Up@dawn 2.0 (blogger)

Delight Springs

Thursday, November 18, 2021

Questions Nov 22/23

K ch3-Psychology and the Healthy Mind; Principles of Psychology ch9-Habit; K ch 4 Consciousness and Transcendence; Principles of Psychology ch IX The Stream of Thought

1. James wrote Principles of Psychology to answer what question?

2. What did Aristotle say about habit?

3. What realization would make young people give more heed to their conduct?

4. James complained in 1884 that what devoured his time?

5. James thought everybody should do what each day?

6. How is habit "the enormous fly-wheel of society"?

7. There is "no more miserable human being" than ...

8. There is "no more contemptible type of human character" than ...

Discussion Questions:
  • Do you want to "be somebody"? What does that mean? Does it make happiness harder to achieve?
  • Does adult life make it harder to identify your "real" self? 70
  • Is it good that "habit is the enormous fly-wheel of society"? 77
  • Which comes first, happiness or laughter 87
  • Is it bad to entertain emotions you don't act on? Why?
  • Is habit, on balance, good for society?
  • Are there any small habits you'd like to gain or lose? What's stopping you?
  • COMMENT?: Are there any sequences of mental action you want or need to frequently repeat (or stop repeating)?
K ch 4 Consciousness and Transcendence; Principles of Psychology ch IX The Stream of Thought

1. Tragedies that befell him in his 40s led to James's quest for ___.

2. What experience led James to "the taste of the intolerable mysteriousness" of existence?

3. What did James think is sacrificed when we study the mind in objective analytic terms?

4. What did Thoreau say at the end of Walden?

5. His experiments with nitrous oxide gave James what warning?

6. What did James say about his house in Chocorua?



(below)

7. What does James mean by "continuous," when he says consciousness is continuous?

8. What metaphors most naturally describe consciousness?

9. We all split the universe into what two great halves?


Discussion Questions
  • What does "transcendence" mean to you?
  • Do you think you could remain hopeful and happy after losing a child?
  • Will we ever fully understand the origins and nature of consciousness?
  • Does your internal life feel continuous to you, or "chopped into bits"?
  • What does being "woke" mean to you?
  • Does the thought that "this too shall pass" console or comfort you? 104
  • Have you read Michael Pollan's How to Change Your Mind? COMMENTS? 115
  • Was Leonard Cohen right about "the crack in everything"? 116
  • Do you agree with Kaag about Wittgenstein? 124
Any sequence of mental action which has been frequently repeated tends to perpetuate itself; so that we find ourselves automatically prompted to think, feel, or do what we have been before accustomed to think, feel, or do, undmer like circumstances, without any consciously formed purpose, or anticipation of results. PP I, ch 4
==
Habit, by Wm James (Internet Archive)...
==
Principles of Psychology, ch. IV-
HABIT.

When we look at living creatures from an outward point of view, one of the first things that strike us is that they are bundles of habits. In wild animals, the usual round of daily behavior seems a necessity implanted at birth; in animals domesticated, and especially in man, it seems, to a great extent, to be the result of education. The habits to which there is an innate tendency are called instincts; some of those due to education would by most persons be called acts of reason. It thus appears that habit covers a very large part of life, and that one engaged in studying the objective manifestations of mind is bound at the very outset to define clearly just what its limits are.

The moment one tries to define what habit is, one is led to the fundamental properties of matter. The laws of Nature are nothing but the immutable habits which the different elementary sorts of matter follow in their actions and reactions upon each other. In the organic world, however, the habits are more variable than this. Even instincts vary from one individual to another of a kind; and are modified in the same individual, as we shall later see, to suit the exigencies of the case. The habits of an elementary particle of matter cannot change (on the principles of the atomistic philosophy), because the particle is itself an unchangeable thing; but those of a compound mass of matter can change, because they are in the last instance due to the structure of the compound, and either outward forces or inward tensions can, from one hour to another, turn that structure into something different from what it was. That is, they can do so if the body be plastic enough to maintain[Pg 105] its integrity, and be not disrupted when its structure yields... (continues)

