism. J S Mill believed that action was the natural articulation of thought. He battled throughout his life for social reform and individual freedom and was hugely influential in the extension of the vote. Few modern discussions on race, birth control, the state and human rights have not been influenced by Mill's theories. How did Mill's utilitarian background shape his political ideas? Why did he think Romantic literature was significant to the rational structure of society? On what grounds did he argue for women's equality? And how did his notions of the individual become central to modern social theory? With A C Grayling, Professor of Philosophy at Birkbeck, University of London; Janet Radcliffe Richards, Reader in Bioethics at University College London; Alan Ryan, Professor of Politics at Oxford University.

DARWIN. To celebrate the 200th anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin in 2009 and the 150th anniversary of the publication of On the Origin of Species, Melvyn Bragg presents a series about Darwin's life and work.Melvyn visits Darwin's home at Down House in Kent. Despite ill health and the demands of his family, Darwin continued researching and publishing until his death in April 1882.Featuring contributions from Darwin biographer Jim Moore, geneticist at University College London Steve Jones, Darwin expert Alison Pearn of the Darwin Correspondence Project and former garden curator at Down House Nick Biddle

DARWIN Series.As part of Radio 4's Charles Darwin season Melvyn Bragg presented a major series re-assessing Darwin's life and work and asked why Darwin's writing remains such a profound influence on our understanding of the natural world.

KIERKEGAARD. Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the rich and radical ideas of Soren Kierkegaard, often called the father of Existentialism.In 1840 a young Danish girl called Regine Olsen got engaged to her sweetheart – a modish and clever young man called Søren Kierkegaard. The two were deeply in love but soon the husband to be began to have doubts. He worried that he couldn’t make Regine happy and stay true to himself and his dreams of philosophy. It was a terrible dilemma, but Kierkegaard broke off the engagement – a decision from which neither he nor his fiancée fully recovered. This unhappy episode has become emblematic of the life and thought of Søren Kierkegaard - a philosopher who confronted the painful choices in life and who understood the darker modes of human existence. Yet Kierkegaard is much more than the gloomy Dane of reputation. A thinker of wit and elegance, his ability to live with paradox and his desire to think about individuals as free have given him great purchase in the modern world and he is known as the father of Existentialism.With Jonathan Rée, Visiting Professor at Roehampton University and the Royal College of Art; Clare Carlisle, Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Liverpool; John Lippitt, Professor of Ethics and Philosophy of Religion at the University of Hertfordshire.

MARX. Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss Karl Marx. "Workers of the World Unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains", "Religion is the opium of the people", and "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs". That should be enough for most of you to work out whom Radio 4 listeners have voted as their favourite philosopher: the winner of the In Our Time Greatest Philosopher Vote, chosen from 20 philosophers nominated by listeners and carried through on an electoral tidal wave of 28% of our 'first-past-the-post' vote is the communist theoretician, Karl Marx.So, when you strip away the Marxist-Leninism, the Soviet era and later Marxist theory, who was Karl Marx? Where does he stand in the history of philosophy? He wrote in his Theses on Feuerbach, "Philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways, the point, however, is to change it" - which begs the question, is he really a philosopher at all? With Anthony Grayling, Professor of Philosophy at Birkbeck College, University of London; Francis Wheen, journalist and author of a biography of Karl Marx; Gareth Stedman Jones, Professor of Political Science at Cambridge University.

NIETZSCHE. Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss Nietzsche's On The Genealogy of Morality - A Polemic, which he published in 1887 towards the end of his working life and in which he considered the price humans have paid, and were still paying, to become civilised. In three essays, he argued that having a guilty conscience was the price of living in society with other humans. He suggested that Christian morality, with its consideration for others, grew as an act of revenge by the weak against their masters, 'the blond beasts of prey', as he calls them, and the price for that slaves' revolt was endless self-loathing. These and other ideas were picked up by later thinkers, perhaps most significantly by Sigmund Freud who further explored the tensions between civilisation and the individual.

