We'll begin to discuss this after Thursday's exam, time permitting:
Russell, Ayer, Sartre, de Beauvoir, Camus-LH 31-33, HWT 24-26 (Transience, Impartiality), FL 25-26.
1. Reading whose autobiography led young Bertrand Russell to reject God? OR, What did he see as the logical problem with the First Cause Argument? Do you agree with Russell about this?
2. The idea of a barber who shaves all who don't shave themselves is a logical ______, a seeming contradiction that is both true and false. Another example of the same thing would be a statement like "This sentence is ___." Do these examples show a deep problem with language and its ability to accurately portray reality?3. A.J. Ayer's ______ Principle, stated in his 1936 book Language, Truth and Logic, was part of the movement known as _____ ______. Is unverifiability the same thing as meaninglessness?
4. Humans don't have an _____, said Jean Paul Sartre, and are in "bad faith" like the ____ who thinks of himself as completely defined by his work. Is it possible to avoid bad faith in every situation?
5. What was Sartre's frustrating advice to the student who didn't know whether to join the Resistance? Should he have said something else?
6. When Simone de Beauvoir said women are not born that way, she meant that they tend to accept what? Are any essential identities conferred by birth?
7. Which Greek myth did Albert Camus use to illustrate human absurdity, as he saw it? Do you ever feel that way? Do you worry that someday you might, in work or relationships or something else?
- What do you think of the Japanese sensitivity to nature and the seasons? 293
- What do you think of Shinto's "no clear-cut separation between the aesthetic, the moral, and the religious"? 294
- What do you think it means to think without concepts? 295
- Do you agree with what "the enlightened [Buddhist] declares"? 296
- Is time more a feeling than a concept? 296 What would Kant say?
- What do you think of Hume's "is/ought gap"? 297
- What can tea teach us? 299
- What is wabi-sabi? 300
- Was Kravinsky crazy? 301 How about Peter Singer? 302
- Should we consider the welfare of distant strangers as much as of kith and kin? 303
- Are Mozi and Mill saying the same thing? 304
- Kant's categorical imperative, again: any comment? 309
- Do you like Rawls' veil of ignorance idea? 309
- Do you agree with the key principles of the Enlightenment? 310
- Is Owen Flanagan right about "no sensible person"? 312
- Is the mixing desk a good metaphor for moral pluralism? Do you agree that it's not the same as laissez-faire relativism? 314-15
- Reading Mill's autobiography led young Bertrand Russell to reject God. Do you agree or disagree with his reasoning? Why? 185
I for a long time accepted the argument of the First Cause, until one day at the age of eighteen I read _____'s Autobiography, and I there found this sentence: "My father taught me that the question 'Who made me?' cannot be answered, since it immediately suggests the further question `Who made god?'" That very simple sentence showed me, as I still think, the fallacy in the argument of the First Cause. If everything must have a cause, then God must have a cause. If there can be anything without a cause, it may just as well be the world as God, so that there cannot be any validity in that argument. It is exactly of the same nature as the Hindu's view, that the world rested upon an elephant and the elephant rested upon a tortoise; and when they said, "How about the tortoise?" the Indian said, "Suppose we change the subject." The argument is really no better than that. Why I Am Not a Christian
- Should it bother us that logical paradoxes that seem to be true AND false can be formulated in grammatically correct statements? Does this show something important about the limits of language, thought, and (thus) philosophy? 186
- Were young A.J. Ayer and the Positivists on the right track with their Verification Principle? Or was the older, post-Near Death Experience Ayer wiser about beliefs that cannot be conclusively verified? 190, 194
- Do you agree with Sartre that humans, unlike inanimate objects such as inkwells, don't have an essential nature? Is our common biology, DNA etc. not essential to our species identity? 197
- If you become deeply involved in your work (or seem to, like Sartre's Waiter) are you in "bad faith"? 198
- What do you think of Sartre's advice to the student who didn't know whether to join the Resistance? 199
- Do you agree with Simone de Beauvoir about accepting a gender identity based on men's judgments? 200
- Is life a Sisyphean struggle? Is it "absurd"? Do you agree with Camus that Sisyphus must be happy? Why or why not? 201
- Do you see any parallels between 1962 (as reflected in the SDS Manifesto, for instance) and today? 212