....Habit is thus the enormous fly-wheel of society, its most precious conservative agent. It alone is what keeps us all within the bounds of ordinance, and saves the children of fortune from the envious uprisings of the poor. It alone prevents the hardest and most repulsive walks of life from being deserted by those brought up to tread therein. It keeps the fisherman and the deck-hand at sea through the winter; it holds the miner in his darkness, and nails the countryman to his log-cabin and his lonely farm through all the months of snow; it protects us from invasion by the natives of the desert and the frozen zone. It dooms us all to fight out the battle of life upon the lines of our nurture or our early choice, and to make the best of a pursuit that disagrees, because there is no other for which we are fitted, and it is too late to begin again. It keeps different social strata from mixing. Already at the age of twenty-five you see the professional mannerism settling down on the young commercial traveller, on the young doctor, on the young minister, on the young counsellor-at-law. You see the little lines of cleavage running through the character, the tricks of thought, the prejudices, the ways of the 'shop,' in a word, from which the man can by-and-by no more escape than his coat-sleeve can suddenly fall into a new set of folds. On the whole, it is best he should not escape. It is well for the world that in most of us, by the age of thirty, the character has set like plaster, and will never soften again.

If the period between twenty and thirty is the critical one in the formation of intellectual and professional habits,[Pg 122] the period below twenty is more important still for the fixing of personal habits, properly so called, such as vocalization and pronunciation, gesture, motion, and address. Hardly ever is a language learned after twenty spoken without a foreign accent; hardly ever can a youth transferred to the society of his betters unlearn the nasality and other vices of speech bred in him by the associations of his growing years. Hardly ever, indeed, no matter how much money there be in his pocket, can he even learn to dress like a gentleman-born. The merchants offer their wares as eagerly to him as to the veriest 'swell,' but he simply cannot buy the right things. An invisible law, as strong as gravitation, keeps him within his orbit, arrayed this year as he was the last; and how his better-bred acquaintances contrive to get the things they wear will be for him a mystery till his dying day.

The great thing, then, in all education, is to make our nervous system our ally instead of our enemy. It is to fund and capitalize our acquisitions, and live at ease upon the interest of the fund. For this we must make automatic and habitual, as early as possible, as many useful actions as we can, and guard against the growing into ways that are likely to be disadvantageous to us, as we should guard against the plague. The more of the details of our daily life we can hand over to the effortless custody of automatism, the more our higher powers of mind will be set free for their own proper work. There is no more miserable human being than one in whom nothing is habitual but indecision, and for whom the lighting of every cigar, the drinking of every cup, the time of rising and going to bed every day, and the beginning of every bit of work, are subjects of express volitional deliberation. Full half the time of such a man goes to the deciding, or regretting, of matters which ought to be so ingrained in him as practically not to exist for his consciousness at all. If there be such daily duties not yet ingrained in any one of my readers, let him begin this very hour to set the matter right.

In Professor Bain's chapter on 'The Moral Habits' there are some admirable practical remarks laid down. Two great maxims emerge from his treatment. The first[Pg 123] is that in the acquisition of a new habit, or the leaving off of an old one, we must take care to launch ourselves with as strong and decided an initiative as possible. Accumulate all the possible circumstances which shall re-enforce the right motives; put yourself assiduously in conditions that encourage the new way; make engagements incompatible with the old; take a public pledge, if the case allows; in short, envelop your resolution with every aid you know. This will give your new beginning such a momentum that the temptation to break down will not occur as soon as it otherwise might; and every day during which a breakdown is postponed adds to the chances of its not occurring at all.

The second maxim is: Never suffer an exception to occur till the new habit is securely rooted in your life. Each lapse is like the letting fall of a ball of string which one is carefully winding up; a single slip undoes more than a great many turns will wind again. Continuity of training is the great means of making the nervous system act infallibly right. As Professor Bain says:


"The peculiarity of the moral habits, contradistinguishing them from the intellectual acquisitions, is the presence of two hostile powers, one to be gradually raised into the ascendant over the other. It is necessary, above all things, in such a situation, never to lose a battle. Every gain on the wrong side undoes the effect of many conquests on the right. The essential precaution, therefore, is so to regulate the two opposing powers that the one may have a series of uninterrupted successes, until repetition has fortified it to such a degree as to enable it to cope with the opposition, under any circumstances. This is the theoretically best career of mental progress."