FREUD. Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the relevance of psychoanalysis at the end of the 20th century. It’s 100 years since Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, a term which he coined, published The Interpretation of Dreams. Sixty years after his death, Freud’s influence and the influence of that book, has been felt in the 20th century in everything from the arts, history and anthropology, to of course psychology and even science. Dreams have inspired political speeches, songs, and seduction, captivating and fascinating mankind since time immemorial. For Sigmund Freud, they were the key to unlocking the working of the unconscious. But at the end of the 20th century, has psychoanalysis become too fractured and too insistent on privileging the past over the present to go forward into the future? Has it failed to develop and adapt to an age increasingly dominated by science? With Dr Juliet Mitchell, psychoanalyst, Fellow of Jesus College, Cambridge, Department of Political and Social Sciences; Adam Phillips, psychoanalyst and author of The Beast in the Nursery.

WILLIAM JAMES. Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss 'The Varieties of Religious Experience' by William James. The American novelist Henry James famously made London his home and himself more English than the English. In contrast, his psychologist brother, William, was deeply immersed in his American heritage. But in 1901, William came to Britain too. He had been invited to deliver a series of prestigious public lectures in Edinburgh. In them, he attempted a daringly original intellectual project. For the first time, here was a close-up examination of religion not as a body of beliefs, but as an intimate personal experience. When the lectures were printed, as 'The Varieties of Religious Experience', they were an instant success.They laid the ground for a whole new area of study - the psychology of religion - and influenced figures from the psychiatrist Carl Jung to the novelist Aldous Huxley. To date, James's book has been reprinted thirty-six times and has been hailed as one of the best non-fiction books of the twentieth century.With:Jonathan ReeFreelance philosopherJohn HaldaneProfessor of Philosophy at the University of St AndrewsGwen Griffith-DicksonEmeritus Professor of Divinity at Gresham College and Director of the Lokahi FoundationProducer: Natasha Emerson.

PRAGMATISM. Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the American philosophy of pragmatism. A pragmatist "turns away from abstraction and insufficiency, from verbal solutions, from bad apriori reasons, from fixed principles, closed systems, and pretended absolutes and origins. He turns towards concreteness and adequacy, towards facts, towards action and towards power". A quote from William James' 1907 treatise Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. William James, along with John Dewey and Charles Sanders Peirce, was the founder of an American philosophical movement which flowered during the last thirty years of the nineteenth century and the first twenty years of the 20th century. It purported that knowledge is only meaningful when coupled with action. Nothing is true or false - it either works or it doesn't. It was a philosophy which was deeply embedded in the reality of life, concerned firstly with the individual's direct experience of the world he inhabited. In essence, practical application was all. But how did Pragmatism harness the huge scientific leap forward that had come with Charles Darwin's ideas on evolution? And how did this dynamic new philosophy challenge the doubts expressed by the Sceptics about the nature and extent of knowledge? Did Pragmatism influence the economic and political ascendancy of America in the early 20th century? And did it also pave the way for the contemporary preoccupation with post-modernism? With A C Grayling, Professor of Applied Philosophy at Birkbeck College, University of London and a Fellow of St Anne's College, Oxford; Julian Baggini, editor of The Philosophers' Magazine; Miranda Fricker, Lecturer in Philosophy at Birkbeck College, University of London.
==

Philosophy Bites-
  • Richard Reeves on Mill's On Liberty What are the acceptable limits of individual freedom? John Stuart Mill addressed this question in his classic defence of liberalism, On Liberty (1859). In this episode of Philosophy Bites, Richard Reeves, author of a recent biography of ...

  • Clare Carlisle on Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling

    What is faith? Are human beings capable of it? What part does reason play in life? These and more questions are raised by Søren Kierkegaard's book Fear and Trembling. Clare Carlisle illuminates many of the themes of the book in this inte...
  • Christopher Janaway on Nietzsche on Morality

    Friedrich Nietzsche's The Genealogy of Morality presents a highly original account of the sources of our values. Christopher Janaway, author of Beyond Selflessness: Reading Nietzsche's Genealogy, discusses Nietzsche's influential book in...
  • Aaron Ridley on Nietzsche on Art and Truth

    In this interview Aaron Ridley explores Nietzsche's changing views about the relationship between art and truth including his views about the dionysian and appollonian aspects of existence. Listen to Aaron Ridley on Nietzsche on Art and...
  • Robert Talisse on Pragmatism