- What's your opinion of "Gun nuts"? And what should we do about the epidemic of gun violence in America? 218
- Do you think of The Force (in Star Wars) as a "spiritual fantasy" or does it name something you consider real? 222
- Was the sudden and widespread availability of contraception (The Pill) in the '60s a positive development, all things considered? 230
- Is the fantasy of perpetual youth an infantilizing force in America? 233 (Compare with our next read, Why Grow Up)
- Are we becoming "fake humans"? 234
Podcasts-Sartre, de Beauvoir, Camus, Russell, Wittgenstein, Ayer, Arendt, Popper, Ordinary Language, Trolley Problems
Simone de Beauvoir. Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss Simone de Beauvoir. "One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman," she wrote in her best known and most influential work, The Second Sex, her exploration of what it means to be a woman in a world defined by men. Published in 1949, it was an immediate success with the thousands of women who bought it. Many male critics felt men came out of it rather badly. Beauvoir was born in 1908 to a high bourgeois family and it was perhaps her good fortune that her father lost his money when she was a girl. With no dowry, she pursued her education in Paris to get work and in a key exam to allow her to teach philosophy, came second only to Jean Paul Sartre. He was retaking. They became lovers and, for the rest of their lives together, intellectual sparring partners. Sartre concentrated on existentialist philosophy; Beauvoir explored that, and existentialist ethics, plus the novel and, increasingly in the decades up to her death in 1986, the situation of women in the world.
Camus. Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the Algerian-French writer and Existentialist philosopher Albert Camus. Shortly after the new year of 1960, a powerful sports car crashed in the French town of Villeblevin in Burgundy, killing two of its occupants. One was the publisher Michel Gallimard; the other was the writer Albert Camus. In Camus’ pocket was an unused train ticket and in the boot of the car his unfinished autobiography The First Man. Camus was 46. Born in Algeria in 1913, Camus became a working class hero and icon of the French Resistance. His friendship with Sartre has been well documented, as has their falling out; and although Camus has been dubbed both an Absurdist and Existentialist philosopher, he denied he was even a philosopher at all, preferring to think of himself as a writer who expressed the realities of human existence. Awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1957, Camus’ legacy is a rich one, as an author of plays, novels and essays, and as a political thinker who desperately sought a peaceful solution to the War for Independence in his native Algeria.
In addition to his academic work, Russell played an active role in many social and political campaigns. He supported women's suffrage, was imprisoned for his pacifism during World War I and was a founder of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament. He wrote a number of books aimed at the general public, including The History of Western Philosophy which became enormously popular, and in 1950 he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature. Russell's many appearances on the BBC also helped to promote the public understanding of ideas.
Ordinary Language Philosophy. Melvyn Bragg and his guests discuss Ordinary Language Philosophy, a school of thought which emerged in Oxford in the years following World War II. With its roots in the work of Ludwig Wittgenstein, Ordinary Language Philosophy is concerned with the meanings of words as used in everyday speech. Its adherents believed that many philosophical problems were created by the misuse of words, and that if such 'ordinary language' were correctly analysed, such problems would disappear. Philosophers associated with the school include some of the most distinguished British thinkers of the twentieth century, such as Gilbert Ryle and JL Austin.
Hannah Arendt. In a programme first broadcast in 2017, Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the political philosophy of Hannah Arendt. She developed many of her ideas in response to the rise of totalitarianism in the C20th, partly informed by her own experience as a Jew in Nazi Germany before her escape to France and then America. She wanted to understand how politics had taken such a disastrous turn and, drawing on ideas of Greek philosophers as well as her peers, what might be done to create a better political life. Often unsettling, she wrote of 'the banality of evil' when covering the trial of Eichmann, one of the organisers of the Holocaust.