The need of securing success at the outset is imperative. Failure at first is apt to dampen the energy of all future attempts, whereas past experience of success nerves one to future vigor. Goethe says to a man who consulted him about an enterprise but mistrusted his own powers: "Ach! you need only blow on your hands!" And the remark illustrates the effect on Goethe's spirits of his own habitually successful career. Prof. Baumann, from whom I borrow the anecdote,[152] says that the collapse of barbarian[Pg 124] nations when Europeans come among them is due to their despair of ever succeeding as the new-comers do in the larger tasks of life. Old ways are broken and new ones not formed.

The question of 'tapering-off,' in abandoning such habits as drink and opium-indulgence, comes in here, and is a question about which experts differ within certain limits, and in regard to what may be best for an individual case. In the main, however, all expert opinion would agree that abrupt acquisition of the new habit is the best way, if there be a real possibility of carrying it out. We must be careful not to give the will so stiff a task as to insure its defeat at the very outset; but, provided one can stand it, a sharp period of suffering, and then a free time, is the best thing to aim at, whether in giving up a habit like that of opium, or in simply changing one's hours of rising or of work. It is surprising how soon a desire will die of inanition if it be never fed.


"One must first learn, unmoved, looking neither to the right nor left, to walk firmly on the straight and narrow path, before one can begin 'to make one's self over again.' He who every day makes a fresh resolve is like one who, arriving at the edge of the ditch he is to leap, forever stops and returns for a fresh run. Without unbroken advance there is no such thing as accumulation of the ethical forces possible, and to make this possible, and to exercise us and habituate us in it, is the sovereign blessing of regular work."[153]

A third maxim may be added to the preceding pair: Seize the very first possible opportunity to act on every resolution you make, and on every emotional prompting you may experience in the direction of the habits you aspire to gain. It is not in the moment of their forming, but in the moment of their producing motor effects, that resolves and aspirations communicate the new 'set' to the brain. As the author last quoted remarks:


"The actual presence of the practical opportunity alone furnishes the fulcrum upon which the lever can rest, by means of which the moral will may multiply its strength, and raise itself aloft. He who has no solid ground to press against will never get beyond the stage of empty gesture-making."

[Pg 125]

No matter how full a reservoir of maxims one may possess, and no matter how good one's sentiments may be, if one have not taken advantage of every concrete opportunity to act, one's character may remain entirely unaffected for the better. With mere good intentions, hell is proverbially paved. And this is an obvious consequence of the principles we have laid down. A 'character,' as J. S. Mill says, 'is a completely fashioned will'; and a will, in the sense in which he means it, is an aggregate of tendencies to act in a firm and prompt and definite way upon all the principal emergencies of life. A tendency to act only becomes effectively ingrained in us in proportion to the uninterrupted frequency with which the actions actually occur, and the brain 'grows' to their use. Every time a resolve or a fine glow of feeling evaporates without bearing practical fruit is worse than a chance lost; it works so as positively to hinder future resolutions and emotions from taking the normal path of discharge. There is no more contemptible type of human character than that of the nerveless sentimentalist and dreamer, who spends his life in a weltering sea of sensibility and emotion, but who never does a manly concrete deed. Rousseau, inflaming all the mothers of France, by his eloquence, to follow Nature and nurse their babies themselves, while he sends his own children to the foundling hospital, is the classical example of what I mean. But every one of us in his measure, whenever, after glowing for an abstractly formulated Good, he practically ignores some actual case, among the squalid 'other particulars' of which that same Good lurks disguised, treads straight on Rousseau's path. All Goods are disguised by the vulgarity of their concomitants, in this work-a-day world; but woe to him who can only recognize them when he thinks them in their pure and abstract form! The habit of excessive novel-reading and theatre-going will produce true monsters in this line. The weeping of a Russian lady over the fictitious personages in the play, while her coachman is freezing to death on his seat outside, is the sort of thing that everywhere happens on a less glaring scale. Even the habit of excessive indulgence in music, for those who are neither performers themselves nor musically gifted[Pg 126] enough to take it in a purely intellectual way, has probably a relaxing effect upon the character. One becomes filled with emotions which habitually pass without prompting to any deed, and so the inertly sentimental condition is kept up. The remedy would be, never to suffer one's self to have an emotion at a concert, without expressing it afterward in some active way.[154] Let the expression be the least thing in the world—speaking genially to one's aunt, or giving up one's seat in a horse-car, if nothing more heroic offers—but let it not fail to take place.