    'Truth is what works'. So does Pragmatism work? Robert B. Talisse talks about this important philosophical movement and some of the differences between the ideas of its founders James, Peirce and Dewey in this episode of the Philosophy B...
  • Women of Ideas edited by Suki Finn

    We are delighted to announce that Suki Finn, lecturer in Philosophy at Royal Holloway, University of London, has selected and edited a collection of transcripts of Philosophy Bites interviews with women. This is to be published by Oxford University Press as Women of Ideas on 22nd April 2021. This is the fourth book of interviews from Philosophy Bites. 

    From Amia Srinivasan on gender to Mary Warnock on public philosophy, from Martha Naussbaum on disgust to Onora O’Neill on consent, this new volume features interviews with leading women philosophers on some of the pressing issues in the world today.

    Here is a list of the interviews included in Women of Ideas:

    Amia Srinivasan: What is a Woman?

    Janet Radcliffe Richards: Men's and Women's Natures

    Patricia Smith Churchland: What neuroscience can teach us about morality

    Christine M. Korsgaard: The Status of Animals

    Ashwini Vasanthakumar: Do victims have obligations too?

    Miranda Fricker: Blame and Historic Injustice

    Kimberley Brownlee: Social Deprivation

    Sarah Fine: The Right to Exclude

    Anne Phillips: Multiculturalism and Liberalism

    Jennifer Saul: Implicit Bias

    Martha C. Nussbaum: Disgust

    Elisabeth Schellekens: Disagreement about Taste

    Emma Borg: Language and Context

    Rebecca Roache: Swearing

    Teresa M. Bejan: Civility

    Katherine Hawley: Trustworthiness

    Onora O'Neill: Medical Consent

    Katalin Farkas: Knowing a Person

    Jennifer Nagel: Intuitions about Knowledge

    Susan James: Michel Foucault and Knowledge

    Kate Kirkpatrick: The Life and Work of Simone de Beauvoir

    Katherine J. Morris: Merleau-Ponty on the Body

    Alison Gopnik: Hume and Buddhism

    Katrin Flikschuh: Philosophy in Africa

    Angie Hobbs: Plato on War

    Helen Beebee: Possible Worlds

    Tamar Szabó Gendler: Why Philosophers use Examples

    Rebecca Newberger Goldstein: Progress in Philosophy

    Mary Warnock: Philosophy and Public Life

    About the editor:

    Suki Finn is a Lecturer in Philosophy at Royal Holloway, University of London. She researches in the areas of metametaphysics, the philosophy of logic, the metaphysics of pregnancy, the epistemology of love, and feminist and queer theory. Suki has published her work in various philosophy journals, edited collections, and in the online magazine Aeon. Women of Ideasis Suki’s first book. Suki is on the Executive Committee for the Society for Women in Philosophy UK, and on the Council for the Royal Institute of Philosophy. In her other life, Suki is a musician. Suki is represented by Ben Clark at the Soho Agency.

    Women of Ideas is already available for pre-order:

    ama

And see The Philosopher Queens: The lives and legacies of philosophy's unsung women ($7.99 kindle edition)

Just say Yes (or No, or Maybe, or...)

  LISTEN. Today in Happiness, after our little exam, we'll discuss what it means to Stoics to live in accordance with nature. We'll also consider the shared Stoic-Buddhist aversion to "drug-induced bliss." That's my cue to bring Michael Pollan and William James into the conversation.

The sway of alcohol over mankind is unquestionably due to its power to stimulate the mystical faculties of human nature, usually crushed to earth by the cold facts and dry criticisms of the sober hour. Sobriety diminishes, discriminates, and says no; drunkenness expands, unites, and says yes. It is in fact the great exciter of the Yes function in man. It brings its votary from the chill periphery of things to the radiant core. It makes him for the moment one with truth. Not through mere perversity do men run after it. To the poor and the unlettered it stands in the place of symphony concerts and of literature;

That's a remarkable observation, which he quickly tempered with the crushing corollary that 

it is part of the deeper mystery and tragedy of life that whiffs and gleams of something that we immediately recognize as excellent should be vouchsafed to so many of us only in the fleeting earlier phases of what in its totality is so degrading a poisoning.
So, much as we should wish to affirm the Yes function, we can't sanction the degradation and poisoning. 