Karl Popper. Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss one of the most important philosophers of the 20th century, Karl Popper whose ideas about science and politics robustly challenged the accepted ideas of the day. He strongly resisted the prevailing empiricist consensus that scientists' theories could be proved true. Popper wrote: “The more we learn about the world and the deeper our learning, the more conscious, specific and articulate will be our knowledge of what we do not know, our knowledge of our ignorance”. He believed that even when a scientific principle had been successfully and repeatedly tested, it was not necessarily true. Instead it had simply not proved false, yet! This became known as the theory of falsification.He called for a clear demarcation between good science, in which theories are constantly challenged, and what he called “pseudo sciences” which couldn't be tested. His debunking of such ideologies led some to describe him as the “murderer of Freud and Marx”. He went on to apply his ideas to politics, advocating an Open Society. His ideas influenced a wide range of politicians, from those close to Margaret Thatcher, to thinkers in the Eastern Communist bloc and South America. So how did Karl Popper change our approach to the philosophy of science? How have scientists and philosophers made use of his ideas? And how are his theories viewed today? Are we any closer to proving scientific principles are “true”?
The Scientific Method. Melvyn Bragg and his guests discuss the evolution of the Scientific Method, the systematic and analytical approach to scientific thought. In 1620 the great philosopher and scientist Francis Bacon published the Novum Organum, a work outlining a new system of thought which he believed should inform all enquiry into the laws of nature. Philosophers before him had given their attention to the reasoning that underlies scientific enquiry; but Bacon's emphasis on observation and experience is often seen today as giving rise to a new phenomenon: the scientific method.The scientific method, and the logical processes on which it is based, became a topic of intense debate in the seventeenth century, and thinkers including Isaac Newton, Thomas Huxley and Karl Popper all made important contributions. Some of the greatest discoveries of the modern age were informed by their work, although even today the term 'scientific method' remains difficult to define.
The Meaning of Life According to AJ Ayer. What was an English philosopher doing at a New York party, saving the young model Naomi Campbell from a rather pushy boxing heavyweight champion, Mike Tyson? The philosopher was Alfred Jules Ayer, who was just as at home mixing with the glitterati as he was with Oxford dons. On the one hand he was an academic, on the other a celebrity and bon viveur.
So what does this logician have to say about the meaning of life?
In 1988, a year before his death, he gave a lecture at the Conway Hall in which he set out his notion of existence. By this time, ‘Freddie’ Ayer was one of the UK’s most prominent public intellectuals, with regular television and radio appearances, discussing the moral issues of the day.
Ayer’s former student at Oxford, philosopher AC Grayling, remembers the tutor that became his friend. He explores the man of contradictions – the atheist who almost recanted after a near-death incident; the deep thinker with a weakness for mistresses and Tottenham Hotspur. What was his contribution to philosophy? How did it inform the way he lived his life? What, if anything, can we learn from Freddie’s view on the big question?
The Philosopher's ArmsSeries 4 Episode 2 of 4
Pints and Philosophical Problems with Matthew Sweet. This week, trolleyology: how should you decide between two morally troubling courses of action? This is a question which affects both soldiers in the heat of action and decision-makers in the NHS. Matthew is joined in the snug by philosopher David Edmonds.
1. Reading whose autobiography led young Bertrand Russell to reject God? OR, What did he see as the logical problem with the First Cause Argument? Do you agree with Russell about this?
ReplyDeleteJohn Stuart Mill's Autobiography.The First Cause Argument by Thomas Aquinas, Mill wondered what caused God. Russell thought, if one thing didn't have a cause then it couldn't be true that everything did... I agree with Russell.
2. The idea of a barber who shaves all who don't shave themselves is a logical ______, a seeming contradiction that is both true and false. Another example of the same thing would be a statement like "This sentence is ___." Do these examples show a deep problem with language and its ability to accurately portray reality?
A logical paradox. "This sentence is false." I think language is very vast, but it does limit expressing complex ideas accurately.
3. A.J. Ayer's ______ Principle, stated in his 1936 book Language, Truth and Logic, was part of the movement known as _____ ______. Is unverifiability the same thing as meaninglessness?