These latter cases make us aware that it is not simply particular lines of discharge, but also general forms of discharge, that seem to be grooved out by habit in the brain. Just as, if we let our emotions evaporate, they get into a way of evaporating; so there is reason to suppose that if we often flinch from making an effort, before we know it the effort-making capacity will be gone; and that, if we suffer the wandering of our attention, presently it will wander all the time. Attention and effort are, as we shall see later, but two names for the same psychic fact. To what brain-processes they correspond we do not know. The strongest reason for believing that they do depend on brain-processes at all, and are not pure acts of the spirit, is just this fact, that they seem in some degree subject to the law of habit, which is a material law. As a final practical maxim, relative to these habits of the will, we may, then, offer something like this: Keep the faculty of effort alive in you by a little gratuitous exercise every day. That is, be systematically ascetic or heroic in little unnecessary points, do every day or two something for no other reason than that you would rather not do it, so that when the hour of dire need draws nigh, it may find you not unnerved and untrained to stand the test. Asceticism of this sort is like the insurance which a man pays on his house and goods. The tax does him no good at the time, and possibly may never bring him a return. But if the fire does come, his having paid it will be his salvation from ruin. So with the man who has[Pg 127] daily inured himself to habits of concentrated attention, energetic volition, and self-denial in unnecessary things. He will stand like a tower when everything rocks around him, and when his softer fellow-mortals are winnowed like chaff in the blast.

The physiological study of mental conditions is thus the most powerful ally of hortatory ethics. The hell to be endured hereafter, of which theology tells, is no worse than the hell we make for ourselves in this world by habitually fashioning our characters in the wrong way. Could the young but realize how soon they will become mere walking bundles of habits, they would give more heed to their conduct while in the plastic state. We are spinning our own fates, good or evil, and never to be undone. Every smallest stroke of virtue or of vice leaves its never so little scar. The drunken Rip Van Winkle, in Jefferson's play, excuses himself for every fresh dereliction by saying, 'I won't count this time!' Well! he may not count it, and a kind Heaven may not count it; but it is being counted none the less. Down among his nerve-cells and fibres the molecules are counting it, registering and storing it up to be used against him when the next temptation comes. Nothing we ever do is, in strict scientific literalness, wiped out. Of course, this has its good side as well as its bad one. As we become permanent drunkards by so many separate drinks, so we become saints in the moral, and authorities and experts in the practical and scientific spheres, by so many separate acts and hours of work. Let no youth have any anxiety about the upshot of his education, whatever the line of it may be. If he keep faithfully busy each hour of the working-day, he may safely leave the final result to itself. He can with perfect certainty count on waking up some fine morning, to find himself one of the competent ones of his generation, in whatever pursuit he may have singled out. Silently, between all the details of his business, the power of judging in all that class of matter will have built itself up within him as a possession that will never pass away. Young people should know this truth in advance. The ignorance of it has probably engendered more discouragement and faint-heartedness in youths embarking on arduous careers than all other causes put together.
==
Maria Popova:
William James on the Psychology of Habit
“We are spinning our own fates, good or evil, and never to be undone.”

“We are what we repeatedly do,” Aristotle famously proclaimed. “Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.” Perhaps most fascinating in Michael Lewis’s altogether fantastic recent Vanity Fair profile of Barack Obama is, indeed, the President’s relationship with habit — particularly his optimization of everyday behaviors to such a degree that they require as little cognitive load as possible, allowing him to better focus on the important decisions, the stuff of excellence.

I found this interesting not merely out of solipsism, as it somehow validated my having had the same breakfast day in and day out for nearly a decade (steel-cut oats, fat-free Greek yogurt, whey protein powder, seasonal fruit), but also because it isn’t a novel idea at all. In fact, the same tenets Obama applies to the architecture of his daily life are those pioneering psychologist and philosopher William James wrote about in 1887, when he penned Habit (public library; public domain) — a short treatise on how our behavioral patterns shape who we are and what we often refer to as character and personality... (continues)
==

THE STREAM OF THOUGHT.