Does the same caveat apply to all drugs? James had (pardon the pun) high hopes for nitrous oxide... (continues)

Wednesday, September 29, 2021

Real checks & balances


Run with the stars

Kant wait

 17LISTEN.

“Well, it starts with perseverance. I mean, it starts there,” said Adam Wainwright, whose poetic 17th win of the season in his 17th year with St. Louis led his club to its 17th consecutive victory. “We had to overcome probably the worst baseball I've ever seen a Cardinals team play. We just weren't doing anything right. … It was just understanding that we're a better team than what we were showing and we could go out there and compete with anybody when we play right.
And now I'll stop crowing about my team. For now. Kant probably wouldn't have much to say about them. 

But he had plenty to say about rationality, as has Steven Pinker...

Tuesday, September 28, 2021

Questions Sep 30

 We'll discuss this after the exam.

Kant, Bentham, Hegel, Schopenhauer-LH 19-23, FL 19-20, HWT 20

1. Kant said we can know the ____ but not the ____ world. 

2. What was Kant's great insight?

3. What, according to Kant, is irrelevant to morality?

4. Kant said you should never ___, because ___. Kant called the principle that supports this view the ____ _____.

5. Who formulated the Greatest Happiness principle? What did he call his method? Where can you find him today?

6. Who created a thought experiment that seems to refute Bentham's view of how pleasure relates to human motivation?

7. What did Hegel mean when he spoke of the "owl of Minerva"? What did he think had been reached in his lifetime?

8. What Kantian view did Hegel reject?

9. What is Geist? When did Hegel say it achieved self-knowledge?

10. What "blind driving force" did Schopenhauer allege to pervade absolutely everything (including us)?

11. What did Schopenhauer say could help us escape the cycle of striving and desire?

Discussion Questions
  • Do you think the human mind and its categories are like rose-colored spectacles, permanently preventing us from knowing the "noumenal" world but enabling us to see the "phenomena" more clearly? 111-12
  • Was Kant's "great insight" really a breakthrough? 114
  • Is sympathy irrelevant to morality? 115
  • Have you ever helped someone because you felt sorry for them? Was that a moral action on your part?
  • Should you ever lie? Is Kant's reasoning on this question reasonable, or rational? Is it emotionally intelligent? 117-18
  • What do you think of Jeremy Bentham's auto-icon?
  • Do you agree with the Greatest Happiness Principle? 122 Why or why not? 
  • Is a Felicific Calculus possible or desirable? 123
  • Would you plug in to the Experience Machine? 125 Do you think virtual reality technology will one day make that a real option?
  • If wisdom and understanding come only at a "later stage" of history, is philosophy worth doing now? 126
  • Should Hegel have rejected Kant's view about noumena and phenomena? 128
  • Is Geist real? Is there a "single mind" shared by all humanity? 129
  • Was Hegel being arrogant to claim that Spirit first came to "know itself" in his own books?
  • Was Schopenhauer right about Will? 133
  • Is asceticism "the ideal way to cope with existence"? 136
FL
  • Has the film industry narrowed the perceived distance between fantasy and reality? Is it like a drug? 136-7
  • Is advertising manipulative and misleading? Has it engendered false desires and a confusion about what will make us happy? 138
  • Do you think you would have been fooled by War of the Worlds?
  • Are Americans too preoccupied with celebrity, and celebrities? 140
  • Is the American suburb a mistake, a "happy fictionalization"? 143 Is suburban nostalgia racist? 144
  • What do you think of LA and South Florida as fantasylands? 147-8 Do you want to live there? 
HWT 
  • Did you know there's a Confucius Institute at MTSU? 222 Should there be a Western Philosophy Institute in China?
  • Are there other "bonds" of harmony besides those noted by Mencius? 223
  • What's the difference between harmony and conformity, compliance, sameness, or uniformity? 
  • Would we have a more eastern attitude about harmony and cosmic order in the west if Heraclitus (and Hegel) had "won out" over Plato? 225
  • Do the Chinese actually have greater "family values" than westerners? 227
  • Would you ever denounce your parents for political reasons?
  • Do you feel a moral obligation to visit (and perhaps eventually care for) elderly relatives? 228
  • Is Kant's view about Enlightenment and "maturity" an implicit critique of hierarchical and monarchical societies? 230
  • Do you know any parents who try "to maintain their authority over their children after those children have grown up"? 231
  • Is it disrespectful not to criticize others' views when you disagree with them? 234
  • What do you think of people who are "beyond care" and have "given up"? 235
  • Is/are "yin/yang" two things, or one? 237 Or are they things at all? 238
  • Any comment on "picking yin"? 239 (Keep it clean please.)
  • Are Daoists libertarians? 242
  • Is the Confucian principle of quan anti-Kantian? 243 How about the African concept of ubuntu? 246
  • Was Han China's version of Machiavelli? 244-5