"Verification Principle." The logical positivism movement. I do not think they are the same. Freud's theory of unconsciousness would be unverifiable and therefore meaningless in Ayer's eyes... But that theory has a lot of meaning.
4. Humans don't have an _____, said Jean Paul Sartre, and are in "bad faith" like the ____ who thinks of himself as completely defined by his work. Is it possible to avoid bad faith in every situation?
Humans don't have an essence, the waiter defines himself by his job, so he is in bad faith. I believe it is possible to avoid, you just need a change of perspective.
5. What was Sartre's frustrating advice to the student who didn't know whether to join the Resistance? Should he have said something else?
The student can choose for himself. I think this is good advice, in a situation like this it is hard to be wrong or right. You should do what makes you happy or you think is best.
6. When Simone de Beauvoir said women are not born that way, she meant that they tend to accept what? Are any essential identities conferred by birth?
They accept men's view of women. I do not think so. We tend to form expecations based on sex and gender. It is very common to throw a "gender reveal party" (amount of flames and destruction optional) because we have accepted that the most tremendous accomplishment you can make at the beginning of your life is the sex you're assigned. Who knew?
7. Which Greek myth did Albert Camus use to illustrate human absurdity, as he saw it? Do you ever feel that way? Do you worry that someday you might, in work or relationships or something else?
The myth of Sisyphus. I felt this way in abusive relationship I had, to an extent.
- Kelly Molloy, Section #13
#11
ReplyDelete1. John Stuart Mill. The logical problem in the first cause is that everything had a cause and god wasn't created without a cause. I agree to a degree.
2. Logical Paradox. This sentence is False. Yes.
3. Verification Principle. logical positivism movement. No I believe some stuff cannot be verified but deemed meaningful.
4. Humans don't have an essence. Waiter. No because you cant avoid everything in life.
5. He was free to choose for himself. I felt he should have been a little bit more humane about the situation considering the state of the world at the time.
6. Men's view on women. Identities are conferred by birth by our society.
7. The Sisyphus myth. I feel this way sometimes. Yes i do.
Section #10
ReplyDeleteRacheal Clark
1. Reading whose autobiography led young Bertrand Russell to reject God? OR, What did he see as the logical problem with the First Cause Argument? Do you agree with Russell about this?
John Stewart Mill led young Bertrand Russell to the lack of belief in god. I completely agree and understand his point of view. It's almost like his movement required questions that simply could not be answered by the believers. Almost like scientific questions and that lack of answes.
2. The idea of a barber who shaves all who don't shave themselves is a logical ______, a seeming contradiction that is both true and false. Another example of the same thing would be a statement like "This sentence is ___." Do these examples show a deep problem with language and its ability to accurately portray reality?
The Logical Paradox, which this sentence is at a false. I would rather think everything needs some sort of logical tools and building blocks of trust; however, it may be adventurous not to be as extremely wise. Otherwise, I do agree.
3. A.J. Ayer's ______ Principle, stated in his 1936 book Language, Truth and Logic, was part of the movement known as _____ ______. Is unverifiability the same thing as meaninglessness?
Verification Principle, logical principle. Now, it certainly does not mean the impractical is meaningless. You can most undoubtedly find meaning behind something that lacks sense! People do it all the time.
4. Humans don't have an _____, said Jean Paul Sartre, and are in "bad faith" like the ____ who thinks of himself as completely defined by his work. Is it possible to avoid bad faith in every situation?
Essence, Waiter. No, in a perfect world maybe.
5. What was Sartre's frustrating advice to the student who didn't know whether to join the Resistance? Should he have said something else?
A student is fully allowed to choose for themselves. No, he indeed said what could've been done. It's up to the willpower of the student to face the challenge of choosing.
6. When Simone de Beauvoir said women are not born that way, she meant that they tend to accept what? Are any essential identities conferred by birth?
To accept Men's view or Women. Frankly, even before birth, people should never decide, bet, or even celebrate what gender you will be, but the celebration of the life itself. Let the child decide whom they want to be and don't resist them from their potential, no matter outdated roles.