We now begin our study of the mind from within. Most books start with sensations, as the simplest mental facts, and proceed synthetically, constructing each higher stage from those below it. But this is abandoning the empirical method of investigation. No one ever had a simple sensation by itself. Consciousness, from our natal day, is of a teeming multiplicity of objects and relations, and what we call simple sensations are results of discriminative attention, pushed often to a very high degree. It is astonishing what havoc is wrought in psychology by admitting at the outset apparently innocent suppositions, that nevertheless contain a flaw. The bad consequences develop themselves later on, and are irremediable, being woven through the whole texture of the work. The notion that sensations, being the simplest things, are the first things to take up in psychology is one of these suppositions. The only thing which psychology has a right to postulate at the outset is the fact of thinking itself, and that must first be taken up and analyzed. If sensations then prove to be amongst the elements of the thinking, we shall be no worse off as respects them than if we had taken them for granted at the start.

The first fact for us, then, as psychologists, is that thinking of some sort goes on. I use the word thinking, in accordance with what was said on p. 186, for every form of consciousness indiscriminately. If we could say in English 'it thinks,' as we say 'it rains 'or 'it blows,' we should be[Pg 225] stating the fact most simply and with the minimum of assumption. As we cannot, we must simply say that thought goes on...

I can only define 'continuous' as that which is without breach, crack, or division. I have already said that the breach from one mind to another is perhaps the greatest breach in nature. The only breaches that can well be conceived to occur within the limits of a single mind would either be interruptions, time-gaps during which the consciousness went out altogether to come into existence again at a later moment; or they would be breaks in the quality, or content, of the thought, so abrupt that the segment that followed had no connection whatever with the one that went before. The proposition that within each personal consciousness thought feels continuous, means two things:

1. That even where there is a time-gap the consciousness after it feels as if it belonged together with the consciousness before it, as another part of the same self;

2. That the changes from one moment to another in the quality of the consciousness are never absolutely abrupt.

The case of the time-gaps, as the simplest, shall be taken first. And first of all a word about time-gaps of which the consciousness may not be itself aware.

On page 200 we saw that such time-gaps existed, and that they might be more numerous than is usually supposed. If the consciousness is not aware of them, it cannot feel them as interruptions. In the unconsciousness produced by nitrous oxide and other anæsthetics, in that of epilepsy and fainting, the broken edges of the sentient life may[Pg 238] meet and merge over the gap, much as the feelings of space of the opposite margins of the 'blind spot' meet and merge over that objective interruption to the sensitiveness of the eye. Such consciousness as this, whatever it be for the onlooking psychologist, is for itself unbroken. It feels unbroken; a waking day of it is sensibly a unit as long as that day lasts, in the sense in which the hours themselves are units, as having all their parts next each other, with no intrusive alien substance between. To expect the consciousness to feel the interruptions of its objective continuity as gaps, would be like expecting the eye to feel a gap of silence because it does not hear, or the ear to feel a gap of darkness because it does not see. So much for the gaps that are unfelt.

With the felt gaps the case is different. On waking from sleep, we usually know that we have been unconscious, and we often have an accurate judgment of how long. The judgment here is certainly an inference from sensible signs, and its ease is due to long practice in the particular field.[225] The result of it, however, is that the consciousness is, for itself, not what it was in the former case, but interrupted and discontinuous, in the mere sense of the words. But in the other sense of continuity, the sense of the parts being inwardly connected and belonging together because they are parts of a common whole, the consciousness remains sensibly continuous and one. What now is the common whole? The natural name for it is myself, I, or me.

When Paul and Peter wake up in the same bed, and recognize that they have been asleep, each one of them mentally reaches back and makes connection with but one of the two streams of thought which were broken by the sleeping hours. As the current of an electrode buried in the ground unerringly finds its way to its own similarly buried mate, across no matter how much intervening earth; so Peter's present instantly finds out Peter's past, and never by mistake knits itself on to that of Paul. Paul's thought in turn is as little liable to go astray. The past thought of Peter is appropriated by the present Peter alone. He may[Pg 239] have a knowledge, and a correct one too, of what Paul's last drowsy states of mind were as he sank into sleep, but it is an entirely different sort of knowledge from that which he has of his own last states. He remembers his own states, whilst he only conceives Paul's. Remembrance is like direct feeling; its object is suffused with a warmth and intimacy to which no object of mere conception ever attains. This quality of warmth and intimacy and immediacy is what Peter's present thought also possesses for itself. So sure as this present is me, is mine, it says, so sure is anything else that comes with the same warmth and intimacy and immediacy, me and mine. What the qualities called warmth and intimacy may in themselves be will have to be matter for future consideration. But whatever past feelings appear with those qualities must be admitted to receive the greeting of the present mental state, to be owned by it, and accepted as belonging together with it in a common self. This community of self is what the time-gap cannot break in twain, and is why a present thought, although not ignorant of the time-gap, can still regard itself as continuous with certain chosen portions of the past.