 



 

Schopenhauer and his sidekick "Atman"

"His closest relationships are now with a succession of poodles, who he feels have a gentleness and humility humans lack... He acquires a new white poodle and names her Atman, after the world-soul of the Brahmins..." Consolations of Philosophy
Image result for schopenhauer and atman

Reminds me of...

Image result for grinch and max

But he's still fun to read. He's often clever and amusing, and he's frequently right.
  • “The assumption that animals are without rights and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality.” 
  • “Compassion for animals is intimately associated with goodness of character, and it may be confidently asserted that he who is cruel to animals cannot be a good man.” 
  • “Every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud, adopts as a last resource pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and happy to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority.” 
  • "Man can do what he wills but he cannot will what he wills.” 
  • “We forfeit three-fourths of ourselves in order to be like other people.” 
  • “A sense of humor is the only divine quality of man.” 
When he's wrong, though, he's way wrong.
  • “What disturbs and depresses young people is the hunt for happiness on the firm assumption that it must be met with in life. From this arises constantly deluded hope and so also dissatisfaction. Deceptive images of a vague happiness hover before us in our dreams, and we search in vain for their original. Much would have been gained if, through timely advice and instruction, young people could have had eradicated from their minds the erroneous notion that the world has a great deal to offer them.” 
  • “If children were brought into the world by an act of pure reason alone, would the human race continue to exist? Would not a man rather have so much sympathy with the coming generation as to spare it the burden of existence, or at any rate not take it upon himself to impose that burden upon it in cold blood?” 
The great rational optimist and cynical pessimist, ultimately (like us all) in the same boat. "Shipwreck is a permanent possibility," said William James...

Image result for schopenhauer and hegel

Schopenhauer on Hegel:
“But the height of audacity in serving up pure nonsense, in stringing together senseless and extravagant mazes of words, such as had previously been known only in madhouses, was finally reached in Hegel, and became the instrument of the most barefaced general mystification that has ever taken place, with a result which will appear fabulous to posterity, and will remain as a monument to German stupidity.”

Arthur Schopenhauer, Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, trans. Haldane-Kemp (The World as Will and Idea, vol. 2), London: Kegan Paul, p. 22.

==
William James on Hegel:
Some "Hegelisms" James came up with, when reading Hegel while ingesting nitrous oxide:

What's mistake but a kind of take?
What's nausea but a kind of -ausea?
Sober, drunk, -unk, astonishment.
Everything can become the subject of criticism—how
criticise without something to criticise?
Agreement—disagreement!!
Emotion—motion!!!
Die away from, from, die away (without the from).
Reconciliation of opposites; sober, drunk, all the same!
Good and evil reconciled in a laugh!
It escapes, it escapes!
But——
What escapes, WHAT escapes?
Emphasis, EMphasis; there must be some emphasis in order
for there to be a phasis.
No verbiage can give it, because the verbiage is other.
Incoherent, coherent—same.
And it fades! And it's infinite! AND it's infinite!
If it was n't going, why should you hold on to it?
Don't you see the difference, don't you see the identity?
Constantly opposites united!
The same me telling you to write and not to write!
Extreme—extreme, extreme! Within the extensity that
'extreme' contains is contained the 'extreme' of intensity.
Something, and other than that thing!
Intoxication, and otherness than intoxication.
Every attempt at betterment,—every attempt at otherment,—is a——.
It fades forever and forever as we move.