7. Which Greek myth did Albert Camus use to illustrate human absurdity, as he saw it? Do you ever feel that way? Do you worry that someday you might, in work or relationships or something else?
Sisyphus is what he illustrated. I do feel this way. It may seem pessimistic, but it's increasing to me all the time. But you must expend yourself psychologically and formally discover what is meaningful to you. Whether it be your kind coworker, or those trees outsides.
1. Reading J.S Mill autobiography led young Russell to reject God. The logical problem of the First cause was if everything has a cause then what caused God. I do agree with Russell.
ReplyDelete2. Paradox; False. Yes, these examples do show a problem with language.
3. Verification, logical positivism. I do not think that just because something is not verifiable does not equate meaninglessness.
4. Essence; waiter. No, it is not.
5. He told the student that he was free and that he should choose for himself. No, I believe any advice would still have the same outcome.
6. That women tend to accept men’s view of what a woman is. I do not think so, you can be whoever you want.
7. He used the Greek myth of Sisyphus. Sometimes I feel this way, but then I think about all the little things that brings me joy and meaning.
1. Bertrand read John Stuart Mill’s autobiography. If there is one thing that doesn’t have a cause then it can’t be true that ‘Everything has a cause’. It made more sense to Russell to think that even God had a cause rather than believe that something could just exist without being caused by anything else. I agree that it is problematic for religion to simply say God made everything and leave it at that with no further explanation.
ReplyDelete2. Paradox, False. No, it is not the language’s fault it is simply how it is used. For example a 14mm wrench is used (primarily) to tighten or loosen a 14mm bolt, so if someone tries to use it to unscrew a 18mm bolt then it is not the tools fault for not being the appropriate wrench it is the user’s fault for getting the wrong size.
3. Verification principle, Logical Positivism.
4. Essence, Waiter. No, because what he seems to mean by bad faith is our cultural norms. And to act in an acceptable way we have to do the dance of normal.
5. He told the student that he was free and that he should choose for himself.
6. “A man’s view of what a woman is.” Gender is given at birth, that will be what your chromosomes will always be period.
7. Human life is like Sisyphus’ task in that it is completely meaningless. There is no point to it: no answers that will explain everything. It’s absurd. Sometimes I have felt this way, but that is the fun part individually we get to choose what the meaning is.
Section 13
Q1. Reading whose autobiography led young Bertrand Russell to reject God? OR, What did he see as the logical problem with the First Cause Argument? Do you agree with Russell about this?
ReplyDeleteA1. John Stuart Mill.
Q2. The idea of a barber who shaves all who don't shave themselves is a logical **Paradox**, a seeming contradiction that is both true and false. Another example of the same thing would be a statement like "This sentence is **false**." Do these examples show a deep problem with language and its ability to accurately portray reality?
A2. Yes, and no.
Q3. A.J. Ayer's **Verification** Principle, stated in his 1936 book Language, Truth and Logic, was part of the movement known as **Logical Positivism**. Is unverifiability the same thing as meaninglessness?
A3. No.
Q4. Humans don't have an **essence**, said Jean Paul Sartre, and are in "bad faith" like the **waiter** who thinks of himself as completely defined by his work. Is it possible to avoid bad faith in every situation?
A4. Yes.
Q5. What was Sartre's frustrating advice to the student who didn't know whether to join the Resistance? Should he have said something else?
A5. That it was completely up to the student. No.
Q6. When Simone de Beauvoir said women are not born that way, she meant that they tend to accept what? Are any essential identities conferred by birth?
A6. Men's views of women. Yes.
Q7. Which Greek myth did Albert Camus use to illustrate human absurdity, as he saw it? Do you ever feel that way? Do you worry that someday you might, in work or relationships or something else?
A7. Sisyphus. Sometimes. No.
#10
ReplyDelete1. Reading whose autobiography led young Bertrand Russell to reject God? OR, What did he see as the logical problem with the First Cause Argument? Do you agree with Russell about this?
John Stewart Mill led Russell to reject god. I agree.