Consciousness, then, does not appear to itself chopped up in bits. Such words as 'chain' or 'train' do not describe it fitly as it presents itself in the first instance. It is nothing jointed; it flows. A 'river' or a 'stream' are the metaphors by which it is most naturally described. In talking of it hereafter, let us call it the stream of thought, of consciousness, or of subjective life...

the mind is at every stage a theatre of simultaneous possibilities. Consciousness consists in the comparison of these with each other, the selection of some, and the suppression of the rest by the reinforcing and inhibiting agency of attention. The highest and most elaborated mental products are filtered from the data chosen by the faculty next beneath, out of the mass offered by the faculty below that, which mass in turn was sifted from a still larger amount of yet simpler material, and so on. The mind, in short, works on the data it receives very much as a sculptor works on his block of stone. In a sense the statue stood there from eternity. But there were a thousand different ones beside it, and the sculptor alone is to thank for having extricated this one from the rest. Just so the world of each of us, howsoever different our several views of it may be, all lay embedded in the primordial chaos of sensations, which gave the mere matter to the thought of all of us indifferently. We may, if we like, by our reasonings unwind things back to that[Pg 289] black and jointless continuity of space and moving clouds of swarming atoms which science calls the only real world. But all the while the world we feel and live in will be that which our ancestors and we, by slowly cumulative strokes of choice, have extricated out of this, like sculptors, by simply rejecting certain portions of the given stuff. Other sculptors, other statues from the same stone! Other minds, other worlds from the same monotonous and inexpressive chaos! My world is but one in a million alike embedded, alike real to those who may abstract them. How different must be the worlds in the consciousness of ant, cuttle-fish, or crab!

But in my mind and your mind the rejected portions and the selected portions of the original world-stuff are to a great extent the same. The human race as a whole largely agrees as to what it shall notice and name, and what not. And among the noticed parts we select in much the same way for accentuation and preference or subordination and dislike. There is, however, one entirely extraordinary case in which no two men ever are known to choose alike. One great splitting of the whole universe into two halves is made by each of us; and for each of us almost all of the interest attaches to one of the halves; but we all draw the line of division between them in a different place. When I say that we all call the two halves by the same; names, and that those names are 'me' and 'not-me' respectively, it will at once be seen what I mean. The altogether unique kind of interest which each human mind feels in those parts of creation which it can call me or mine may be a moral riddle, but it is a fundamental psychological fact. No mind can take the same interest in his neighbor's me as in his own. The neighbor's me falls together with all the rest of things in one foreign mass, against which his own me stands out in startling relief. Even the trodden worm, as Lotze somewhere says, contrasts his own suffering self with the whole remaining universe, though he have no clear conception either of himself or of what the universe may be. He is for me a mere part of the world;[Pg 290] for him it is I who am the mere part. Each of us dichotomizes the Kosmos in a different place (continues)
==
Habit

LISTEN (11.11.21). Today in Happiness our focus is Habit, a chapter in James's Principles of Psychology and an anchor of the happy life.

James wrote Principles better to understand the origin of consciousness, but habit's great gift is its harnessing of the power of unconscious autonomous activity, thus freeing the conscious mind for other pursuits. Turn over as much of life's necessary and repetitive little tasks to unconscious habit as you can, James advises, and watch your mind and spirit soar.