There is a reconciliation!
Reconciliation—econciliation!
By God, how that hurts! By God, how it does n't hurt!
Reconciliation of two extremes.
By George, nothing but othing!
That sounds like nonsense, but it is pure onsense!
Thought deeper than speech——!

Medical school; divinity school, school! SCHOOL! Oh my
God, oh God, oh God!
The most coherent and articulate sentence which came was this:—
There are no differences but differences of degree between different degrees of difference and no difference...
William James, On Some Hegelisms
==

Arts & Letters Daily search results for “schopenhauer” (5)


2013-07-11 | John Gray against humanism. Influenced by Schopenhauer, Conrad, and an abiding cynicism, the philosopher has lost hope for mankind more »

2014-03-13 | Schopenhauer called noise 'the most impertinent of all forms of interruption,' and he was right. Thus our obsession with silence: the new luxury good more »

2013-10-23 | Schopenhauer dismissed dignity as 'the shibboleth of all perplexed and empty-headed moralists.' But the notion has been revived as a liberal ideal more »

2010-01-01 | 'Hitler kept Schopenhauer's works in his knapsack through WWI, so he claimed. Too bad that he couldn''t actually spell the philosopher''s name' more »

2018-01-27 | Philosophers haven’t had much to say about middle age, but Schopenhauer is an exception. His view of the futility of desire -- getting what you want can make you unhappy -- illuminates the darkness of midlife more »

HEGEL
2011-01-01 | Darwin has displaced Hegel as a political thinker, suggests Francis Fukuyama. Is this the end of the end of history? more »

2016-08-02 | A philosophy of education. Influenced by Hegel and Darwin, John Dewey launched a revolution that overthrew the methods of the day. Hannah Arendt was not pleased more »

2017-07-26 | The tradition of Kant, Hegel, and Habermas has given way to slick performers. Is German philosophy exchanging profundity for popularity? more »

2014-12-04 | For an apostle of alienation, Herbert Marcuse sure was a media star. To think his unsettling blend of Hegel, Marx, and Freud ended up in Playboy more »

2011-01-01 | Hegel goes west. In the 1870s, an odd idea took hold on the American frontier: History had a direction, and it pointed toward St. Louis more »

2018-05-12 | For Plato, uprightness made us human; for Kant, people were inherently bent; Hegel worried about stiffness. Why does posture attract such philosophical attention? more »

2017-05-12 | Since Hegel, philosophers have declared the end of art, meaning that no further progress is possible. In that sense, it’s a good thing: Art is now free to be anything more »
KANT
2014-07-08 | What would Kant do? His maxims, applied to ethical quandaries, seem contradictory, incoherent, a mess. But there's another way more »

2012-11-29 | Harvard wants to enroll the next Homer, Kant, Dickinson. But how likely is it that future philosophers, critics, and artists will be admitted? more »

2015-02-23 | At least since Kant said the 'true strength of virtue is a tranquil mind,' anxiety has been something to avoid. Was he wrong? more »

2015-04-09 | Feeling distracted, as if advertisers, Facebook, and Apple had colonized your mental space? Is silence ever harder to find? Blame Kant more »

2015-08-21 | Kant is associated with optimism, ambition, progress. But he suffered from depression and “general morbid feelings.” His last word: “Enough” more »

2018-08-15 | Kant believed that beautiful art “must always show a certain dignity in itself.” Alfred Brendel disagrees. He believes in musical jokes  more »

2018-09-14 | In 1791, a depressed Austrian woman wrote to Kant seeking advice. She later killed herself. Oh, the folly of asking philosophers for practical advice more »

2015-04-18 | John Searle has a bone to pick with Bacon, Descartes, Locke, and Kant. He blames them for the basic mistake of modern epistemology more »

2017-01-14 | Because the study of logic ended with Aristotle, Kant believed, the field had run its course. But what was logic for in the first place? more »