2. The idea of a barber who shaves all who don't shave themselves is a logical ______, a seeming contradiction that is both true and false. Another example of the same thing would be a statement like "This sentence is ___." Do these examples show a deep problem with language and its ability to accurately portray reality?
The idea of a barber who shaves all who don't shave themselves is a logical paradox, a seeming contradiction that is both true and false. Another example of the same thing would be a statement like "This sentence is false”. Yes, it shows an issue with language.
3. A.J. Ayer's ______ Principle, stated in his 1936 book Language, Truth and Logic, was part of the movement known as _____ ______. Is unverifiability the same thing as meaninglessness?
A.J. Ayer's verification Principle, stated in his 1936 book Language, Truth and Logic, was part of the movement known as logical positivism. I would have to disagree, as something being unverifiable does not mean it is without meaning.
4. Humans don't have an _____, said Jean Paul Sartre, and are in "bad faith" like the ____ who thinks of himself as completely defined by his work. Is it possible to avoid bad faith in every situation?
Humans don't have an essence, said Jean Paul Sartre, and are in "bad faith" like the waiter who thinks of himself as completely defined by his work. No.
5. What was Sartre's frustrating advice to the student who didn't know whether to join the Resistance? Should he have said something else?
He told him he was free and to lead himself. Any advice would’ve resulted the same so I believe not.
6. When Simone de Beauvoir said women are not born that way, she meant that they tend to accept what? Are any essential identities conferred by birth?
They tend to accept men’s view of women. I think you are born as male or female and will stay that way forever.
7. Which Greek myth did Albert Camus use to illustrate human absurdity, as he saw it? Do you ever feel that way? Do you worry that someday you might, in work or relationships or something else?
The myth of Sisyphus. Sometimes, but I don’t worry about it.
1. Reading whose autobiography led young Bertrand Russell to reject God? OR, What did he see as the logical problem with the First Cause Argument? Do you agree with Russell about this?
ReplyDeleteJohn Stewart Mill led Russell to reject God he also saw a problem with the first cause argument because if everything had a cause what caused god to be god. I do agree in a way.
2. The idea of a barber who shaves all who don't shave themselves is a logical ______, a seeming contradiction that is both true and false. Another example of the same thing would be a statement like "This sentence is ___." Do these examples show a deep problem with language and its ability to accurately portray reality?
It's a logical paradox, another example would be saying that this sentence is false. The sentences do, it shows the clumsiness of words.
3. A.J. Ayer's ______ Principle, stated in his 1936 book Language, Truth and Logic, was part of the movement known as _____ ______. Is unverifiability the same thing as meaninglessness?
A.j Ayers verification principle, stated in his 1936 book language, Truth and logic was part of the movement known as logical positivism. It is not the same.
4. Humans don't have an _____, said Jean Paul Sartre, and are in "bad faith" like the ____ who thinks of himself as completely defined by his work. Is it possible to avoid bad faith in every situation?
Humans don't have an essence, said Jean Paul Sartre and are in bad faith like the waiter who thinks of himself as a completely defined by his work. Yes you can.
5. What was Sartre's frustrating advice to the student who didn't know whether to join the Resistance? Should he have said something else?
That the student was free and should decide himself what he wanted, I think he said something pretty good, I wouldn't change it.
6. When Simone de Beauvoir said women are not born that way, she meant that they tend to accept what? Are any essential identities conferred by birth?
They tend to accept the view put on them by men, since by her when we are born we are blank slates with no definite choice, but when women grow they tend to be more feminine because the view and prejudice of man. I think that people are born as male or female but they don't have to be always defined by that role and that they can break out of it.
7. Which Greek myth did Albert Camus use to illustrate human absurdity, as he saw it? Do you ever feel that way? Do you worry that someday you might, in work or relationships or something else?
The greek myth of Sisyphus, sometimes I feel this way, that I am stuck pushing that rock like schooling in a way since I completed my K-12 and decided to continue my eduction I am still pushing that rock until I am done. The maybe I might feel useless after or maybe I will feel completed after pushing that rock to a straight road (my career path).