John Kaag says James wanted to be somebody, to make his mark in the world, and that "makes being happy rather difficult." But James was always going to find happiness a challenge, ambitions or no. He knew intuitively that we are, as Aristotle said, the product of our habitual acts... (continues)
==
Consciousness and transcendence

LISTEN (11.16.21.) Today in Happiness we consider John Kaag's fourth chapter in Sick Souls, Healthy Minds. "Consciousness and Transcendence" are big topics which I've considered before. I think Peter Ackroyd was onto something when he proposed to define transcendence in hyphenated fashion": trans-end-dance: the ability to move beyond the end, otherwise called the dance of death. The Plato Papers

This particular dance of transcendence should not be confused with Johnnny Depp's in that film...

Consciousness is complicated... (continues)

20 comments:

  1. H03
    Which comes first, happiness or laughter
    For me, the laughter catches you first then the happiness kind of follows right after. The laughter is more of an abrupt thing, then you have to realize what the other feeling is.

    What does being "woke" mean to you?
    Being aware of what's happening around you.

    Are there any small habits you'd like to gain or lose?
    To lose: Changing my hair too much, biting my thumb nail, and feeling the compulsive need to do any claw machine I see.
    To gain, and I'm working on all of these: Going to the gym in the morning, eating regularly, controlling my emotions, making my bed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that being woke is knowing what is happening around you, but I would have to add that it also what is happening in other parts of the world and in other social circles.

      Delete
    2. H01
      Depending on the level of control you have on your emotions that can be a negative. Free spirits and emotions are amazing.

      Delete
  2. H03

    What does "transcendence" mean to you?

    I guess for me transcendence would mean something that is abnormal in terms of things that aren’t human related.

    Do you think you could remain hopeful and happy after losing a child?

    I don’t think I could be hopeful and happy after losing a child.

    What does being "woke" mean to you?

    Being woke means to me being able to educate myself on certain aspects of life, like racism and looking beyond my own opinions in hopes of being understanding of other social issues people may face.


    ReplyDelete
  3. H2
    Do you think you could remain hopeful and happy after losing a child?

    No. I've heard a saying that a child who loses their parent is an "orphan," but there is no word for a parent who has lost their child. It's too terrible to imagine. If I lost the dearest thing to me, I don't see how I could be hopeful or happy. Maybe I would eventually find a way, but I can imagine myself distraught for awhile.

    What does being "woke" mean to you?

    Being on some kind of different level or understanding than the "average person." Or really just saying something that may be "deep" or "philosophical." If I ever say it, however, it's meant as a joke. There are better ways to define people that have really profound ideas.

    Are there any small habits you'd like to gain or lose? What's stopping you?
    Yes, I'm a very habitual person. But for this reason, I think this is why it stops me. I tend to be very stubborn to break my routine, because I like to be on a pretty set schedule for myself and what I do. Even if times where I've acted on impulse I wound up having a good time.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wish I had the habit of having a schedule. I am the opposite of you. It is hard for me to commit to one. I like just going with the flow and doing whatever feels right which a lot of the time is very counterproductive.

      Delete
    2. I also would like to have a set schedule/ routine, but I agree that would be dull. I enjoy acting on impulse like when I cut my hair, but too much impulse would lead to an unhealthy lifestyle. Having a schedule would mean having good habits.

      Delete
  4. H03
    Do you want to "be somebody"? What does that mean? Does it make happiness harder to achieve?

    Does adult life make it harder to identify your "real" self?

    I do not think it is harder to identify as your real self as an adult. Young people always have someone who is trying to tell them who they are supposed to be. Whether it is parents, friends, or society, everyone has an opinion on who you should be and as a young person, there is more pressure to succumb to those expectations. Adults have more freedom to identify as their “real self” because there are fewer people who get to tell you what to do. Due to that, I think it might be easier to achieve happiness because it is really hard on a person to not be able to be their true self. I think that is one of the leading causes of teen suicide is not being able to be who you are and having others hate you for who you are.

    ReplyDelete
  5. (H03)

    What does being "woke" mean to you?

    I think that the word "woke" has been deluded in today's society from any truly positive meaning that it could have had. While often interpreted to mean something along the lines of aware of boundaries and moral correctness in today's world, wokeness has been distorted into a contest to gain the moral high ground and aim attacks at others. Wokeness ideally would mean to be "awakened" to a greater purpose or a new understanding of the world, however in practice it has become politicized and turned into a rather annoying word to hear in any official context.


    Does the thought that "this too shall pass" console or comfort you?