2016-04-22 | Philosophy has been overrun by Kant and by moralistic rules. We need a version that appeals to people — we need a return to Hume more »

2018-09-06 | Hobbes, Hume, and Kant alike sympathetic to the thought that “there must be something more,” and sensitive to the limits of speculating about God more »

2015-05-13 | From the Greek philosophers to Kant and beyond, theories of the cosmos have been proposed and discarded. Has the expansive debate finally slowed? more »

2016-05-20 | Kant declared fashion "foolish." To Kierkegaard, outer garments kept us from ascertaining inner truth. But clothes are a form of thought, freighted with meaning more »

2017-07-26 | The tradition of Kant, Hegel, and Habermas has given way to slick performers. Is German philosophy exchanging profundity for popularity? more »

2017-11-02 | Kant thought entire civilizations incapable of philosophy. Derrida said China had no philosophy, only thought. Why did Western philosophy turn its back on the world? more »


BENTHAM
2018-02-17 | The comprehensive John Stuart Mill. He was out to combine Bentham with poetry, the Enlightenment with Romanticism, and to span the entire philosophy of his time more »

Podcasts:
Kant's Categorical Imperative
In Our Time-Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss how, in the Enlightenment, Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) sought to define the difference between right and wrong by applying reason, looking at the intention behind actions rather than at consequences. He was inspired to find moral laws by natural philosophers such as Newton and Leibniz, who had used reason rather than emotion to analyse the world around them and had identified laws of nature. Kant argued that when someone was doing the right thing, that person was doing what was the universal law for everyone, a formulation that has been influential on moral philosophy ever since and is known as the Categorical Imperative. Arguably even more influential was one of his reformulations, echoed in The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in which he asserted that humanity has a value of an entirely different kind from that placed on commodities. Kant argued that simply existing as a human being was valuable in itself, so that every human owed moral responsibilities to other humans and was owed responsibilities in turn.

Utilitarianism
In Our Time-A moral theory that emphasises ends over means, Utilitarianism holds that a good act is one that increases pleasure in the world and decreases pain. The tradition flourished in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries with Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, and has antecedents in ancient philosophy. According to Bentham, happiness is the means for assessing the utility of an act, declaring "it is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong." Mill and others went on to refine and challenge Bentham's views and to defend them from critics such as Thomas Carlyle, who termed Utilitarianism a "doctrine worthy only of swine."

Schopenhauer
In Our Time-Melvyn Bragg and guests AC Grayling, Beatrice Han-Pile and Christopher Janaway discuss the dark, pessimistic philosophy of Arthur Schopenhauer.As a radical young thinker in Germany in the early 19th century, Schopenhauer railed against the dominant ideas of the day. He dismissed the pre-eminent German philosopher Georg Hegel as a pompous charlatan, and turned instead to the Enlightenment thinking of Immanuel Kant for inspiration. Schopenhauer's central idea was that everything in the world was driven by the Will - broadly, the ceaseless desire to live. But this, he argued, left us swinging pointlessly between suffering and boredom. The only escape from the tyranny of the Will was to be found in art, and particularly in music. Schopenhauer was influenced by Eastern philosophy, and in turn his own work had an impact well beyond the philosophical tradition in the West, helping to shape the work of artists and writers from Richard Wagner to Marcel Proust, and Albert Camus to Sigmund Freud

Hegel's Philosophy of Right
Free Thinking-What links Beethoven & Hegel's philosophy of freedom? Anne McElvoy talks to New Generation Thinker Seán Williams, Christoph Schuringa, Gary Browning, and Alison Stone about Hegel's discussion of freedom, law, family, markets and the state in his Principles of the Philosophy of Right 1820.

Hegel on Dialectic-In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Robert Stern gives a lucid overview of a key idea from a notoriously difficult writer, Hegel. Listen to Robert Stern on Hegel on Dialectic

Kant's Metaphysics-Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason is a great but difficult work. In this interview for Philosophy Bites A.W. Moore gives an accessible account of the main themes of the book and explains what might have been motivating Kant's approach to metaphysics (no mean feat in under 20 minutes!). Listen to Adrian Moore on Kant's Metaphysics