Up@dawn 2.0 (blogger)

Delight Springs

Wednesday, October 20, 2021

My presentation was on Hannah Arendt 

 

Hannah Arendt is arguably one of the most influential philosophers of the 20th century due to her works discussing the complexities of evil and power in politics. Born in 1906 to a secular Jewish family in Hanover, Germany Arendt grew up in a very turbulent and tumultuous time. The rise of the Nazi Party in the 1930s certainly shaped and influenced the philosophical thought of Arendt. It is also the reason she was forced to flee her home country, Germany; and later it would cause her to have to leave France. After relocating twice to escape the Nazi Party Hannah would move a final time to New York City where she would reside the remainder of her life.  

  

It is in New York City that Hannah Arendt would go on to publish most of her most famous and acclaimed works like The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951), The Human Condition (1958), On Revolution (1963), and Eichmann in Jerusalem (1963). It is through examining these works that one is able to familiarize themselves with Arendt’s philosophy. Her ideas regarding totalitarianism, the nature of evil, and revolutionary thought have stirred a multitude of conversations ranging from scathing criticism to enthusiastic support. One of her most controversial thoughts that is still debated today is her stance on the Eichmann trial where she claims that Eichmann is misrepresented throughout the trail as a villain that acted on the evils stemming from his own heart. Arendt believed that he instead was a thoughtless man that failed to think critically about the tasks he was again. She went on to call this an example of the “banality of evil”.  

 

Discussion Questions 

  1. Do you agree with Arendt’s critics that feel like her perspective on Eichmann and his trial absolve him of some of the guilt associated with his crimes? 

  1. Do you think there are any current/modern examples of “banal evil” in our society? 


    Short Video on Arendt's Major Ideas and Works


    Podcast Discussing "The Banality of Evil"


 
References  

“Arendt, Hannah | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy | An Encyclopedia of Philosophy Articles Written by Professional Philosophers.https://iep.utm.edu/arendt/. Accessed 20 Oct. 2021. 
 

Arendt:The Human Condition (Analysis).” Philosophy & Philosophers, Philosophy & Philosophers, 17 May 2012, https://www.the-philosophy.com/arendt-human-condition-analysis. 
 

College, Bard. “About Hannah Arendt.” Hannah Arendt Center for Politics and Humanities at Bard Collegehttps://hac.bard.edu/about/hannaharendt/. Accessed 20 Oct. 2021. 
 

“Hannah Arendt.” Encyclopædia BritannicaEncyclopædia Britannica, 10 Oct. 2021, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Hannah-Arendt. 
 

Passerin, Maurizio. “Hannah Arendt (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophyhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/arendt/. Accessed 20 Oct. 2021. 
 

Popova, Maria. “The Banality of Evil: Hannah Arendt on the Normalization of Human Wickedness and Our Only Effective Antidote to It – Brain Pickings.” Brain Pickings, 7 Feb. 2017, https://www.brainpickings.org/2017/02/07/hannah-arendt-the-banality-of-evil/. 
 

“The World of Hannah Arendt (March 2001) - Library of Congress Information Bulletin.” Home | Library of Congresshttps://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/0103/arendt.html. Accessed 20 Oct. 2021. 
 

“Why Hannah Arendt Is the Philosopher for Now - New Statesman.” New Statesman, 20 Mar. 2019, https://www.newstatesman.com/culture/2019/03/why-hannah-arendt-is-the-philosopher-for-now. 

6 comments:

  1. This is for Alana Thomas from section 2 btw

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is for Alana Thomas from section 2 btw

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is for Alana Thomas from section 2 btw

    ReplyDelete
  4. Do you agree with Arendt’s critics that feel like her perspective on Eichmann and his trial absolve him of some of the guilt associated with his crimes?

    It would depend on how you think people should be held accountable. On a certain extent if you're determinist then could he control anything he did at all? I think you can argue that accountability comes from taking responsibility for who you are and have done rather than what you could have chosen to do. That's how it often works in leadership positions when one of your teammates makes a mistake. You still take responsibility for the mistake even though you weren't the one that messed up necessarily.

    ReplyDelete