    The literal interpretation of "this too shall pass" encompasses my current life, and as such has some bittersweet comfort, as someone who struggles with too much apathy. Being able to "go with the flow" and understand that struggles, pain, as well as good things are all temporary can be helpful to live a stable life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You have a beautiful view of "this too shall pass".

      Delete
  6. H1
    4. James complained in 1884 that what devoured his time?
    James complained to his tutor that teaching had taken up all of his time.

    5. James thought everybody should do what each day?
    He believed that everyone should do 2 things they hate everyday for practice.
    Which comes first, happiness or laughter 87?
    I feel like it can be both. When I am happy I find it easier to laugh. It comes out easier, and being in a good mindset often puts me in a mood when everything is funny and laughter is inevitable. I also believe laughter brings happiness. Laughing with friends instantly brightens my mood. The silent laughter that occurs during small moments brings an intense happiness. Although it may only last during that time of laughter, it blocks out any other thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I feel like you can laugh without truly being happy. Especially when in uncomfortable situations. I know so many people who laugh when they are nervous, and they definitely aren't over the moon with happiness in that moment of time. However, if not referring to those situations I definitely think happiness would still come first.

      Delete
  7. Does adult life make it harder to identify your "real" self?
    For me it does because I have so many responsibilities and it is hard to focus on what I like and want to do. This makes it hard to know who I am.
    Does the thought that "this too shall pass" console or comfort you?
    This very much does comfort me. It reminds me of a quote from Lord of the Rings. Samwise Gamgee says, "But in the end, it's only a passing thing this shadow, even darkness must pass". This is very comforting because it alludes to sad things being like a storm that passes.
    Do you think you could remain hopeful and happy after losing a child?
    I think it would take a very long time for me to be happy again if this happened to me. I would feel trapped in an endless pit of sadness because I would want so bad for it not to have happened but it would be too late.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Does adult life make it harder to identify your "real" self? 70
    - Yes, when you have adult responsibilities there is no time to practice hobbies and find what you enjoy.
    Are there any small habits you'd like to gain or lose? What's stopping you?
    - I would like to exercise more and be a better member of society, but I am tired and it is easier to just stay at home. I would also like to eat healthier, but making healthy food takes more time and effort than the unhealthier options.
    Does the thought that "this too shall pass" console or comfort you? 104
    - Yes, when I am having a bad day all I have to think about is how I won’t remember most of it tomorrow. I take comfort that any awkward interaction or bad day will not be as fresh in the memory as it is the day it happened.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe that adult life definitely makes it harder to be yourself. There are so many things to worry about than finding out what you truly like to do and be your true self.

      Delete
    2. H01

      I think the opposite because in my mind no matter what you have to do the method on which you do them is apart of who you are. There are a multitude of factors that contribute to you being you.

      Delete
  9. 1. Tragedies that befell him in his 40s led to James's quest for ___. 95
    The transcendent

    2. What experience led James to "the taste of the intolerable mysteriousness" of existence? 97
    The experience of losing Herman (his young son). He would go into the mysteriousness of existence in order to see if it could be anything other than intolerable.

    3. What did James think is sacrificed when we study the mind in objective analytic terms? 99
    It forever misses the subjective sense of consciousness, the perspective of the mind within.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Does the thought that "this too shall pass" console or comfort you? 

    H01

    Yes it does. Sometimes even when you can't see the 'light at the end of the tunnel' the thought that everything comes to an end is comforting.

    ReplyDelete
  11. H2. What does being "woke" mean to you?

    Being “woke” means educating myself on current topics and social issues while also having an open mind to different ideas and beliefs that may not necessarily match mine. Furthermore, it deals with holding myself and others accountable for their actions without the use of verbal attacks or belittlement.

    Which comes first, happiness or laughter?

    Laughter can be manufactured without a sense of happiness. For instance, some people use it as a coping mechanisms for more somber emotions or to relive tension in awkward situations. However, in order to produce a genuine laugh or smile, happiness must come first. When someone is happy, they tend to generate a smile or even a laugh.

    Do you think you could remain hopeful and happy after losing a child?

    I do not believe I could even regain a complete sense of hopefulness or happiness after losing a child. I may be able to come to terms with the death of my child and move forward. However, the idea of possibly losing a child would take a heavy toll on my overall mental health.

    ReplyDelete